What does Acts 14:28 mean?
What is the meaning of Acts 14:28?

And

• This tiny connector ties verse 28 to the sweeping story that has just unfolded. Paul and Barnabas have reported “all that God had done through them” (Acts 14:27).

• The Spirit’s work didn’t pause with their report; the conjunction reminds us God’s mission is ongoing. Compare the flow-through effect in Acts 13:49 and Acts 15:35, where the narrative keeps rolling from one ministry scene to the next.


they spent a long time

• Luke highlights intentional, extended presence—not a hurried visit.

• Paul had earlier modeled prolonged investment in Antioch (“for a whole year they met with the church,” Acts 11:26) and would later do so in Corinth (“a year and six months,” Acts 18:11).

• Why stay?

– To teach and ground new believers (Acts 15:32).

– To model steadfastness (2 Timothy 3:14).

– To allow spiritual gifts to mature within the body (Ephesians 4:11-13).


there

• Location matters; “there” is Antioch in Syria, the sending church that first laid hands on them (Acts 13:1-3).

• Returning to the home base:

– Affirms accountability (Acts 14:26-27).

– Strengthens the local congregation so it can keep sending (Acts 15:40).

– Demonstrates that mission and local church health are inseparable.


with the disciples

• Ministry is relational: they remained “with” rather than “over” the believers.

• Marks of this together-life:

– Fellowship and shared meals (Acts 2:42).

– Mutual encouragement (“spur one another on,” Hebrews 10:24-25).

– Love as the family identity badge (John 13:34-35).

• The word “disciples” reminds us every believer is a learner who keeps growing, not a mere spectator.


summary

Acts 14:28 captures more than an itinerary; it paints a portrait of gospel ministry that is continuous (“And”), committed (“a long time”), contextual (“there”), and communal (“with the disciples”). The verse invites us to value sustained presence, accountability to a local church, and deep fellowship as vital expressions of Christ’s ongoing mission.

How does Acts 14:27 challenge the idea of exclusivity in salvation?
Top of Page
Top of Page