What historical context influenced the commandment in Deuteronomy 5:20? Text Of The Command “Do not give false testimony against your neighbor.” (Deuteronomy 5:20) Moses is recounting the Ten Words to the “second generation” of the Exodus on the plains of Moab in the 40th year after leaving Egypt (Deuteronomy 1:3). The setting fixes the date at roughly 1406 BC, within a lifetime of Israel’s deliverance. Literary And Covenant Frame Deuteronomy restates the Sinai covenant (Exodus 20) in the pattern of an ancient Near-Eastern suzerain-vassal treaty: preamble, historical prologue, stipulations, witnesses, sanctions, and succession arrangements. The ninth word (our verse) lies among clauses that protect life, marriage, property, and speech—each essential to covenant faithfulness and community survival in Canaan. Social Realities Of Early Israel 1. A purely oral legal culture. Written records were scarce; court cases depended on eyewitnesses (Deuteronomy 19:15). 2. Decentralized tribal courts. Elders judged “at the gate” (Deuteronomy 16:18). False testimony could destroy a family’s inheritance in the land just allocated by lot (Joshua 13–21). 3. Recent experience of oppression. Israel had suffered state-sponsored slander in Egypt (Exodus 5:8 ff.). The command pushes the redeemed people to build a just society in contrast to Pharaoh’s system. Comparative Near-Eastern Law Cuneiform law codes unearthed at Susa, Nuzi, and Hattusa show that perjury was already a capital or corporal offense: • Code of Hammurabi §3—death for false accusation in a capital case. • Hittite Law §1—liability of the false accuser to the intended penalty of the victim. Yet Israel’s law is unique in grounding truth telling in God’s own character (Numbers 23:19) and tying every breach to covenant loyalty, not merely civil order. Legal Mechanisms Against Perjury Deuteronomy 19:16-21 prescribes lex talionis against the false witness: the liar receives the punishment he schemed for his neighbor. This safeguard, unrivaled in other ANE codes, both deters perjury and stresses proportional justice. The requirement of “two or three witnesses” (Deuteronomy 19:15) anticipates later rabbinic jurisprudence and New Testament ecclesiology (Matthew 18:16; 2 Corinthians 13:1). Archaeological And Manuscript Support • 4QDeut n, 4Q41 (Dead Sea Scrolls, 3rd–2nd c. BC) contain the verse with verbatim agreement to the medieval Masoretic Text, demonstrating textual stability over a millennium. • Iron-Age gate complexes at Dan, Beersheba, and Lachish display benches and coves used for local courts, matching Deuteronomy’s “gates” language. • Samaria Ostraca (8th c. BC) and Arad Letters (7th c. BC) show commerce recorded by witnesses, confirming the societal expectation of truthful attestation. Theological Motif Of Truth Yahweh is called “the God of truth” (Isaiah 65:16). To lie in court is, therefore, to rebel not only against a neighbor but against the covenant Lord (Leviticus 19:12). The command undergirds prophetic denunciations of societal collapse in later centuries (Isaiah 59:14-15; Jeremiah 9:3-6). Christological Fulfillment At Jesus’ trial, “many bore false witness against Him, but their testimony was inconsistent” (Mark 14:56), underscoring the sin this command condemns and setting the stage for the ultimate vindication in the resurrection (Acts 2:32). Christ calls His followers to an integrity that lets “Yes” be “Yes” (Matthew 5:37). Summary Deuteronomy 5:20 arises from Israel’s recent slavery, its oral legal system, covenant treaty form, and the broader ancient Near-Eastern milieu. Archaeology, manuscript evidence, and societal studies verify the historical plausibility of its setting, while Scripture presents the command as a reflection of God’s truthful character binding His redeemed people to protect life, liberty, and inheritance through honest testimony. |
    |