What historical context supports the message of Psalm 22:28? Canonical Text “For dominion belongs to the LORD, and He rules over the nations.” (Psalm 22:28) Authorship and Date Psalm 22 carries the superscription “For the choirmaster. To the tune of ‘The Doe of the Dawn.’ A Psalm of David.” Internal language, theological vocabulary, and ancient manuscript headings converge to place composition c. 1010–970 BC, within David’s reign or the fugitive years just prior. This was the formative era of Israel’s united monarchy, bracketed by regional powers such as Egypt’s waning New Kingdom influence and a rising Philistine coastal confederation. Immediate Literary Context Verses 1–21 portray a righteous sufferer abandoned by men yet ultimately rescued by God—imagery that prophetically foreshadows crucifixion events (vv. 16–18; cf. John 19:24, 37). Verses 22–31 transition from lament to universal praise, climaxing in v. 28. The psalm moves from personal affliction to cosmic proclamation: Yahweh not only saves the individual but reigns over “all the families of the nations” (v. 27). Historical Setting in David’s Life 1 Samuel 19–30 recounts David’s wilderness years, hunted by Saul. Forced among Philistines (1 Samuel 27) and confronting the Amalekite raid on Ziklag (1 Samuel 30), David witnessed geopolitical chaos. Psalm 22’s assertion that “dominion belongs to the LORD” counters apparent evidence that pagan strongmen held the reins. The psalm reassures Israel that covenantal promises (2 Samuel 7:13–16) remain unshaken—God, not circumstance, rules history. Ancient Near Eastern Kingship Claims Neighboring cultures portrayed national deities with local jurisdiction (e.g., the Moabite Mesha Stele: “Kemosh gave Moab victory”). In contrast, Psalm 22:28 declares Yahweh’s worldwide sovereignty. This counters the polytheistic norm, aligning with Exodus 15:18 and Deuteronomy 32:8–9. Israel’s God is not territorially bound; His “dominion” (מְלוּכָה, melukhah) is absolute. Theological Background in Israel’s Story The covenant at Sinai installed Yahweh as king (Exodus 19:5–6). The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) underscores His uniqueness. Israel’s liturgical calendar reinforced this: the enthronement psalms (Psalm 93–99) may have been sung at the autumn festival when the ark ascended Mount Zion, dramatizing God’s reign. Psalm 22’s closing section likely functioned similarly, reaffirming divine kingship in corporate worship. Foreshadowing and Messianic Fulfillment New Testament writers cite Psalm 22 nine times. Hebrews 2:12 quotes v. 22 in reference to the risen Christ. The universal rule stated in v. 28 blossoms in Philippians 2:9–11, where “every tongue” confesses Jesus as Lord. The resurrection vindicates Yahweh’s dominion pledge; the global mission of the church (Matthew 28:18–20) is the historical outworking of Psalm 22:28. Archaeological Corroboration of Davidic and Yahwistic Realities • Tel Dan Inscription (9th cent. BC) references the “House of David,” anchoring David in extra-biblical history. • Khirbet Qeiyafa ostracon (c. 1000 BC) reflects early Judahite administration under a centralized authority consistent with Davidic governance. • Kuntillet Ajrud inscriptions (c. 800 BC) invoke “YHWH of Teman,” showing Yahweh venerated beyond Canaan proper, implicitly supporting trans-regional lordship. These finds refute claims that David or Yahweh were late literary inventions and situate Psalm 22:28 in factual soil. Geopolitical Expansion and the Promise to the Nations From Genesis 12:3 onward, blessing to “all families of the earth” is covenantal core. David’s psalm reaffirms this trajectory. The later prophets echo it (Isaiah 2:2–4; Zechariah 14:9). Historically, Solomon’s reign saw foreign dignitaries—typified by the Queen of Sheba—acknowledging Yahweh’s wisdom (1 Kings 10). Post-exilic Jews spread monotheism through the Diaspora; the gospel then leapt linguistic and cultural borders within a generation, documented by Acts. The unbroken expansion corroborates Psalm 22:28’s foresight. Philosophical and Behavioral Implications If divine dominion is objective history, allegiance is not merely religious preference but moral necessity. Behavioral science recognizes that worldview shapes conduct; acknowledging Yahweh’s kingship provides transcendent grounding for ethics, hope amid suffering (vv. 1–21), and impetus for evangelism (vv. 30–31). Summary Psalm 22:28 arose from David’s lived tension between hostile circumstances and covenant confidence. Textual fidelity, archaeological data, and unfolding redemptive history all validate its assertion: Yahweh’s rule is not confined to Israel but encompasses every nation. The verse bridges David’s era, the crucifixion-resurrection event, and the global church age, testifying that “dominion belongs to the LORD, and He rules over the nations.” |
    |