What is the meaning of Ruth 1:5? Both Mahlon and Chilion also died “Mahlon and Chilion also died” (Ruth 1:5) confronts us with the abrupt end of Elimelech’s family line in Moab. • Scripture records death as part of life in a fallen world (Genesis 3:19; Hebrews 9:27). • Their deaths follow Elimelech’s earlier death (Ruth 1:3), creating a triple loss that deepens the sense of judgment and sorrow (Deuteronomy 32:39; Job 1:21). • The line of Elimelech now hangs on Naomi and her daughters-in-law, underscoring the future need for a kinsman-redeemer (Ruth 4:14; Isaiah 54:5). • God’s providence continues even in tragedy, preparing the stage for redemption (Romans 8:28). Naomi was left without her two sons “…and Naomi was left without her two sons…” (Ruth 1:5) emphasizes Naomi’s emptiness. • Sons were viewed as a heritage and security (Psalm 127:3-5). • With no male heirs, Naomi faces economic vulnerability (Leviticus 25:25; Numbers 27:8-11). • The situation mirrors Jacob’s lament when he feared losing Joseph and Benjamin: “Everything is against me!” (Genesis 42:36). • Naomi’s forthcoming decision to return to Bethlehem reveals faith amid hopelessness (2 Corinthians 5:7). …and without her husband “…and without her husband” completes the picture of utter desolation. • Widowhood carried financial and social hardship (Deuteronomy 24:19-21; James 1:27). • Naomi’s loss sets the backdrop for Ruth’s loyal commitment and God’s care for widows (Psalm 68:5; 1 Timothy 5:3-5). • The absence of a husband necessitates the role of a kinsman-redeemer, foreshadowing Boaz and, ultimately, Christ (Ruth 2:20; Titus 2:13-14). summary Ruth 1:5 marks the lowest point in Naomi’s story: every earthly support—husband and sons—is gone. Yet this grim verse is not the end; it prepares the way for God’s redemptive plan. In Naomi’s emptiness, the Lord will soon fill her life through Ruth’s devotion and Boaz’s redemption, illustrating that even in our darkest moments, God’s faithful love is already at work. |
    |