Why is the wisdom of Daniel mentioned in Ezekiel 28:3 significant? Text and Immediate Context “Behold, you are wiser than Daniel; no secret is hidden from you!” (Ezekiel 28:3). Ezekiel 28 is a prophetic oracle against the king of Tyre. Verses 2–5 expose the ruler’s arrogance: he boasts of possessing divine wisdom that grants him wealth and power. To unmask that hubris, God invokes a known benchmark of extraordinary God-given insight—Daniel—then sarcastically declares the king even wiser. The comparison only stings if Daniel’s reputation is already formidable and universally recognized among Ezekiel’s audience in the Babylonian exile (593–571 BC). Historical Daniel and His Reputation 1. Contemporaneity: Daniel was deported to Babylon in 605 BC (Daniel 1:1–6). Ezekiel began prophesying c. 593 BC. Both lived at the same time in the same empire, though Daniel served in the royal court and Ezekiel ministered to exiles by the Kebar Canal (Ezekiel 1:1). 2. Public renown: Daniel interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s dream that none of Babylon’s magi could solve (Daniel 2). He read the handwriting on Belshazzar’s wall (Daniel 5). Both incidents ended with royal proclamations praising Daniel’s exceptional wisdom (Daniel 2:48; 5:29). Those decrees would spread swiftly in an empire that kept meticulous court records (cf. Babylonian “Nebo-Sarsekim Tablet,” British Museum 34113, confirming Jeremiah 39:3). 3. Divine source: Scripture insists Daniel’s insight is revelatory, not innate (Daniel 2:19–23; 1:17). Thus Ezekiel’s ironic taunt underscores that the king of Tyre claims what only God grants. Implications for the Dating and Authenticity of Daniel Because Ezekiel alludes to Daniel’s fame while both men are alive, the reference supports a sixth-century composition of Daniel, not a late Maccabean fabrication. Manuscript evidence aligns: • Dead Sea Scrolls fragments 4QDan^a, 4QDan^b, 4QDan^c (c. 125 BC) show Daniel was already circulating and revered well before 165 BC. • The earliest Greek translation of Daniel precedes 100 BC, implying a Hebrew/Aramaic exemplar earlier still. • Babylonian cuneiform texts confirm the historicity of kings, titles, and chronology named in Daniel (e.g., “Belshazzar son of Nabonidus” in the Verse Account of Nabonidus, BM 38299). Refuting the ‘Ugaritic Danel’ Hypothesis Some suggest Ezekiel meant the mythic “Danel” of the Ugaritic Aqhat epic (14th c. BC). Yet: 1. Spelling: Ezekiel’s Hebrew דָּנִאֵל matches the biblical Daniel 100 % (consonantal דנאל), unlike Ugaritic DN’L. 2. Content: The Ugaritic Danel is famed for justice, not enigmatic wisdom or secret-revealing insight. 3. Audience familiarity: Exilic Jews knew Daniel personally; they had no cultural memory of a Canaanite legend embedded in discontinued cuneiform script. Theological Function in Ezekiel 28 1. Pride vs. Revelation: Daniel’s wisdom was characterized by humility—he credits “the God in heaven who reveals mysteries” (Daniel 2:28). The king of Tyre, by contrast, claims to be a god (Ezekiel 28:2). 2. Edenic Echoes: Ezekiel 28 later compares the ruler to the cherub in Eden (v. 13). Daniel’s narratives also juxtapose human rulers who exalt themselves (Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar) with the Most High who humbles them. 3. Judgment Paradigm: As Babylon’s kings fell after their arrogance (Daniel 4–5), so Tyre’s monarch would be hurled down (Ezekiel 28:7–10). Canonical Intertextuality • Daniel joins Solomon and Joseph as Scripture’s prime models of divinely endowed wisdom (1 Kings 4:29–34; Genesis 41:38–39). • Jesus later presents Himself as “greater than Solomon” (Matthew 12:42) and the ultimate revealer of mysteries (Colossians 2:3). Daniel thus foreshadows the Messiah’s perfect wisdom. Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • Babylonian ration tablets (E 32191, E 33476) list captive Judeans with status resembling Daniel and his friends—plausible administrative settings for their rise. • The Cyrus Cylinder (c. 539 BC) illustrates Persian policy of benevolent restoration, paralleling Daniel 6:28 and validating the milieu in which Daniel thrived under successive empires. • Tyre’s downfall was historically begun by Nebuchadnezzar (Josephus, Against Apion 1.156–160) and finalized by Alexander the Great in 332 BC, tracking Ezekiel 26–28’s long-range prophecy. Practical and Apologetic Significance 1. Reliability of Scripture: A sixth-century Ezekiel citing a living Daniel authenticates both books’ historicity and coherence. 2. Model of God-honoring Wisdom: Daniel exemplifies intellect submitted to revelation; human autonomy, epitomized by Tyre’s king, ends in ruin (Proverbs 16:18). 3. Evangelistic leverage: The fulfilled judgment on Tyre, affirmed by secular historians and modern archaeology of the island-causeway, undergirds the credibility of biblical prophecy when inviting skeptics to consider Christ’s resurrection—as historically secure as Daniel’s vindicated insight (1 Corinthians 15:3–8). Conclusion The brief mention of Daniel’s wisdom in Ezekiel 28:3 is a linchpin text: it confirms Daniel’s early, widespread reputation; reinforces the canonical unity and antiquity of Scripture; contrasts God-given revelation with arrogant self-deification; and furnishes an apologetic foothold for the reliability of biblical prophecy, history, and ultimately the gospel. |
    |