What does Psalm 106:40 mean?
What is the meaning of Psalm 106:40?

So

Psalm 106 has just cataloged Israel’s repeated rebellion. The little word “So” links that history to God’s response. Because Israel “rejected His statutes and despised His covenant” (2 Kings 17:15), this consequence is not random but logical. Like a parent who has warned many times, the Lord now moves from patience to discipline (Hebrews 12:6).


the anger of the LORD

This is not capricious rage but righteous indignation arising from God’s holy character (Isaiah 5:25). His anger is always measured and just, never sinful (James 1:20). Scripture shows the same pattern when Israel worshiped the golden calf—“the LORD’s anger burned” (Exodus 32:10)—yet even then Moses could intercede, proving that wrath and mercy are perfectly balanced in God (Psalm 30:5).


burned

A fire image highlights intensity and purity. Fire consumes what is corrupt while refining what is precious (Malachi 3:2-3). Here it consumes. Similar language appears when “the fire of the LORD burned among them” in the wilderness (Numbers 11:1-3). Rebellion piles up combustible material; eventually holiness ignites it (Deuteronomy 32:22).


against His people

The covenant nation is in view, not surrounding pagans. Privilege heightens accountability (Amos 3:2). Though chosen, Israel is not exempt from discipline—if anything, they experience it first (1 Peter 4:17). God’s love for His people includes correction that may feel fierce but intends restoration (Jeremiah 30:11).


and He abhorred

“Abhorred” conveys deep revulsion. Israel’s idolatry made what was meant to be holy appear repulsive (Jeremiah 44:4). God’s disgust is moral, not emotional whim. Leviticus 26:30 uses identical wording when Israel’s high places provoke disgust. The covenant imagery shows that sin violates relational intimacy, much like adultery in marriage (Hosea 1:2).


His own inheritance

A stunning phrase—Israel is “the LORD’s portion” (Deuteronomy 32:9). Yet the Owner disowns what is polluted. Possession does not override purity. Even the land “vomited out” its inhabitants when corrupted (Leviticus 18:28), so God’s inheritance can experience temporary rejection. Still, the covenant is not annulled; exile leads to eventual regathering (Ezekiel 36:24-28).


summary

Psalm 106:40 teaches that persistent, unrepentant sin kindles God’s righteous anger, even toward those He has chosen as His special possession. The verse stands as a sober reminder: privilege invites accountability, holiness demands purity, and love will discipline. Yet the wider psalm also shows that divine wrath is never the last word; confession and covenant mercy ultimately prevail (Psalm 106:44-45).

How does Psalm 106:39 challenge modern views on moral relativism?
Top of Page
Top of Page