What is the meaning of Joshua 17:3? Zelophehad son of Hepher - Scripture immediately sets the scene by naming Zelophehad, anchoring the narrative in real history (Genesis 5:1). - The mention reminds readers that God tracks every individual within His covenant family, not just prominent leaders (Exodus 28:29). - Numbers 26:33 first introduced Zelophehad as a man of the tribe of Manasseh who died in the wilderness; Joshua picks up that same lineage to highlight continuity of God’s promises (Numbers 14:30-32). (the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh) - This extended genealogy shows that Zelophehad’s line flows from the patriarch Joseph through Manasseh, validating the daughters’ legal standing (Genesis 50:23). - Each name carries covenant weight: • Manasseh—fruitfulness despite adversity (Genesis 41:51). • Machir—firstborn of Manasseh, known for strength in battle (Numbers 32:39-40). • Gilead—forefather of a region famous for balm and healing (Jeremiah 8:22). - By rehearsing these generations, Joshua confirms that land allotment honors earlier divine assignments (Numbers 34:14). had no sons but only daughters - In an inheritance culture centered on male heirs, this line highlights an apparent problem yet invites faith that God’s law covers every contingency (Deuteronomy 21:17). - The phrasing recalls the daughters’ earlier appeal to Moses when they feared their father’s name would vanish (Numbers 27:3-4). - God answered through Moses, establishing a precedent that daughters inherit when no sons exist (Numbers 27:6-7). Joshua now implements that ruling, underscoring God’s unchanging justice. These are the names of his daughters - Naming each daughter individualizes them—unusual in ancient records—showing God’s personal regard for women as image-bearers (Genesis 1:27). - Their names have resonances of hope: “Mahlah” (song), “Noah” (movement), “Hoglah” (dancing), “Milcah” (queen), “Tirzah” (delight). While Scripture doesn’t expound on meanings here, the listing itself testifies to dignity and destiny (Psalm 16:5-6). - The fact that their petition succeeded confirms that faith expressed in obedience is rewarded (Hebrews 11:6). Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah - Joshua 17:4 records they “approached Eleazar the priest, Joshua son of Nun, and the leaders” and received an inheritance “in accordance with the LORD’s command.” Their action models respectful, orderly petition before God-given authority (Romans 13:1). - Their inheritance lay amid the allotments of Manasseh, fulfilling the oath that every tribe and family would possess a portion in the promised land (Joshua 14:5). - Their story foreshadows the inclusive nature of God’s kingdom, later realized in Christ where “there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28), without erasing distinct callings. summary Joshua 17:3 affirms God’s meticulous faithfulness to individuals, families, and tribes. By rehearsing Zelophehad’s lineage, Scripture verifies the daughters’ rightful claim. Their unique situation—no brothers—highlights the adequacy of God’s law and His respect for women. Their bold yet orderly appeal, honored by Joshua, showcases the Lord’s commitment to justice and covenant promise. The verse thus teaches that every believer, regardless of status, can trust God to secure their inheritance in His perfect timing. |
    |