Ruth 1:4: God's inclusive plan?
How does Ruth 1:4 reflect God's inclusivity in His plan?

Text Of Ruth 1:4

“and they took Moabite wives; one was named Orpah and the other Ruth. And after they had lived in Moab about ten years,”


Historical Setting

Ruth’s events fall in the period of the Judges, c. 1300–1100 BC on a Ussher-style chronology, between the conquest under Joshua and the rise of Samuel. Famine drove Elimelech’s Bethlehem family east across the Dead Sea to Moab (modern-day Jordan). The Moabites descended from Lot (Genesis 19:37), often hostile to Israel (Numbers 22–25; Judges 3:12–30).


Literary Context

Ruth 1:4 appears after Naomi’s sons Mahlon and Chilion settle in Moab. The verse introduces two Gentile brides whose choices frame the book: Orpah returns to Moabite gods; Ruth cleaves to Yahweh (1:16–17). The verse is the narrative hinge by which an outsider enters redemptive history.


Theological Significance Of “Moabite Wives”

1. Breaking ethnic barriers: God’s covenant love (ḥesed) is not ethnically limited (cf. Genesis 12:3).

2. Providence in ordinary decisions: a seemingly routine marriage becomes salvific history.

3. Grace surpasses legal impediment: Deuteronomy 23:3 barred Moabites “to the tenth generation,” yet Ruth is welcomed because covenant faith outranks bloodline (cf. Isaiah 56:3; Acts 10:34-35).


God’S Inclusivity Unfolded

• Old Testament Precedent: Abrahamic promise—“all the families of the earth will be blessed through you” (Genesis 12:3). Ruth is an early down-payment on this global scope.

• Mosaic Provision: The law already envisioned the foreigner joining Israel (Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34). Ruth personifies that provision.

• Prophetic Anticipation: Isaiah foresaw foreigners joined to the LORD’s house (Isaiah 56:6-7). Ruth provides historical credibility to that prophecy.


Genealogical Implications

Ruth’s integration leads to Obed, Jesse, David (Ruth 4:17), anchoring Messianic prophecy (2 Samuel 7:12-16; Matthew 1:5-6). God deliberately writes Gentile blood into Messiah’s lineage, underscoring that salvation is for “every nation” (Revelation 7:9).


Covenant Pattern: Redemption Through Kinsman-Redeemer

Boaz, a type of Christ, redeems Ruth materially and legally (Ruth 4). Ruth’s faith secures her place; lineage does not. New-covenant fulfillment echoes this: “There is neither Jew nor Greek… for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).


New Testament Echoes

• Matthew includes Ruth in Jesus’ genealogy (Matthew 1:5), highlighting God’s intentional outreach.

• Peter’s vision (Acts 10) affirms God’s impartiality, anticipated by Ruth’s story.

• Paul’s “olive tree” metaphor (Romans 11) explains Ruth’s grafting-in dynamic.


Conclusion

Ruth 1:4’s brief notation that Naomi’s sons “took Moabite wives” showcases Yahweh’s inclusive, missionary heart. From a young-earth historical vantage, within a literarily and archaeologically substantiated record, God sovereignly weaves a Gentile woman into the Messiah’s lineage, prefiguring the gospel’s reach “to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8).

What significance do Ruth and Orpah hold in the lineage of Israel?
Top of Page
Top of Page