Why did Pharaoh repeatedly change his mind after promising to let the Israelites go in Exodus 8:28? Definition and Key Passage Pharaoh’s pattern of promising liberty and then retracting it climaxes in Exodus 8:28 : “Pharaoh said, ‘I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness, but you must not go very far. Pray for me.’ ” Yet when the plague ends, “Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and he did not let the people go” (v. 32). This entry explores why. Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility 1. The narrative alternates between “Pharaoh hardened his heart” (Exodus 8:15, 32) and “the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart” (Exodus 9:12; 10:20; 14:8). 2. Scripture consistently affirms both truths. Pharaoh acts freely and culpably, while God judicially confirms Pharaoh’s chosen obstinacy (cf. Romans 9:17–18). 3. The purpose is missional: “that My name may be proclaimed in all the earth” (Exodus 9:16). Egyptian Religious-Political Context Pharaoh was regarded as the living embodiment of Ra-Horakhty. Admitting Yahweh’s authority would publicly dethrone him and invalidate Egypt’s pantheon. Each plague attacked a specific deity (e.g., Hapi, Heqet, Khepri, Hathor, Nut, Ra), forcing Pharaoh into a contest of divine legitimacy. Capitulation would unravel the theological fabric of the state. Plague-by-Plague Escalation 1. Blood → economic blow to the Nile god. 2. Frogs → ridicule of frog-headed Heqet. 3. Gnats → priests rendered unclean. 4. Flies → royal land Goshen spared, showing discrimination. 5. Livestock → wealth destroyed. 6. Boils → magicians disabled. 7. Hail → sky deities humiliated. 8. Locusts → total agricultural ruin. 9. Darkness → Ra eclipsed. Pharaoh’s vacillation after each plague reflects crisis bargaining, not conversion. The Theology of Judicial Hardening Scripture elsewhere records God giving people over to their chosen rebellion (Isaiah 6:9–10; John 12:40). The Exodus event becomes the archetype. Judicial hardening magnifies grace to Israel while exposing the futility of self-exalting power structures. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration • Merneptah Stele (c. 1210 BC) attests to an ethnic group “Israel” already in Canaan. • Ipuwer Papyrus (2:10–13; 4:14–18) laments Nile blood, darkness, and social collapse—parallels to the plagues. • Beni Hasan tomb painting (c. 1890 BC) depicts Semitic shepherds entering Egypt, consonant with Genesis 46. • The Late-Bronze-Age wadi tumuli along the Sinai route align with a 15th-century BC exodus (cf. 1 Kings 6:1). Text-critical study shows the Exodus account stable across the Masoretic Text, Samaritan Pentateuch, and Dead Sea Scroll fragments (4QExod). The literary core is thus securely transmitted. Purpose in Redemptive History Pharaoh’s refusals (and God’s orchestration of them) create the stage for the Passover, prefiguring Christ, “our Passover lamb” (1 Corinthians 5:7). Salvation history turns on God delivering His people by blood, conquering tyranny, and forming a covenant community. Lessons for Faith and Life • Softening begins today (Hebrews 3:13). Habitual postponement calcifies unbelief. • God’s patience has limits; persistent rebellion may be met with divine ratification of hardness (Proverbs 29:1). • Deliverance is entirely of grace; Israel contributes nothing but helplessness—a foreshadowing of the gospel (Ephesians 2:8–9). Answer Summary Pharaoh repeatedly reversed his promises because (1) he freely loved power and idolatry, (2) God judicially solidified that choice to display His glory, (3) the cultural-political stakes were total, and (4) each reprieve removed the immediate fear while leaving the underlying rebellion untouched. The pattern exposes the deadly progression of sin and exalts the sovereign mercy that later culminates in the resurrection of Christ, the greater Exodus for all who believe. |
    |