How does Proverbs 30:7 challenge the pursuit of wealth and poverty? Full Canonical Text “Two things I ask of You—do not refuse me before I die: keep falsehood and deceit far from me. Give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the bread that is my portion. Otherwise, I may have too much and deny You, saying, ‘Who is the LORD?’ Or I may become poor and steal, profaning the name of my God.” (Proverbs 30:7-9) Literary Placement and Authorship Agur son of Jakeh speaks these words near the close of Solomon’s collected Proverbs (Proverbs 30). The prayer is unique in Israel’s wisdom corpus for explicitly petitioning God for a middle path between two economic extremes. Within the chiastic structure of Proverbs 30, vv. 7-9 form the hinge that contrasts human finitude (“I am weary, O God,” v. 1) with the sufficiency of divine provision. Ancient Near-Eastern Background Contemporary wisdom texts (e.g., Egyptian “Instruction of Amenemope,” col. 7) likewise caution against extremes, yet none place the issue in theocentric terms. Agur’s prayer is thus distinct: economic status is evaluated by its effect on one’s relationship with Yahweh, not merely on social wellbeing. Theological Thrust—Sufficiency over Surplus 1. Wealth can incubate functional atheism: “I may have too much and deny You” (cf. Deuteronomy 8:11-14; Luke 12:16-21). 2. Poverty can tempt covenant violation: “I may…steal, profaning the name of my God” (cf. Proverbs 6:30-31; Ephesians 4:28). 3. The divine ideal is contentment with “daily bread” (Matthew 6:11), reinforcing dependence on the Creator rather than the created order. Wisdom’s Middle Way versus the Pursuit of Extremes Agur does not romanticize poverty nor idolize wealth. The prayer dismantles two false gospels: ascetic self-salvation and prosperity self-indulgence. Both distort God’s glory—one by despairing of His goodness, the other by displacing His supremacy. New Testament Parallels • 1 Timothy 6:6-10—contentment coupled with godliness. • Philippians 4:11-13—Paul’s learned sufficiency in “plenty and hunger.” • James 2:5-7—warning against economic favoritism and oppression. The continuity underscores biblical coherence from Old to New Covenants. Historical Illustrations • Manna Provision (Exodus 16): daily ration prevents hoarding, training trust. • Elijah & Widow of Zarephath (1 Kings 17): divine “portion” sustains during famine. • Early Church (Acts 4:34-35): resources redistributed so “there was no needy person,” balancing extremes within the body. Christological Fulfillment Jesus, “though He was rich, yet for your sakes became poor” (2 Corinthians 8:9), embodies Agur’s prayer by rejecting earthly excess (Matthew 8:20) and providing eternal riches (Ephesians 1:18). The cross and resurrection ground true security, rendering material extremes secondary. Ethical and Economic Implications for Believers 1. Budget for sufficiency; practice generosity (Proverbs 3:9-10). 2. Eschew get-rich-quick schemes (Proverbs 13:11). 3. Establish safeguards against desperation-driven sin: benevolence funds, community support. 4. Evaluate vocational choices by missional impact rather than salary alone. Pastoral and Discipleship Applications • Incorporate Agur’s prayer into personal devotions. • Teach financial stewardship courses rooted in Proverbs 30. • Use verse as diagnostic in counseling—asking whether anxiety or arrogance is driving money decisions. Conclusion Proverbs 30:7 challenges the restless chase for wealth and the fatalism of poverty by calling believers to daily dependence on Yahweh’s measured provision. In doing so, it guards the heart, upholds God’s honor, and directs one’s chief end—glorifying God and enjoying Him forever. |
    |