What is the meaning of Jeremiah 52:1? Zedekiah was twenty-one years old when he became king • At twenty-one, Zedekiah was still in the formative stage of adulthood. Scripture repeatedly notes the age of kings (2 Kings 24:18; 2 Chronicles 36:11) to help us grasp the maturity—or lack of it—behind their early decisions. • Being appointed by Nebuchadnezzar after the deportation of Jehoiachin (2 Kings 24:17) meant Zedekiah stepped into a throne already under foreign control. The verse reminds us that God’s Word records these details to show how Judah’s leadership had shifted into dependence on Babylon, fulfilling warnings like Jeremiah 25:8-9. • His youth combined with the political pressure of Babylon set the stage for the spiritual compromises that followed (Jeremiah 38:19-20). and he reigned in Jerusalem eleven years • Eleven years (597-586 BC) sounds substantial, yet compared with the forty-year reign of his father Josiah (2 Kings 22:1) it was brief—a marker of instability and divine judgment (Jeremiah 24:8-10). • Those years ended in Jerusalem’s destruction (Jeremiah 52:12-14), affirming the prophetic timeline God had declared through Jeremiah 25:11: “This whole land will become a desolate wasteland, and these nations will serve the king of Babylon seventy years”. • The location “in Jerusalem” stresses that the covenant city itself was no shield when its king rejected the Lord’s word (2 Chronicles 36:12-16). His mother’s name was Hamutal daughter of Jeremiah • Scripture often names a king’s mother to trace covenant faithfulness or lack thereof (1 Kings 15:2; 2 Kings 14:2). With Hamutal, the same mother of Jehoahaz (2 Kings 23:31), we see a family line linked to two sons who both faltered spiritually, contrasting sharply with their godly grandfather Josiah (2 Kings 23:25). • The mention of “Jeremiah” here is not the prophet but Hamutal’s father, underscoring that identical names can appear in different family trees while the biblical record remains precise (cf. Jeremiah 35:3). • A king’s maternal influence was significant; yet even if Hamutal followed Josiah’s piety, her sons still chose rebellion, echoing Ezekiel 18:20 on personal responsibility. she was from Libnah • Libnah, a Levitical town in Judah (Joshua 21:13; 2 Kings 8:22), reminds us that Zedekiah’s heritage included priestly associations. Levitical roots should have directed him toward covenant obedience (Deuteronomy 33:8-10), but he chose otherwise. • Libnah’s earlier revolt against Judah in Joram’s day (2 Kings 8:22) pictures a city familiar with resisting ungodly rule—yet another historical echo that obedience to God, not political maneuvering, secures blessing. • By locating Hamutal in Libnah, Jeremiah 52:1 anchors the narrative in literal geography, reinforcing the historical reliability of the account. summary Jeremiah 52:1 compresses four factual statements: Zedekiah’s youth, his eleven-year reign under Babylonian shadow, his maternal lineage, and that lineage’s roots in Libnah. Each detail highlights God’s sovereign oversight of Judah’s history: youthful inexperience met foreign dominance, a short reign culminated in prophesied judgment, familial heritage revealed the tug-of-war between covenant privilege and personal rebellion, and the geographic note affirmed the concrete reality of these events. Taken together, the verse sets the stage for the chapter’s sober record of Jerusalem’s fall, underscoring that God’s word is both historically precise and spiritually instructive. |
    |