Why are the poor suffering in Job 24:10?
What historical context explains the plight of the poor in Job 24:10?

Text of Job 24:10

“Without clothing, they wander about naked. They carry the sheaves, but still go hungry.”


Chronological Placement of Job

Internal clues (Job 1:3; 42:16; the absence of the Mosaic priesthood; the use of the divine name Shaddai 31×) place Job in the patriarchal age (c. 2100–1800 BC). This situates the book centuries before the Exodus, in a culture that was clan-based, pastoral–agrarian, and governed by customary rather than codified Mosaic law.


Geography and Economy of Uz

Uz lay east or southeast of Canaan, adjacent to Edom (Lamentations 4:21) and Midian. Archaeological surveys around the Wadi Sirhan and the fringes of northern Arabia show fortified settlements and ample winter pastureland stretching back to the Early Bronze period—compatible with Job’s mixed livestock–crop economy (Job 1:3; 42:12). Grain, olives, and dates were staple commodities, and seasonal harvests required large pools of day-laborers.


Agrarian Labor Practices

Harvesting grain involved binding reaped stalks into sheaves, which were then carted to a communal threshing floor. Day-laborers (Heb. sāḵîr) were paid daily (cf. Leviticus 19:13). In lean times a poor man borrowed seed or tools, pledging his outer cloak as collateral. Failure to pay by harvest meant the creditor could keep the cloak (Exodus 22:26–27) and claim a share of the harvested sheaves.


Garments as Collateral

Sheep-wool mantles were essential for warmth at night. Several Mari letters (18ᵗʰ c. BC) and Nuzi tablets (15ᵗʰ c. BC) record outer garments pledged for seed grain, exactly mirroring Job 24:7–10. The Code of Hammurabi §117 forbids seizing a debtor’s cloak permanently—an ethical concern echoed later in Deuteronomy 24:12–13. When Job laments “they wander about naked,” he describes creditors who hold the cloak beyond sunset, violating even pagan Near-Eastern norms.


“Carrying the Sheaves, Yet Hungry”

The laborer often carried the owner’s grain to the threshing floor before receiving his wage. A crooked landowner delayed payment, forcing the worker to handle abundance he could not eat. Contemporary cuneiform contracts from Alalakh specify a ration of “1 qa of grain per day” for harvesters; withholding this stipend constituted theft. Job charges the wicked with such oppression.


Comparative Legal Witness

• Code of Hammurabi §148–§152 require vineyard owners to feed vinedressers.

• Middle Assyrian Laws A §50 threatens flogging for anyone depriving a poor hireling of his wage.

Job’s complaint assumes universal moral law rooted in the character of Yahweh, predating Sinai yet consistent with it—evidence that the Pentateuchal ethics are not late inventions but reflections of longstanding divine standards.


Archaeological Corroboration

1. Tell el-Daba sickle-blades with silica sheen demonstrate intensive cereal harvesting in 2ᵑᵈ-millennium Canaan, matching Job’s era.

2. A 19ᵗʰ-century BC cylinder seal from Sippar shows bent laborers carrying sheaves under an overseer—visual confirmation of the practice Job describes.

3. Ostraca from Khirbet Qeiyafa (c. 1000 BC) include the phrase “do not oppress the slave and the widow,” echoing Job’s moral protest and indicating continuity of concern for the poor across centuries.


Theological Trajectory

Job exposes systemic injustice, anticipating the Law’s commands (Leviticus 19:9–10; Deuteronomy 24:14-15) and the Prophets’ rebukes (Amos 2:6-7). Christ fulfills this ethic: “For I was hungry and you gave Me food” (Matthew 25:35). The risen Redeemer (Job 19:25) guarantees final reversal—an eschatological hope validated by the historical resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), attested by over five hundred eyewitnesses whose testimony remains uncontested in first-century sources (1 Corinthians 15:6; Tacitus, Annals 15.44).


Practical Application

Believers are commanded to rectify injustices Job decries—paying fair wages (James 5:4), returning collateral (Proverbs 3:27-28), and sharing harvest abundance (2 Corinthians 9:8-10). To ignore the plight of the working poor is to side with the oppressors Job condemns.


Summary

Job 24:10 portrays day-laborers in patriarchal Uz whose garments have been seized and whose promised grain is withheld. Contemporary legal texts, archaeological artifacts, and later biblical legislation validate this picture. The verse functions as both historical window and moral indictment, pointing forward to the ultimate justice secured by the risen Christ.

How does Job 24:10 challenge the belief in a just and fair God?
Top of Page
Top of Page