Why did Reuben suggest not killing Joseph in Genesis 37:22? Canonical Text (Genesis 37:22) “‘Do not shed blood,’ Reuben continued. ‘Throw him into this pit in the wilderness, but do not lay a hand on him.’ Reuben said this in order to rescue Joseph from their hands and return him to his father.” Literary Flow and Context Genesis 37 opens Joseph’s story. Joseph’s brothers, fueled by envy of the “tunic of many colors” (37:3) and his prophetic dreams (37:5-11), conspire to kill him (37:18-20). Verse 22 records Reuben’s counterproposal. The narrator explicitly states Reuben’s intention, anchoring motive in the text itself: he planned to rescue Joseph later. This sets up the tension that ultimately leads to Joseph’s survival, enslavement, and eventual elevation in Egypt (Genesis 41). Firstborn Responsibility and Family Headship Reuben, as Jacob’s firstborn (Genesis 29:32), bore covenantal and social responsibility for the well-being of younger siblings (cf. Deuteronomy 21:17). Ancient Near Eastern law codes (e.g., Lipit-Ishtar §24) and the later Mosaic principle of the “eldest” as family representative support this dynamic. Reuben understood that if blood were shed, he would be regarded as chief culprit and liable for the avenger of blood (Numbers 35:19). Sparing Joseph protected both the brother and Reuben’s own standing. Moral and Legal Awareness of Murder Centuries before Sinai, Genesis 9:6 (the Noahic mandate) prohibited murder: “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed.” That universal directive, handed down through patriarchal tradition, informed Reuben’s conscience. His plea—“Do not shed blood”—echoes that command, showing that the moral law against murder preceded the Mosaic code. Desire to Restore Favor with Jacob Genesis 35:22 reveals Reuben’s earlier sin with Bilhah, Jacob’s concubine. That act forfeited his eventual birthright (Genesis 49:4). Rescuing Joseph offered a path toward regaining paternal trust. By bringing Joseph home alive, Reuben could mitigate the shame of his earlier transgression. Psychological Dynamics Among the Brothers Sibling rivalry, aggravated by Jacob’s overt favoritism, created a volatile environment (Genesis 37:4). Reuben’s proposal exploited a tactical compromise: it satisfied the brothers’ immediate anger (throw Joseph into a pit) while avoiding irreversible bloodshed. Social psychologists label such intervention “conflict-reframing,” lowering aggression without direct confrontation—consistent with behavioral science models of sibling conflict resolution. Providential Preservation of Redemptive History God’s plan to elevate Joseph, preserve Jacob’s family during famine, and prepare the stage for the Exodus (Genesis 45:7-8; 50:20) required Joseph’s life. Reuben’s intervention is one of several divinely orchestrated “links” ensuring the messianic promise remains intact. The narrative stresses that human free choices (Reuben’s warning, Judah’s later suggestion, the passing caravan) mesh with God’s sovereign design (Romans 8:28). Later Scriptural Confirmation of Reuben’s Motive Decades later, when the brothers stand before Joseph in Egypt, Reuben reminds them: “Did I not tell you, ‘Do not sin against the boy’? But you would not listen” (Genesis 42:22). This retrospection validates verse 22 and shows Reuben’s longstanding grief over the near-crime, reinforcing the sincerity of his original intent. Cultural and Archaeological Corroboration 1. Cisterns/Pits: Surveys at Dothan (Tell Dothan) and the Judean Hill Country expose Middle Bronze Age bottle-shaped cisterns, precisely matching the “pit in the wilderness” description. 2. Ishmaelite Trade: Mari Tablets (18th c. BC) list caravans transporting “gum, balm, myrrh,” identical to Genesis 37:25. Camel figures at Timna and petroglyphs in the Negev corroborate early camel-supported commerce, fitting Joseph’s era. 3. Blood-guilt Concepts: Nuzi tablets record family blood responsibility similar to Genesis 4:10 and 9:6, underscoring the legal backdrop Reuben recognized. Theological Implications • God’s providence works through flawed people; even a disgraced firstborn can serve divine purposes. • The sanctity of life is a constant biblical ethic, grounded in creation (Genesis 1:27) and reaffirmed through patriarchal narrative. • The incident typologically foreshadows Christ: like Joseph, Jesus is rejected by His brethren yet preserved for a greater deliverance (Acts 3:13-15). Practical and Pastoral Applications • Intervene against injustice even when doing so risks misunderstanding. • Past sin does not preclude present obedience; repentance expresses itself in concrete acts of protection. • Trust God’s larger plan when circumstances look dire; He often uses hidden advocates. Summary Reuben urged the brothers not to kill Joseph because—driven by firstborn duty, moral revulsion at bloodshed, personal desire for restoration, and an ultimately providential role—he aimed to save Joseph’s life. His intervention preserved the channel through which God would later bring physical salvation to Israel and, eventually, spiritual salvation to the world through Christ. |
    |