What is the meaning of Joshua 17:10? Ephraim to the south “Ephraim’s territory was to the south...” (Joshua 17:10) • This half-tribe of Joseph received the land described in Joshua 16. God’s allocation put them just above the tribe of Benjamin and below their brother-tribe, Manasseh (compare Joshua 16:5–9; 17:8). • The southward placement fulfilled Jacob’s prophetic blessing that Ephraim would be “greater” (Genesis 48:19), situating them in fertile hill-country that later housed Shiloh, the first central sanctuary (Joshua 18:1). • By keeping Ephraim nearer the tabernacle’s early locations—first at Gilgal, then Shiloh—God placed spiritual responsibility alongside geographic privilege (Deuteronomy 12:5). Manasseh to the north “...and Manasseh’s was to the north...” • West-Manasseh’s allotment stretched from the Kishon Valley in the north down toward Ephraim’s border in the south (Joshua 17:7–11). • This northern position balanced Joseph’s descendants on both sides of Ephraim, honoring both sons while reflecting Jacob’s order of blessing (Genesis 48:13–20). • Manasseh’s northern reach positioned the tribe as a buffer against Phoenician and later foreign influences, showing God’s strategic care for Israel’s security (Judges 5:14-18). The Sea as the western border “...having the Sea as its border...” • “The Sea” points to the Great Sea—the Mediterranean (Numbers 34:6; Joshua 15:12). • A western coastline gave both tribes direct access to maritime trade routes, yet it also required faithfulness to resist Canaanite coastal idolatry (Exodus 23:32–33). • The verse underscores God’s precise boundary-setting—a theme echoed in Acts 17:26, where He “determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their lands.” Meeting Asher on the north “...and adjoining Asher on the north...” • Manasseh’s territory touched Asher’s inheritance, allocated later in Joshua 19:24-31. • This junction formed a three-tribe intersection (Manasseh, Asher, Naphtali), illustrating the interwoven unity God intended for the tribes (Psalm 133:1). • Asher’s northern coastline and Manasseh’s inland valleys complemented each other agriculturally—another evidence of divine design for mutual dependence (Deuteronomy 33:24-25). Bordering Issachar on the east “...and Issachar on the east.” • Manasseh’s eastern edge met Issachar’s plains (Joshua 19:17-23), an area famous for fruitful Jezreel Valley harvests (1 Kings 21:1-2). • Judges 1:27 recounts Manasseh’s partial failure to expel Canaanites from cities in Issachar’s region, reminding readers that possessing boundaries required ongoing obedience. • The eastward link meant the tribes shared both challenges and blessings of the fertile lowlands (Deuteronomy 33:18-19), encouraging cooperation in cultivation and defense. summary Joshua 17:10 lays out a carefully balanced inheritance: Ephraim nestled to the south, Manasseh spread to the north, both anchored by the Mediterranean on the west and interconnected with Asher and Issachar on the north and east. The verse highlights God’s meticulous boundary-setting, the complementary roles of Joseph’s sons, and the call for faithful stewardship of the territory He assigns. |
    |