What is the meaning of Genesis 27:9? Go out to the flock • Rebekah’s first directive is simple and literal—Jacob must leave the tent and head straight for their own animals (Genesis 27:8 right before it). • The command mirrors Isaac’s earlier words to Esau, “Go out to the field” (Genesis 27:3-4); Rebekah is intentionally substituting Jacob for Esau. • Scripture consistently shows that God works through everyday actions—going, fetching, tending (compare Exodus 3:1; 1 Samuel 17:20). The ordinary becomes the stage for divine purpose. • The flock belongs to the covenant family, underscoring God’s provision inside the household rather than from wild game; this hints at divine preference for what He supplies, not human hunting skill (Genesis 22:13). and bring me two choice young goats • “Two” signals completeness for Rebekah’s plan: one for the meal, one for the disguise (Genesis 27:16). • “Choice” shows intentional selection—nothing second-rate will serve in fulfilling what God foretold in Genesis 25:23. • Goats were common food and sacrificial animals (Leviticus 1:10; 10:16); here they become instruments of God’s unfolding covenant promise. • Rebekah’s decisiveness contrasts with Esau’s delayed hunt, speeding events toward the blessing (Proverbs 19:21). so that I can make them into a tasty dish for your father • Rebekah owns the preparation: “I can make,” highlighting her knowledge of Isaac’s palate (Genesis 27:14-17). • The phrase ties back to Isaac’s request of Esau, showing Rebekah intends to match the flavor exactly (Genesis 27:4). • Food often precedes covenant moments—Melchizedek’s bread and wine (Genesis 14:18), the Passover lamb (Exodus 12:8)—signaling that God uses meals to advance His redemptive plan. • The cooking itself becomes a tool for God’s sovereignty over human senses (Psalm 34:8). the kind he loves • Isaac’s partiality is stated earlier: “Isaac loved Esau because he had a taste for wild game” (Genesis 25:28). Rebekah leverages that weakness. • Love of the dish exposes Isaac’s vulnerability to fleshly appetite, reminding readers of Eve’s attraction to the fruit (Genesis 3:6) and Israel’s later craving for meat (Numbers 11:4-6). • Yet God overrides human bias; despite Isaac’s love of Esau’s food, the blessing will rest on Jacob as foretold (Romans 9:10-13). • This moment underscores that God’s purposes prevail even when driven by imperfect human motivations (Proverbs 16:9). summary Genesis 27:9 shows Rebekah directing Jacob step-by-step to secure Isaac’s blessing. Each phrase highlights ordinary actions—going, selecting, cooking—that God weaves into His sovereign, foretold plan. Human appetites and family dynamics are real, but they cannot derail the promise first spoken to Abraham and then to Rebekah. Through simple goats and a well-loved meal, the Lord moves His covenant forward, demonstrating that He rules over both the mundane and the monumental. |
    |