Why did Jehoiakim do evil in the sight of the LORD according to 2 Chronicles 36:5? 2 Chronicles 36:5 “Jehoiakim was twenty-five years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem eleven years. And he did evil in the sight of the LORD his God.” Historical Setting of Jehoiakim’s Reign Pharaoh Neco II of Egypt deposed Josiah’s son Jehoahaz and installed Eliakim, renaming him Jehoiakim (2 Kings 23:34). Judah thus entered a vassal relationship with Egypt, soon to be replaced by Babylon after Carchemish (605 BC). The pressure of shifting allegiances, tribute demands, and looming invasion formed the political backdrop for Jehoiakim’s moral choices. Canonical Portrait of Jehoiakim’s Evil • 2 Kings 23:36–24:4 recounts idolatry, oppressive taxation, and “innocent blood… which the LORD was not willing to forgive.” • Jeremiah 22:13-19 condemns his forced labor, greed, and palace-building (“Woe to him who builds his house by unrighteousness”). • Jeremiah 26:20-24 records his execution of Uriah the prophet. • Jeremiah 36:20-26 shows him slashing and burning Jeremiah’s scroll—even after three readings—an emblem of hard-hearted rebellion. • 2 Chronicles simply summarizes: “he did evil,” a formula the Chronicler uses whenever a king rejects covenant loyalty (cf. Deuteronomy 17:14-20). Immediate Biblical Explanation 1. Rejection of Covenant Law – He ignored Deuteronomy’s requirements for monarchs to read and obey God’s Torah. 2. Idolatry and Syncretism – Maintaining high places (2 Kings 23:37) reversed Josiah’s reforms. 3. Violent Injustice – Murder of prophets and shedding of innocent blood (Jeremiah 22:17). 4. Pride and Self-Reliance – Trust in Egypt/Babylon rather than Yahweh (Jeremiah 37:5-10), echoed in Isaiah’s earlier warnings (Isaiah 31:1). Theological Dynamics: Heart, Will, and Accountability Scripture ties evil actions to an unregenerate heart (Jeremiah 17:9). Jehoiakim’s persistent unbelief triggered divine “hardening” (cf. Exodus 9:12; Proverbs 29:1). Responsibility still rests on him: “You have eyes and heart only for your dishonest gain” (Jeremiah 22:17). Prophetic Witness and Rebuke Jeremiah prophesied throughout Jehoiakim’s reign. The king could have repented as Nineveh once did (Jonah 3), but instead attempted to silence the Word, illustrating Romans 1:18—“suppressing the truth in unrighteousness.” Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • Babylonian Chronicle (BM 21946) mentions Nebuchadnezzar’s 597 BC campaign and the capture of “the king of Judah,” confirming the Biblical sequence leading to Jehoiachin’s exile. • Cuneiform ration tablets (Ebabbar archive, 595-570 BC) list “Ya-u-kû-kînu, king of Ya-hudu,” validating the dynasty. • Lachish Ostraca (ca. 588 BC) reveal the prophetic milieu: officials worried “we are watching for the signals of Lachish… because we cannot see Azekah,” echoing Jeremiah 34:7. These artifacts show Chronicles functions as accurate history, not myth. Psychological and Behavioral Insight Rebellious leadership frequently crystallizes around three factors: (1) incentive—power and wealth (Jeremiah 22:13-15); (2) social modeling—return to pre-Josianic norms; (3) suppression of cognitive dissonance—burning the scroll removed the uncomfortable divine critique. Modern behavioral science identifies “moral disengagement” mechanisms that parallel Jehoiakim’s pattern. Covenantal Consequences Jehoiakim’s apostasy invited covenant curses (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28). Babylon’s siege and his shameful death (“the burial of a donkey,” Jeremiah 22:19) exemplified lex talionis justice. Christological Trajectory Jehoiakim’s failure highlights the need for a righteous Davidic King. The Chronicler’s closing verses point forward to the post-exilic hope fulfilled ultimately in Jesus the Messiah, “who committed no sin” (1 Peter 2:22). Practical Implications for Readers • Neglect of Scripture breeds moral blindness; regular engagement with God’s Word guards the heart (Psalm 119:11). • Leaders bear heightened accountability (Luke 12:48). • Repentance remains open until hearts are irreversibly hardened; today is “the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians 6:2). Summary Answer Jehoiakim did evil because he willfully rejected Yahweh’s covenant, embraced idolatry, oppressed his people, silenced prophetic correction, and trusted political alliances rather than God. 2 Chronicles 36:5 condenses this multifaceted rebellion into the standard verdict: “he did evil in the sight of the LORD.” |
    |