Why are names in 1 Chronicles 3:20 important?
What is the significance of the names listed in 1 Chronicles 3:20?

Text And Immediate Context

1 Chronicles 3:19–20 : “The sons of Zerubbabel: Meshullam and Hananiah; Shelomith was their sister, and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah, and Jushab-hesed—five.”

The Chronicler places these six sons (Meshullam, Hananiah, Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah, Jushab-hesed) and one daughter (Shelomith) within the post-exilic record of David’s royal line. Verse 20 names the last five of Zerubbabel’s sons; they are the focus of this entry.


Historical Setting: Preserving The Davidic Line After The Exile

Zerubbabel, grandson of King Jehoiachin (1 Chronicles 3:17), led the first return from Babylon (Ezra 2; Haggai 1–2) and laid the foundation of the second temple around 536 BC. By recording Zerubbabel’s children, the Chronicler demonstrates that the kingly line survived exile intact—an essential prerequisite for the promised Messiah (2 Samuel 7:12–16; Jeremiah 23:5–6). Cuneiform ration tablets from Nebuchadnezzar’s court (published by E. F. Weidner, 1939) list “Ya’ukinu, king of Judah” and “his five sons,” confirming Jehoiachin’s family’s continued prominence in Babylon and harmonizing with Chronicles’ assertion of an unbroken genealogy.


Theological Weight Of Post-Exilic Names

The names in verse 20 collectively announce God’s covenant faithfulness after judgment. Each contains a root that proclaims either Yahweh’s gracious action or the community’s hopeful response. They form a miniature psalm of restoration within the genealogy.


Name-By-Name Analysis

1. Hashubah (חֲשֻׁבָה, “Esteemed” or “Accounted”)

• Root חשב, “to reckon.” God has “reckoned” His people righteous once more (cf. Zechariah 3:4).

• Echoes Isaiah 43:4 “Because you are precious (נִכְבַּדְתָּ) in My sight.”

2. Ohel (אֹהֶל, “Tent”)

• Reminds post-exilic readers of the wilderness tabernacle—God dwelling among His people (Exodus 25:8).

• Anticipates the second temple, yet its very meaning looks forward to the ultimate “tent” of God with humanity in Christ (John 1:14, Gk. ἐσκήνωσεν, “tabernacled”).

3. Berechiah (בֶּרֶכְיָה, “Yahweh Blesses”)

• Combines ברך “bless” + יה “Yah.”

• Appears elsewhere (e.g., the prophet Zechariah’s father, Zechariah 1:1), signaling prophetic blessing over temple rebuilding.

• Ostraca from Lachish (c. 588 BC) include theophoric names ending in –יה, establishing the usage of such covenantal formulations.

4. Hasadiah (חֲסַדְיָה, “Yahweh Has Shown Kindness/Mercy”)

• Root חסד, the steadfast covenant love celebrated in Psalm 136.

• Encapsulates Jeremiah’s promise of a “new covenant” of forgiveness (Jeremiah 31:31–34).

5. Jushab-hesed (יוּשַׁב־חֶסֶד, “Kindness Is Returned” or “He Who Dwells in Kindness”)

• From ישב “return/dwell” + חסד “lovingkindness.”

• The name itself is a doxology: exile ended, kindness restored.

• Septuagint renders as Ἰωσαβησέδ, attesting textual stability across traditions.


Literary And Chiastic Observations

The sequence frames two mercy-laden names (Berechiah, Hasadiah, Jushab-hesed) with two “structural” names (Hashubah, Ohel), forming an inclusio of grace around God’s restored dwelling. This subtle artistry underscores that restored blessing (names 3-5) is “housed” (names 1–2) within God’s renewed relationship.


Numeric Significance Of “Five”

Five often signals grace in Scripture (e.g., five sacrifices of Leviticus 1–5; five loaves feeding 5,000). The Chronicler’s explicit “—five” after listing the names highlights the motif: post-exilic Israel stands under divine grace, not mere survival.


Archaeological And Extra-Biblical Corroboration

• Babylonian ration tablets (Ebabbar archive) document Jehoiachin’s sons, making it historically plausible for his grandson Zerubbabel to sire the next Davidic generation in Jerusalem.

• A Persian-period seal reading “Belonging to Berekyahu, servant of the king” (published by Nahman Avigad, 1972) matches both name pattern and era.

• Y. Shiloh’s City of David excavations revealed administrative bullae bearing Yahwistic names identical in morphology to those in 1 Chronicles 3, demonstrating the normalcy of such theophoric constructions post-exile.


Messianic And Eschatological Trajectory

Matthew 1 traces Jesus’ legal lineage through Zerubbabel, while Luke 3 offers the biological line—together affirming that the promise of 2 Samuel 7 streams through 1 Chronicles 3. Thus the five names are more than antiquarian data; they are links in the chain leading to the Resurrection, the cornerstone of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3–4).


Application For Faith And Worship

Believers today can read these names as a testimonial that God remembers, dwells with, blesses, shows steadfast love, and restores kindness. Each trait finds ultimate expression in Christ (John 1:14, 16–17).


Evangelistic Implications

The precise preservation of otherwise obscure descendants across centuries, verified by independent records, offers a measurable, falsifiable claim: Scripture records verifiable history. If God keeps track of Hashubah and Jushab-hesed, He likewise notices every seeker (Luke 12:7) and offers the same steadfast love through the risen Messiah.


Summary

The names Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah, and Jushab-hesed are a post-exilic mini-creed: God has esteemed His people, pitched His tent among them, blessed them, shown covenant mercy, and returned His lovingkindness. Their placement in 1 Chronicles 3 safeguards the royal line’s continuity, substantiates the historical reliability of Scripture, and points unerringly to Jesus Christ—the ultimate Son of David and living fulfillment of every promise embedded in these five names.

How can we apply the importance of heritage and legacy in our Christian walk?
Top of Page
Top of Page