Why did David build an altar in 1 Chronicles 21:26? Canonical Context 1 Chronicles is the post-exilic historian’s Spirit-guided retelling of Israel’s monarchy, highlighting God’s covenant faithfulness and David’s role in preparing for the temple. Unlike 2 Samuel 24, which recounts the same episode for the earlier audience, the Chronicler writes for returned exiles who need reassurance that worship at the divinely chosen site would restore blessing. Within this purpose the text states: “And David built there an altar to the LORD and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. He called on the LORD, and He answered him with fire from heaven on the altar of burnt offering” (1 Chronicles 21:26). Historical Background: David’s Census and Plague Around 970 BC, near the end of David’s reign, the king ordered a census that sprang from prideful reliance on military strength (1 Chronicles 21:1–8). God allowed Satan’s incitement but remained sovereign, sending the prophet Gad to announce judgment: three options—famine, enemy pursuit, or plague (vv. 11-13). David chose to fall into Yahweh’s merciful hands. Seventy thousand died before “the Angel of the LORD” halted at the threshing floor of Ornan (Araunah) the Jebusite (vv. 14-15). Gad then commanded David, “Go up and build an altar to the LORD on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite” (v. 18). The Divine Command to Build an Altar The altar was not David’s private idea; it was God’s specific remedy to end the plague. Old-covenant sacrifice provided substitutionary atonement: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood… it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life” (Leviticus 17:11). Only a divinely sanctioned altar could host such an offering (Deuteronomy 12:5-14). Thus the command moves from judgment to grace, highlighting Yahweh’s unchanging method—blood sacrifice—to reconcile sinners to Himself. Location: The Threshing Floor of Ornan the Jebusite (Mount Moriah) Threshing floors sat on high, windy bedrock, ideal for winnowing. Ornan’s floor lies on the summit of Mount Moriah, just north of the City of David. Genesis links this ridge to Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac: “Go to the land of Moriah… on one of the mountains I will show you” (Genesis 22:2). Centuries later Solomon would build the temple on “Mount Moriah, where the LORD had appeared to David his father, the place David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan” (2 Chronicles 3:1). Modern archaeological cores beneath the Temple Mount reveal a flat bedrock—consistent with an ancient threshing floor—confirming the plausibility of the biblical locale. Purpose 1: Atonement Through Sacrifice David’s offerings were twofold. The burnt offering (ʿōlāh) symbolized total consecration; every part ascended in smoke (Leviticus 1). The peace offering (šelem) expressed restored fellowship with God and often included communal meals (Leviticus 3). Together they addressed both sin’s guilt and the relational rupture. God’s fiery answer (1 Chronicles 21:26) mirrored earlier divine approvals: Moses and Aaron (Leviticus 9:24) and later Solomon (2 Chronicles 7:1). The supernatural fire signified God’s acceptance; consequently “the LORD spoke to the angel, who put his sword back into its sheath” (1 Chronicles 21:27). Purpose 2: Public Repentance and Leadership Responsibility Kings influence nations. David’s census sin was corporate; therefore his atoning act had to be public. He refused Ornan’s generous offer of free land and animals, declaring, “I will not take for the LORD what is yours, nor offer burnt offerings that cost me nothing” (1 Chronicles 21:24). Genuine repentance bears cost, demonstrating that forgiveness, though gracious, is never cheap. This principle anticipates the ultimate cost of our redemption—“you were bought at a price” (1 Corinthians 6:20). Purpose 3: Establishing the Future Temple Site The altar fixes the geographic center of Israel’s worship. Immediately after the plague stops, David proclaims, “This is the house of the LORD God, and this is the altar of burnt offering for Israel” (1 Chronicles 22:1). Thus the sacrifice initiates preparation for the temple, securing materials, liturgy, and priestly divisions (chs. 22–28). The Chronicler’s exilic readers, already rebuilding a second temple on that spot, would find vindication for their location and worship. Purpose 4: Demonstrating Obedient Faith Over Human Strength The census revealed David’s misplaced trust in numbers; the altar corrected it. By obeying God’s word through Gad, David showed that victory and safety stem from divine favor, not human statistics (Psalm 20:7). The altar becomes faith’s monument—what God values is contrite obedience (Psalm 51:17), the very heart that prompted David to purchase the threshing floor at full value. Purpose 5: Typological Foreshadowing of Christ’s Ultimate Sacrifice Mount Moriah already prefigured substitutionary atonement when a ram replaced Isaac (Genesis 22:13-14). David’s altar layers the typology: wrath halted, sacrifice offered, fire confirming acceptance. Centuries later, a short walk west of the temple mount, Jesus would be crucified. The writer to the Hebrews links the shadows to the reality: “But this Man, after offering one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God” (Hebrews 10:12). As David’s altar ended a temporal plague, Christ’s cross ends sin’s eternal plague for those who believe. Purpose 6: Covenant Continuity and the Davidic Throne Stopping the plague preserved the nation from potential annihilation, ensuring God’s promise of an eternal dynasty (2 Samuel 7:12-16). Scripture consistently ties royal legitimacy to covenant obedience and proper worship. By building the altar, David aligned throne and temple, king and Priest-King—anticipating Messiah, the Son of David, who unites both offices perfectly (Psalm 110; Zechariah 6:13). Archaeological and Geographic Corroboration • Tel Dan Inscription (9th cent. BC) confirms a historical “House of David.” • Bullae from the City of David bearing names of royal officials (e.g., Gemaryahu) situate a functioning bureaucracy in the 10th–9th centuries. • The bedrock beneath the Dome of the Rock exhibits chisel marks consistent with ancient threshing floors and later quarrying for Solomon’s foundation stones. • Eilat Mazar’s excavations of Large-Stone Structures south of the Temple Mount support an Iron Age royal quarter—fitting David-Solomon chronology. Such finds situate David as a real monarch and the temple site as the same elevated platform prescribed by the Chronicler. Comparative Chronology and Young-Earth Considerations Using Ussher-style chronology, creation occurred ~4004 BC, the Flood ~2348 BC, Abraham ~1996 BC, and David’s altar ~970 BC, easily within the biblical framework. Geological studies of the Judean Ridge reveal rapidly deposited sedimentary layers lacking long gaps, consistent with Flood-era cataclysmic deposition rather than slow uniformitarian processes. These observations align with the biblical timeline that undergirds David’s historical setting. Practical and Devotional Implications 1. Sin’s consequences are real and communal; repentance must be public when our actions wound others. 2. Genuine worship costs something; cheap religion insults the cross. 3. God sovereignly turns judgment into blessing when we obediently respond to His revealed word. 4. Our confidence rests not in numbers, resources, or strategies, but in God’s mercy secured through sacrifice. 5. Every altar, every lamb, every ember pointing upward foreshadows Christ, the once-for-all offering. Conclusion David built the altar in 1 Chronicles 21:26 because God commanded it as the divinely appointed means to halt judgment, demonstrate atonement, model repentant leadership, establish the future temple site, and foreshadow the saving work of Messiah. The historical, textual, archaeological, and theological evidence converges to show that this single act of obedience was a pivotal moment in redemptive history—a moment that still echoes in every heart that finds refuge at the greater altar of the cross. |
    |