Why were two goats chosen for the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16:7? Text in View “Then he is to take the two goats and present them before the LORD at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting” (Leviticus 16:7). One Day, Two Goats, One Atonement Leviticus 16 centers on a single annual rite—Yom Kippur—designed to cleanse both sanctuary and people from every sin accumulated through the year. Yet God commanded two goats, not one, in order to portray two complementary aspects of atonement that a single animal could not exhibit simultaneously: (1) propitiation by sacrificial blood and (2) expiation by removal of guilt. Ritual Sequence 1. Two male goats of equal value were set before the LORD. 2. Lots were cast—one “for the LORD,” the other “for Azazel” (16:8). 3. The first goat was slain; its blood was sprinkled inside the veil on the mercy seat, satisfying divine justice (16:15–16). 4. The high priest then laid both hands on the live goat, confessing all Israel’s sins, transferring corporate guilt. The goat was led into the wilderness, bearing those sins away (16:20–22). Propitiation: Blood That Satisfies “The life of a creature is in its blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for your souls” (Leviticus 17:11). The slain goat demonstrated that sin demands death; a substitute died so the covenant people might live. Hebrews applies this directly to Christ: “He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, not by the blood of goats and calves but by His own blood, thus securing eternal redemption” (Hebrews 9:12). Expiation: Guilt Removed and Forgotten The live goat enacted Psalm 103:12 before it was written: “As far as the east is from the west, so far has He removed our transgressions from us” . Visibly carrying sin “to a remote place” (16:22) dramatized the complete, irreversible removal of guilt. Isaiah later declares of Messiah, “He has borne our griefs” (Isaiah 53:4–6). Why Two, Not One? 1. Simultaneous symbolism: Death and removal cannot be enacted by the same animal at the same moment. 2. Complete picture: God’s forgiveness is both judicial (wrath satisfied) and relational (guilt gone). 3. Pedagogical clarity: Yearly repetition seared these twin truths into national memory until the true High Priest arrived. 4. Divine selection: By lots, God—not human preference—assigned each role, underscoring sovereign grace (Proverbs 16:33). Historical and Archaeological Corroboration • Qumran’s Temple Scroll (11Q19) preserves the Yom Kippur order almost verbatim, showing continuity from Sinai to Second Temple Judaism. • Josephus records the same two-goat liturgy in 1st-century Jerusalem (Antiquities 3.10.3), supporting the text’s historicity. • Excavations on the Temple Mount have unearthed stone weights matching Mishnah descriptions of the scarlet thread tied to the scapegoat—an external witness to Leviticus’ accuracy. Typological Fulfillment in Christ The New Testament compresses the twin-goat imagery into one Person: • As the slain goat, Christ’s blood satisfies wrath (Romans 3:25). • As the scapegoat, He bears sin outside the camp (Hebrews 13:12). Resurrection verifies both: the empty tomb proves sacrifice accepted and sin truly removed (Romans 4:25). Pastoral and Behavioral Implications 1. Assurance: Believers need not relive guilt already carried away by Christ. 2. Worship: Propitiation evokes gratitude; expiation ignites joy. 3. Evangelism: Tangible, historical rituals present sin’s seriousness and God’s remedy—indispensable in a culture desensitized to guilt. Answer in Brief Two goats were chosen so that one could die to satisfy God’s justice while the other could visibly transport sin into oblivion, together portraying the full spectrum of atonement ultimately fulfilled in the crucified and risen Christ. |
    |