Philemon 1:17: Early Christian view?
How does Philemon 1:17 reflect the early Christian view on slavery and social hierarchy?

Text and Translation (Philemon 1:17)

“So if you consider me a partner, receive him as you would receive me.”

Paul’s imperative places Onesimus, a fugitive household slave, on complete parity with the apostle himself. The term “partner” (Greek koinōnos) denotes full fellowship in Christ; “receive” (prosdechomai) is the same verb Luke uses for welcoming Christ‐bearers (cf. Luke 15:2).


Historical­-Contextual Background

Roman slavery was omnipresent: roughly one‐third of the urban population was enslaved. Legally, a slave was property with no civic standing. Runaways like Onesimus faced branding, chains, or death. Into that matrix steps Paul, writing c. A.D. 60 from his first Roman imprisonment, to Philemon in Colossae—probably a wealthy landowner and leader of a house‐church (Philemon 1:2). The apostle does not ignite political revolt; he plants theological dynamite that undermines the very rationale of master-slave hierarchy.


Linguistic Analysis of Key Terms

• koinōnos (“partner,” v. 17) appears in contemporary papyri for equal business associates. Paul imports it into the church’s relational grammar.

• hōs eme (“as me”) removes gradation: the runaway must be welcomed with the dignity accorded an apostle.

• proslēpsē (v. 12, “receive”) echoes Romans 15:7, “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you.” Christological welcome becomes the paradigm for social relations.


Philemon 1:17 within the Argument of the Epistle

Verses 10–16 ground the request in regeneration: Onesimus is Paul’s “child” (v. 10) and now “more than a slave, a beloved brother” (v. 16). Verse 18 offers to pay any legal debt, echoing Christ’s substitutionary atonement. Thus v. 17 forms the theological hinge: new identity in Christ displaces old status in law.


Theological Motifs: Brotherhood in Christ

The epistle embodies Galatians 3:28: “There is neither slave nor free… for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Spiritual adoption collapses caste systems (cf. Colossians 3:11). Paul leverages friendship (v. 17), substitution (v. 18), and eschatological fellowship (v. 15) to incarnate the gospel’s social entailments.


Social Hierarchy Reconfigured

Early Christians gathered in mixed assemblies (1 Corinthians 11:20-22). A slave might preside at the Lord’s Table while his master partook next to him. By ordering Philemon to treat Onesimus “as me,” Paul tacitly inverts Greco-Roman honor codes. The gospel’s ethic is transformational, not merely transactional: masters must rebrand slaves as family, anticipating the eschaton where only Christ is Lord (Revelation 19:16).


Comparative New Testament Teaching on Slavery

Ephesians 6:9—“He who is both their Master and yours is in heaven.”

1 Corinthians 7:21-23—If freedom can be gained, “avail yourself of the opportunity,” because slaves are “Christ’s freedmen.”

1 Timothy 1:10—Slave-traders categorized with murderers.

Colossians 4:1—“Masters, grant your slaves what is just and fair.”

These passages neither endorse chattel slavery nor foment violent uprising; they uproot it by declaring ontological equality and moral accountability before God.


Consistency with Old Testament Principles

Mosaic legislation required manumission after six years (Exodus 21:2), forbade kidnapping for slavery (Exodus 21:16), and instituted Jubilee liberation (Leviticus 25:10). Israel’s servitude codes were redemptive and covenantal, foreshadowing Christ’s ultimate liberation (Isaiah 61:1; Luke 4:18). Paul, a former rabbi, applies this redemptive trajectory to Onesimus.


Early Church Reception and Practice

• The Shepherd of Hermas (c. A.D. 90-140) urges masters to treat servants as brothers.

• Basil of Caesarea (4th cent.) purchased freedom for impoverished captives.

• Gregory of Nyssa, in his Homily on Ecclesiastes 4, calls slaveholding an offense against God’s image.

Archaeological evidence from catacomb inscriptions shows freedmen buried alongside freeborn believers, indicating social leveling within Christian burial customs.


Implications for Later Christian Abolition Movements

Paul’s seed-thought blossomed in:

• St. Patrick’s 5th-cent. letter condemning slave raids.

• Theodore of Tarsus (7th cent.) who excommunicated enslavers.

• William Wilberforce (18th-19th cent.) who cited Philemon as paradigmatic of Christian abolitionism during Parliamentary debates (Hansard, 12 May 1807). The Clapham Sect’s pamphlets argued that the gospel’s logic, visible in Philemon, necessitated emancipation.


Pastoral and Ethical Application

Modern hierarchies—economic, ethnic, institutional—must bow to the same gospel logic. Believers are called to treat the least privileged “as Paul,” indeed “as Christ” (Matthew 25:40). Any system reducing persons to commodities violates the Creator’s design and the Redeemer’s purchase.


Conclusion

Philemon 1:17 articulates the early Christian conviction that union with Christ transcends social stratification. By commanding Philemon to welcome Onesimus with apostolic honor, Paul plants within the Roman household a kingdom ethic that ultimately undermines slavery itself. The verse stands as a living testimony that in the new creation, “the old has passed away; behold, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17).

What historical context is essential to fully grasp the message of Philemon 1:17?
Top of Page
Top of Page