What historical context influenced the writing of Psalm 59:7? Superscription as Primary Indicator Psalm 59 opens with the heading, “For the choirmaster. To the tune of ‘Do Not Destroy.’ A Miktam of David, when Saul sent men to watch his house in order to kill him” . Ancient Hebrew headings form part of the inspired text; they appear in the Masoretic tradition, the Septuagint, and the Dead Sea Scrolls (11Q5), confirming that the psalm is anchored to a real episode in David’s life. The heading establishes the immediate historical context—Saul’s assassination squad surrounding David’s home—without which verse 7 cannot be fully grasped. Events of 1 Samuel 19 1 Samuel 19:11-17 narrates the incident. Saul, gripped by jealousy, orders agents to murder David by morning. Michal lowers her husband through a window, while decoys in the bed buy him critical time to flee. The psalm’s description of enemies prowling at night (vv.6, 14), and its portrait of taunting words “swords are in their lips—for they say, ‘Who hears?’ ” (v.7), fit the psychological terror of being hunted in one’s own city, Gibeah of Benjamin. Chronological Placement in Israel’s Early Monarchy Ussher’s chronology places Saul’s reign c. 1050-1010 BC and David’s flight around 1029-1028 BC. The monarchy is still young; tribal loyalties are fluid, and Philistine pressure remains intense. David—already anointed yet not enthroned—lives in a liminal space: God’s chosen king, but a fugitive. Psalm 59 is thus one of the earliest compositions of the Davidic corpus, predating his wilderness psalms (e.g., Psalm 57 at Adullam). Political Climate Under Saul Saul’s kingdom was centralized in Gibeah but fraught with court intrigue. Military successes (1 Samuel 14) bred popularity for David, provoking Saul’s paranoia. Royal assassination was a common ancient Near Eastern tactic; Egyptian “instructions” to courtiers and Hittite annals mention similar palace purges. Against that backdrop, Psalm 59:7 depicts the assassins’ arrogance: they assume impunity because the highest earthly authority, the king, sent them. David’s Personal Crisis and Literary Response The psalm reveals David’s pattern: convert crisis into prayerful song. Verse 7’s imagery—“they spew from their mouths”—echoes battlefield taunts David had faced from Goliath (1 Samuel 17:43-44). Here, however, the threat is covert and domestic. By recording the moment, David preserves a didactic model: believers may articulate fear without surrendering to it, trusting Yahweh to “laugh at them” (v.8). Cultural and Linguistic Notes 1. “Belch out” (Heb. נָבַע nabāʿ) portrays uncontrolled outflow, used elsewhere of springs (Proverbs 18:4). David likens speech to violent discharge—propaganda as weapon. 2. “Swords are in their lips” employs metonymy. Ancient law codes (e.g., Lipit-Ishtar §11) treated slander as assault; words could incite bloodshed. 3. “Who hears?” mirrors the impious refrain of pagan foes (cf. Psalm 10:11). The line exposes practical atheism: even covenant members can live as if God is deaf. Archaeological Corroboration of the Davidic Era • The Tel Dan stele (9th century BC) names the “House of David,” verifying a dynastic founder consistent with the Samuel narrative. • Khirbet Qeiyafa ostracon (c. 1000 BC) exhibits early Judaean administrative script, debunking claims that Israel lacked literate culture in David’s time. A literate warrior-poet composing Psalm 59 is entirely plausible. • Bullae from the City of David bearing names akin to those in 1 Samuel corroborate a functioning royal bureaucracy contemporaneous with Saul and David. Theological Implications of Historical Setting David’s experience previews Messiah-Jesus, who also faced state-sponsored plots (Matthew 26:3-4). Verse 7’s insolent question, “Who hears?” is answered ultimately at the empty tomb; God heard and vindicated His Anointed by resurrection (Acts 2:24-32). The psalm therefore functions both as historical lament and prophetic pattern. Pastoral and Devotional Application Knowing the concrete setting—nighttime siege, political betrayal—prevents reducing Psalm 59 to abstraction. Believers today confronting institutional hostility can echo David’s words, confident that the same God who “is my strength” (v.9) still intervenes. Historical context transforms verse 7 from a curious metaphor into living testimony of divine surveillance over every unjust word spoken against the righteous. |
    |