Why did Elkanah go to Shiloh annually to worship and sacrifice to the LORD of Hosts? Historical Setting: Shiloh as the Central Sanctuary After the conquest, “the whole congregation of the Israelites assembled at Shiloh and set up the Tent of Meeting there” (Joshua 18:1). Shiloh was thus the divinely chosen location for Israel’s national worship between the conquest and the move of the ark to Jerusalem (ca. 1400–1000 BC on a conservative timeline). Excavations at Tel Shiloh have uncovered massive pottery dumps, collar–rim jars, cultic installations, and a probable platform matching Tabernacle dimensions, all indicating prolonged, large-scale sacrificial activity consistent with the biblical record. Mosaic Command for Annual Pilgrimage Three pilgrimage feasts required every covenant male to appear before Yahweh: Unleavened Bread, Weeks, and Booths (Exodus 23:14-17; Deuteronomy 16:16). While the ark resided at Shiloh, those appearances were made there. Elkanah, a Levite-descended Ephraimite (1 Chronicles 6:33-38), obeyed this statute. His journeys were not optional devotions but covenant obligations binding upon every faithful Israelite household. Specific Sacrificial Duties Required of Elkanah Leviticus 1–7 outlines burnt, peace, sin, and grain offerings. Deuteronomy 12:5-7 requires that these be brought to “the place the LORD your God will choose.” Elkanah likely offered: • Burnt offering (ʿōlāh) expressing total devotion. • Peace offering (šĕlāmîm) shared as a communal meal—hence portions given to Peninnah, her children, and “a double portion” to Hannah (1 Samuel 1:5). • Tithes, firstfruits, and votive offerings connected to household vows (Deuteronomy 12:11). His compliance demonstrated covenant fidelity in an age otherwise marked by the moral chaos of the Judges (Judges 21:25). Family Devotion and Covenant Identity Elkanah brought his entire family, modeling Deuteronomy 6:6-9—teaching children “when you sit in your house and when you walk along the road.” By incorporating his wives and children in sacrificial fellowship meals, he reinforced their identity as Yahweh’s covenant people. The Title “LORD of Hosts” First appearing in historical narrative here, “Yahweh Ṣĕbāʾōt” emphasizes God’s universal sovereignty over angelic armies and earthly powers. Its use underscores that worship at Shiloh was not local pagan ritual but submission to the cosmic King. Timing and the Pilgrim Feasts “Year after year” (Hebrew miyammîm, “from days to days”) idiomatically points to the set annual festivals. The Septuagint adds “from days to days,” confirming a regular liturgical cycle. Whether Elkanah attended all three feasts or one representative feast each year, his pattern fulfilled Torah requirements. Personal Motives: Hannah’s Vow and Barrenness Hannah’s childlessness carried social stigma and was interpreted theologically (Genesis 30:1; Deuteronomy 7:14). The annual pilgrimage provided: 1. Access to priestly mediation (Numbers 6:22-27). 2. A setting for vows (“If You will look upon Your servant’s affliction … I will give him to the LORD all the days of his life,” 1 Samuel 1:11). Thus, while covenantal obedience was primary, Hannah’s desperation added poignancy to each journey. Priestly Mediation at Shiloh Hophni and Phinehas, though corrupt, still officiated (1 Samuel 2:12-17). Mosaic law locates atonement in the sacrifice itself (Leviticus 17:11); therefore, the efficacy of worship did not rest on priestly character but on God’s ordained means, prefiguring the ultimate Priest, Christ (Hebrews 7:23-28). Typological Foreshadowing of Christ Samuel’s conception, dedication, and prophetic ministry anticipate the greater Prophet-Priest-King (Deuteronomy 18:15; Luke 2:40, 52). Elkanah’s annual trek sets the stage for Samuel’s birth narrative, which in turn foreshadows the Incarnation and the once-for-all sacrifice of Jesus, the true Tabernacle (John 1:14; Hebrews 9:11-12). Archaeological Corroboration of Shiloh’s Cultic Complex • Bone deposits dominated by right foreleg portions—matching the priestly share in Leviticus 7:32—have been cataloged. • A large, flat rectangular sector (c. 20 × 50 m) aligns with Tabernacle dimensions (Exodus 26). • Israeli archaeologist Dr. Scott Stripling reports storage rooms and smashed ceramic pithoi dated to Iron I, indicating mass-feed events compatible with pilgrimage feasts. These findings collectively affirm the biblical role of Shiloh. Practical Application Believers today do not travel to Shiloh but “draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith” (Hebrews 10:22). Consistent corporate worship, sacrificial generosity, and family discipleship remain vital responses to the God who still answers barren hearts and brings forth life. Summary Elkanah’s annual pilgrimage to Shiloh was driven by Mosaic command, centered on covenantal sacrifice, enriched by familial devotion, and orchestrated by God to usher in Samuel’s ministry and, ultimately, the Messiah’s redemptive work. |
    |