What does Jeremiah 22:28 mean?
What is the meaning of Jeremiah 22:28?

Is this man Coniah

Jeremiah points to Jehoiachin (also called Coniah or Jeconiah), the young king who reigned only three months before Babylon seized him (2 Kings 24:8-9; 2 Chronicles 36:9-10). Though born into David’s royal line, he followed the sins of his fathers, ignoring the covenant and the prophets (Jeremiah 22:24-26). The question sounds almost rhetorical: “Is this man Coniah…?” The implied answer is yes—he has forfeited the privileges of kingship. God’s verdict shows that pedigree alone does not guarantee blessing; faithful obedience does (Deuteronomy 17:18-20; John 8:39-40).


a despised and shattered pot

Jeremiah had earlier smashed a clay jar before the elders to picture Judah’s coming ruin (Jeremiah 19:10-11). Now the Lord likens Coniah to that broken vessel.

• Broken pottery cannot be repaired—symbolizing irreversible judgment (Psalm 2:9).

• Being “despised” underscores rejection by both God and people (Jeremiah 15:4).

• The image recalls the potter-and-clay lessons of Jeremiah 18:1-6, where the vessel becomes unusable when it resists the potter’s design. Coniah resisted God’s shaping hand, so he is shattered.


a jar that no one wants?

An unwanted jar has no practical value; it is tossed aside. Similarly, Coniah is deemed unfit to lead the covenant nation. Romans 9:21 notes the difference between “honorable” and “common” vessels, and 2 Timothy 2:20 urges believers to be “vessels for honor.” Coniah illustrates the opposite: a vessel dishonored by disobedience (Hosea 8:8).


Why are he and his descendants hurled out

The Lord explains the “why” throughout Jeremiah 22:

• Coniah’s father Jehoiakim “shed innocent blood” and “practiced oppression” (Jeremiah 22:17).

• Both father and son ignored God’s call to covenant faithfulness (Jeremiah 22:3-5).

• Because the king leads the nation, his rebellion brings collective consequences (2 Kings 23:36-37).

The hurling motif shows forceful removal; God personally expels them, fulfilling His warning that unfaithful rulers would be thrust from office (1 Samuel 15:23; Psalm 75:6-7).


and cast into a land they do not know?

Jehoiachin and his household were deported to Babylon in 597 BC (2 Kings 24:15-16). Exile was no accident; it fulfilled covenant curses pronounced centuries earlier: “The LORD will bring you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you” (Deuteronomy 28:36).

• The phrase “a land they do not know” emphasizes alienation—far from the temple, the people, and the promises (Psalm 137:1-4).

• Yet even in exile God preserved a remnant and promised restoration (Jeremiah 29:10-14; Ezekiel 17:22-24).

• Remarkably, though Coniah’s royal line was cut off from the throne (Jeremiah 22:30), God later wove his genealogy into the messianic line culminating in Jesus (Matthew 1:11-12), demonstrating both judgment and grace.


summary

Jeremiah 22:28 portrays Coniah as a broken, unwanted vessel—a vivid picture of divine judgment on a king who rejected God’s rule. His downfall shows that heritage without holiness leads to ruin, and that God keeps His covenant warnings as surely as His promises. Even in exile, the Lord remained sovereign, working through judgment to advance His redemptive plan.

What theological implications does Jeremiah 22:27 have on the concept of divine punishment?
Top of Page
Top of Page