What is the meaning of 2 Chronicles 3:3? The foundation that Solomon laid When the Chronicler says, “The foundation that Solomon laid,” he points to a concrete moment in Israel’s history when the king personally oversaw the first stones of the temple. This was not a symbolic start; it was the literal base that would support every course of masonry above it. • Other passages emphasize Solomon’s hands-on role: “Then Solomon began to build the house of the LORD in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah” (2 Chron 3:1). • Centuries later, Ezra looked back on this same foundation while rebuilding the second temple (Ezra 3:10–11), underscoring its enduring importance. • The principle endures for believers today: “No one can lay a foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:11). Earthly temples rest on stone; the church rests on Christ Himself. for the house of God The phrase clarifies that the structure was not Solomon’s palace but “the house of God,” the dwelling place for His name (1 Kings 8:13; 2 Chron 2:5-6). • The ark of the covenant would reside here (2 Chron 5:7), marking the meeting point between heaven and earth. • God’s choice of Jerusalem echoes earlier revelations: “The place the LORD your God will choose for His Name” (Deuteronomy 12:5). • By calling it God’s house, Scripture reminds us that worship is directed to Him alone, rejecting idolatry (Exodus 20:3-4). The temple’s very identity guards orthodoxy. was sixty cubits long and twenty cubits wide The narrator supplies exact dimensions—about 90 ft × 30 ft (27 m × 9 m)—corresponding to the holy place and the most holy place combined (1 Kings 6:2). • Precision matters because God ordered it (Exodus 25:9; 1 Chron 28:11-19). Every measurement testifies that the Lord values detail and excellence. • The temple doubled the footprint of the tabernacle (Exodus 26:16-23), signaling a move from portability to permanence. • Though grand for its day, these measurements are modest beside the glory they housed, hinting that God’s presence, not human scale, supplies the splendor (Isaiah 66:1-2). according to the old standard The Chronicler notes that Solomon used “the old standard,” likely the royal cubit (about 18 in/45 cm). • This parenthetical remark assures readers that the measurements are trustworthy, rooted in an accepted benchmark. God’s Word leaves no room for arbitrary guesses (Proverbs 30:5). • By specifying the traditional measure, Scripture connects Solomon’s work to earlier divine patterns—continuity from tabernacle to temple (Exodus 25:40). • For modern readers, it signals that biblical history rests on real times, places, and units, reinforcing the factual reliability of God’s record (Luke 1:1-4). summary 2 Chronicles 3:3 presents more than architectural data. It grounds Solomon’s temple in literal history, shows its exclusive dedication to the Lord, records dimensions that reflect both obedience and glory, and affirms the accuracy of biblical measurement. In every stone and cubit, the verse calls God’s people to build their worship, their lives, and their hope on the sure foundation He Himself has laid. |
    |