What significance do the high places hold in 2 Kings 23:13? Canonical Text (2 Kings 23:13) “The king also desecrated the high places east of Jerusalem, to the south of the Mount of Corruption, which Solomon king of Israel had built for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Sidonians, for Chemosh the abomination of Moab, and for Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.” Geographical and Linguistic Background of “High Places” (Hebrew bāmôt) • bāmâ literally means “elevation.” In the ANE it designated cultic platforms on ridges, terraced hillsides, or artificial mounds. • 2 Kings 23:13 pinpoints a ridge on the southeastern slope of the Mount of Olives. Excavations on Ras es-Ṣûfa and adjacent knolls have revealed Iron II cultic installations—standing stones, ash layers, ceramic votive pieces—consistent with 10th–7th century BC idolatrous use. • The location’s later nickname, “Mount of Corruption” (har ha-mašḥît), reflects centuries of moral decay stemming from unrepentant idolatry. Historical Development of High Places in Israel 1. Patriarchal altars (Genesis 12:7-8; 22:2) were provisional and Yahwistic. 2. After Sinai, Deuteronomy centralized worship: “You are to destroy all the high places … you are not to worship the LORD your God in that way” (Deuteronomy 12:2-5). 3. During the Judges and early monarchy, high places multiplied (Judges 3:7; 1 Samuel 7:16). Often syncretistic, they blurred fidelity to the covenant. 4. By Solomon’s reign, political marriages imported formal shrines to foreign deities (1 Kings 11:4-8). The very hill in 2 Kings 23:13 was erected circa 960 BC. 5. Successive kings either tolerated (e.g., Asa, Jehoshaphat) or promoted (e.g., Manasseh) idolatrous high places until Josiah’s purge (640-609 BC). The Solomonic Origins of the Specific High Places Near Jerusalem • Ashtoreth, Chemosh, and Milcom represent Phoenician, Moabite, and Ammonite pantheons. Each demanded fertility rites or even child sacrifice (Jeremiah 32:35). • Archaeological correlation: the Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone, ca. 840 BC) boasts of King Mesha’s devotion to Chemosh and names the deity exactly as in 2 Kings 23:13. • Solomon’s compromise fractured the first commandment and set the trajectory for national apostasy, fulfilling Deuteronomy 17:17’s warning that foreign wives would turn the king’s heart. Josiah’s Reform and Covenant Restoration • Josiah’s action fulfills the unnamed prophet’s prediction in 1 Kings 13:2. • By defiling (ṭimᵊ’ = render ritually unclean) and pulverizing the cult sites, Josiah obeyed Deuteronomy 12:3 literally—smash, burn, obliterate. • His reform coincided with the rediscovery of “the Book of the Law” (likely Deuteronomy), underscoring Sola Scriptura antecedents. • Chronologically, Josiah’s purge prepared the theological ground for exile: Judah could no longer claim ignorance when judgment arrived (2 Kings 24–25). Theological Significance: Exclusive Yahwistic Worship • High places symbolize every attempt to elevate human-devised religion above God’s revelation. • Their removal reasserts Yahweh’s uniqueness (Isaiah 45:5) and anticipates Jesus’ declaration that true worship is “in spirit and truth” (John 4:24), not bound to geographic mountains. • Cutting down pagan altars typologically foreshadows Christ’s ultimate triumph over principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15). Typological and Christological Connections • Mount of Olives—site of ancient corruption—becomes the very mount from which Jesus ascends (Acts 1:9-12), turning a place of idolatry into a launch point for global gospel proclamation. • Where Solomon’s unfaithfulness spawned apostasy, the Greater-than-Solomon’s obedience secures everlasting kingship (Matthew 12:42; Hebrews 1:8). Archaeological Corroboration • Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (late 7th c. BC) preserving the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24-26) attest to contemporaneous Jerusalemite Yahwism amid Josiah’s era. • Tel Arad ostraca confirm Judean administrators enforcing tithe shipments to “the house of YHWH.” • Bullae bearing names of biblical officials (e.g., Gemariah son of Shaphan) ground the reform narrative in verifiable history. • Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4QKings parallels the Masoretic wording of 2 Kings 23, demonstrating textual stability from 3rd c. BC onward. Practical and Devotional Implications • Modern “high places” emerge as intellectual idols—materialism, relativism, self-worship. The believer, like Josiah, is called to decisive demolition (2 Corinthians 10:4-5). • Behavioral science confirms that entrenched habits (idols) require replacement with superior affection; Scripture supplies both motivation and means (Psalm 119:11). • Community accountability, evident in Josiah’s national covenant, remains vital for sustained reform (Hebrews 10:24-25). |
    |