Why is the marriage of Amram and Jochebed significant in Exodus 6:20? Canonical Text of Exodus 6:20 “Now Amram married his father’s sister Jochebed, who bore him Aaron and Moses. Amram lived 137 years.” (Exodus 6:20) Placement within the Levitical Genealogy Exodus 6:16-27 pauses the narrative to list Levi’s descendants. By naming Amram and Jochebed, Scripture anchors Moses and Aaron in a traceable, covenant-bearing line stretching from Abraham through Levi. The intercalation of genealogy amid the plague account reminds readers that Yahweh’s redemptive acts proceed through concrete families, not anonymous heroes. Continuity of the Patriarchal Covenant God pledged to Abraham that his offspring would be enslaved and later delivered (Genesis 15:13-14). The union of two pure-blooded Levites safeguards that covenantal thread. Moses—the deliverer—and Aaron—the high priest—both arise from a marriage that keeps the promise within the tribe set apart for priestly service (cf. Numbers 3:1-4). A Marriage that Preserved the Deliverer Egyptian infanticide targeted Hebrew boys (Exodus 1:15-22). Amram and Jochebed respond not with despair but with life, conceiving Moses amid genocide. Their action is an early instance of civil disobedience for God’s glory and directly leads to Israel’s liberation. Hebrews 11:23 commends this: “By faith Moses’ parents hid him for three months after his birth…they were not afraid of the king’s edict.” The marriage therefore becomes the human conduit for God’s miraculous preservation—one that foreshadows the empty tomb where another Deliverer would defeat a greater tyrant. Typological Foreshadowing of the Incarnation and Resurrection Moses is placed in an ark of reeds (Exodus 2:3), delivered from waters of death, named out of resurrection imagery (“I drew him out of the water,” 2:10). The marital union that produced him thus inaugurates a pattern: birth of a redeemer, apparent doom, miraculous rescue, ultimate salvation of God’s people. The pattern culminates in Christ, whose resurrection authenticates every Old Testament type (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Faith under Oppression and its New Testament Commendation The New Testament singles out Amram and Jochebed’s faith rather than their social status or power. Their marriage models covenant fidelity over cultural convenience, offering believers today an apologetic for biblical marriage that transcends shifting social norms (Ephesians 5:31-32). The Question of Intrafamilial Marriage and the Mosaic Law Leviticus 18:12 later forbids a man to marry his aunt, yet Amram does exactly that beforehand. Two truths reconcile the tension: 1. The law was not yet codified; moral accountability increases with revelation. 2. Early post-Flood genetics permitted close-kin marriages without the deleterious mutations common today (consistent with a young-earth timeline that places Amram only centuries after Noah, when the gene pool was less decayed). Chronological Significance within a Young-Earth Framework Ussher’s chronology puts Levi’s birth at 2315 BC, Amram’s at 2269 BC, and Moses’ at 1571 BC, compressing the sojourn in Egypt to 215 years (cf. Galatians 3:17). The genealogy of Exodus 6, therefore, is not a lengthy list but a tight bridge over which only four generations carry the covenant from Canaan to Sinai, harmonizing with a recent creation and Flood c. 4004 BC. Practical and Pastoral Applications 1. Covenant marriages matter: God chooses ordinary couples to accomplish extraordinary redemption. 2. Parenting is mission: the faith you nurture today can liberate nations tomorrow. 3. Fearless obedience precedes public deliverance: Amram and Jochebed’s quiet faith sets the stage for the plagues, Passover, and Sinai. 4. Scripture is self-authenticating and historically grounded: the precise genealogy silences claims of myth, rooting redemption in verifiable time and space. Conclusion The marriage of Amram and Jochebed is significant because it is the divinely orchestrated hinge between patriarchal promise and national deliverance. Their union preserves covenant purity, models courageous faith, anticipates Christ’s redemptive work, and stands as a testament to the reliability of Scripture’s historical record. |
    |