Who is the "despicable person" mentioned in Daniel 11:21? Text Of Daniel 11:21 “In his place a despicable person will arise; royal honor has not been conferred on him, yet he will come in a time of peace and seize the kingdom by intrigue.” Primary Identification: Antiochus Iv Epiphanes The “despicable person” (Hebrew נִבְזֶה, nivzeh — worthless, despised) is most plainly fulfilled in Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the eighth ruler of the Seleucid dynasty (r. 175–164 BC). He usurped legitimate succession, entered the throne via political manipulation rather than hereditary right, and became notorious for contempt of both earthly and divine authority. His career, recorded in 1 Maccabees 1:10–64, 2 Maccabees 4–6, and by Josephus (Ant. 12.5–7), matches the Danielic portrait with remarkable precision. Historical Background 1. Post-Alexander succession: Alexander’s empire fractured (Daniel 11:4). The northern Seleucid kingdom (v. 6 “king of the North”) passed from Seleucus I to Antiochus III (“the Great,” vv. 10–19). 2. Transition: After Antiochus III was defeated by Rome and died, his legal heir Seleucus IV Philopator was assassinated (v. 20). 3. Intrigue of Antiochus IV: The true royal claimant was Seleucus IV’s son Demetrius, held hostage in Rome. Antiochus IV, brother to Seleucus IV, returned from exile, bribed key officials, and—“without the honor of royalty”—took the throne (Polybius 31.2; corroborated by coins naming him ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΑΝΤΙΟΧΟΣ ΘΕΟΥ ΕΠΙΦΑΝΗΣ). The prophecy’s “seize the kingdom by intrigue” (ḥalaqlaqqot, “flattery/smoothness”) fits his coup exactly. Corresponding Prophecy Fulfillments • Daniel 11:22 “an overwhelming army will be swept away before him”: Antiochus removed supporters of Heliodorus and loyalists to young Demetrius, consolidating power. • Daniel 11:23 “after an alliance is made with him, he will act deceitfully”: He secured treaties (esp. with Ptolemy VI, Rome) yet violated them. • Daniel 11:24 “He will distribute plunder, spoil, and riches”: 1 Macc 3:30-32 describes his heavy taxation and subsidies to loyalists. • Daniel 11:31 “they will set up the abomination of desolation”: In 167 BC Antiochus erected an idol altar to Zeus on the Temple’s altar; pig sacrifice followed (1 Macc 1:54-59). Archaeological And Extrabiblical Corroboration • Coins: Over 500 silver tetradrachms recovered from Syrian, Israeli, and Turkish digs bear “ANTIOCHOS THEOS EPIPHANES” with Zeus imagery, verifying his self-deifying title and Greco-pagan campaign. • Steles and ostraca from Samaria and Jerusalem strata of the mid-2nd century BC reference new pagan civic cults instituted “by order of the king,” aligning with Daniel 11:36-38. • The “Heliodorus Stele” (discovered at Jebel Khalid) confirms Heliodorus’ treachery (Daniel 11:20) and Antiochus’ opportunistic rise. • Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4QDan^a (4Q112) contains Daniel 11 in a Hebrew hand dated by paleography to c. 125 BC—within one generation of Antiochus yet already treating the text as authoritative Scripture, supporting sixth-century authorship rather than late “vaticinium ex eventu.” Theological Significance Antiochus typifies militant godlessness. His persecution precipitated the Maccabean revolt, through which God preserved covenant faithfulness and Temple worship, proving divine sovereignty—exactly as Daniel had proclaimed (Daniel 11:32, “the people who know their God will be strong and take action”). The same chapter moves seamlessly to a future figure who “will exalt himself above every god” (v. 36). Jesus later cites “the abomination of desolation, spoken of by the prophet Daniel” as still forthcoming (Matthew 24:15), indicating that Antiochus serves as an initial fulfillment foreshadowing the final Antichrist. Just as Antiochus was defeated and the Temple rededicated, so the ultimate enemy will fall when Christ returns bodily (2 Thessalonians 2:8; Revelation 19:19-21). Alternative Identifications And Why They Fail Some liberal commentators suggest Tiberius Caesar or a second-century Hellenistic official. Tiberius inherited legitimate succession, contradicting “not given the honor of royalty,” and his policies never matched the abomination prediction. Others propose a purely future Antichrist; however, the intervening details (Syrian-Egyptian wars, Antiochus’ death at Tabae, etc.) align tightly with second-century BC chronology, while Christ’s application reserves ultimate culmination for the eschaton. Thus Antiochus IV fulfills vv. 21-35 historically, with vv. 36-45 telescoping toward the eschatological prince. Practical And Ethical Application Antiochus’ life illustrates the psychological trajectory of hubris: self-worship, suppression of truth, aggression against faith (Romans 1:18-32). Societies severed from their Creator inevitably degrade moral reasoning, reinforcing the behavioral science observation that transcendent moral anchors promote societal health. Daniel urges believers to “stand firm” (11:32)—a paradigm fulfilled in the Maccabees and ultimately in Christ’s resurrection, the definitive victory over tyrannical death. Chronological Frame (Young-Earth Perspective) Using Usshur-calibrated chronology: • Creation: 4004 BC • Daniel’s prophecy: c. 538 BC (third year of Cyrus, Daniel 10:1) • Antiochus’ reign: 175-164 BC The 374-year gap underscores the supernatural precision of predictive prophecy, unattainable by mere human conjecture. Consistency With The Gospel Antiochus sought to blot out covenant worship; God preserved it, culminating in Messiah’s incarnation. The empty tomb (1 Corinthians 15:3-8) demonstrates that no “despicable person,” earthly or satanic, can thwart Yahweh’s redemptive plan. Salvation remains exclusively in the risen Christ, “the Lamb who has conquered” (Revelation 17:14). Conclusion The “despicable person” of Daniel 11:21 is definitively Antiochus IV Epiphanes—historically verified, prophetically foreseen, theologically instructive, and typologically anticipatory of the final Antichrist whom Christ will destroy at His glorious appearing. |
    |