Saul's spiritual state in 1 Sam 28:21?
What does 1 Samuel 28:21 reveal about Saul's spiritual state and leadership?

Historical Setting and Immediate Context

Saul, once anointed to shepherd Israel (1 Samuel 10:1), has progressively rejected God’s word (13:13–14; 15:23). By chapter 28 the Philistines mass at Shunem, Samuel is dead, and Saul, bereft of prophetic guidance, seeks illicit counsel at Endor. Verse 21 falls immediately after the necromantic encounter in which Samuel’s apparition announces Saul’s imminent death and loss of the kingdom (28:16–19). The narrative now shifts from the prophetic verdict to Saul’s reaction.


Text of 1 Samuel 28:21

“When the woman came to Saul and saw that he was terrified, she said, ‘Look, your maidservant has obeyed you. I have taken my life in my hands and done what you told me.’ ”


Violation of Covenant Law

Deut 18:10–12 expressly outlaws mediums; Leviticus 20:6 prescribes death for consulting them. Saul had earlier enforced this ban (1 Samuel 28:3,9), making his visit both hypocritical and apostate. Verse 21 underscores the irony: the outlawed medium now lectures the king who outlawed her.


Indicators of Saul’s Spiritual State

1. Terror Replacing Faith

The king who once rallied Israel “in the Spirit of God” (11:6) is now paralyzed. His fear is not strategic concern but despair—the fruit of divine abandonment he himself confesses (28:15).

2. Moral Inversion

Covenant violators guide him, while God’s prophets are silent. The medium speaks; Saul listens. Leadership has inverted: the throne bows to witchcraft.

3. Self-Preservation Over Obedience

Saul earlier “feared the people” (15:24); now he fears judgment. Terror rather than repentance governs him. There is no plea for mercy—only dread.

4. Isolation From God

God’s Spirit had departed (16:14); divine silence has become divine sentence. Verse 21 visually frames Saul alone with an outlaw and without Yahweh.


Leadership Collapse Evident in the Narrative Structure

• The Medium Initiates Care: She “came to Saul” (initiative) and offers instructions (vv. 22–23). Authority has shifted.

• Servant Language Reversed: She calls herself “maidservant,” yet commands the king to eat; Saul, the “king,” passively obeys (28:23).

• Public Responsibility Abandoned: While Israel’s army camps at Jezreel (28:4), Saul hides in an enemy-controlled village, absorbed in self-interest rather than national strategy.


Contrast With Earlier Saul

1 Samuel 11: Saul leads a nighttime assault to save Jabesh-Gilead—courageous, Spirit-empowered.

1 Samuel 14:47-48: He fights valiant campaigns.

Now he cowers, physically weakened (28:20) and psychologically broken (28:21). The verse marks the terminus of his kingship functionally before the battlefield ends it biologically (31:4).


Theological Implications

1. Inevitability of Divine Judgment

Persistent rebellion leads to irrevocable verdict (cf. Hebrews 10:26-31). The terror in v. 21 is anticipatory judgment realized in conscience.

2. Necromancy as False Mediator

By seeking the dead, Saul denies the living God. The episode foreshadows the binary Jesus presents: “He is not the God of the dead, but of the living” (Matthew 22:32).

3. Reversal Motif

God often humbles rulers who exalt themselves (Proverbs 29:23). Saul’s submission to the medium exemplifies this covenant principle.


Psychological and Behavioral Dimensions

• Acute Stress Reaction: Trembling, fasting-induced weakness (28:20) fit modern criteria for panic responses under catastrophic threat.

• Cognitive Dissonance: He enforced the ban yet violates it—generating internal conflict manifest as terror.

• Authority Displacement: Leaders stripped of moral certitude often outsource decision-making to illicit sources—a recurrent cultural phenomenon.


Archaeological and Textual Witnesses

• Dead Sea Scroll 4Q51 (4QSama) preserves 1 Samuel 28, confirming the Masoretic wording of Saul’s terror.

• Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th century BC) bear the priestly blessing (Numbers 6), demonstrating the covenant milieu that condemns necromancy in Saul’s era.

• The Tel-Rehov inscription lists cultic practices avoided by Yahwists, corroborating biblical prohibitions on witchcraft.


Cross-References Illustrating the Theme

• Fear as the fruit of disobedience: Leviticus 26:36; Proverbs 28:1.

• Silence of God to rebels: Proverbs 1:28; Micah 3:4.

• False counsel leading to downfall: 1 Kings 22:22-23; 2 Chronicles 18:21-22.


Contemporary Leadership Application

Leaders who sever connection with God inevitably fill the vacuum with forbidden substitutes—occult, ideology, or public opinion. Terror, burnout, and moral confusion follow. Faithful guidance requires obedience, repentance, and reliance on God’s revealed Word (2 Timothy 3:16-17).


Homiletical Angle

Illustration: A commander relying on hacked enemy frequencies for intel ensures defeat. Likewise, Saul’s consultation of spiritual “enemy frequencies” seals his doom. Exhortation: Seek God’s voice in Scripture, not forbidden channels.


Conclusion

1 Samuel 28:21 spotlights Saul’s spiritual bankruptcy and leadership implosion. Terror replaces trust, the outlaw leads the king, and covenant infidelity culminates in palpable dread. The verse is a sober reminder that estrangement from God forfeits both peace of soul and legitimacy of rule, validating the divine axiom: “Those who honor Me I will honor, but those who despise Me will be disdained” (1 Samuel 2:30).

How does 1 Samuel 28:21 challenge the belief in God's sovereignty and guidance?
Top of Page
Top of Page