What is the meaning of 1 Samuel 20:32? Why must he be put to death? • Jonathan challenges Saul’s decree, holding it up against God’s standard of justice (Exodus 23:7; Deuteronomy 17:6). • His question exposes the irrational fear and jealousy driving Saul rather than any lawful reason (1 Samuel 18:8–9; 19:10). • The statement models how believers should weigh every human command against the clear teaching of Scripture (Acts 5:29). Jonathan replied. • Jonathan steps into the role of an intercessor, risking royal wrath for the sake of truth and covenant loyalty to David (1 Samuel 20:13–17). • His reply embodies courageous love that “protects, trusts, hopes, perseveres” (1 Corinthians 13:7) and honors the command to defend the innocent (Proverbs 31:8–9). • By confronting his own father, Jonathan shows that allegiance to God’s righteousness surpasses family or political allegiance (Matthew 10:37; Luke 14:26). What has he done? • Jonathan points to David’s blameless record—victories for Israel, loyalty to Saul, and obedience to the Lord (1 Samuel 19:4–5; 18:14–16). • The question underscores the biblical principle that punishment must be tied to proven wrongdoing (Numbers 35:30; Romans 13:3–4). • Echoes of this cry for justice appear later when Pilate asks about Jesus, “What evil has He done?” (Luke 23:22), highlighting how the innocent are often targeted by corrupt power. summary 1 Samuel 20:32 captures Jonathan’s fearless defense of an innocent friend before an unjust king. He appeals to God’s standards of justice, places covenant faithfulness above personal safety, and exposes the baseless nature of Saul’s rage. The verse challenges believers to test every accusation by Scripture, speak up for the innocent, and remain loyal to God’s righteous ways even when it costs dearly. |
    |