Why did Saul want to kill David according to 1 Samuel 20:31? Text of 1 Samuel 20:31 “For as long as the son of Jesse lives on the earth, neither you nor your kingdom will be established. Now send and bring him to me, for he must die!” Immediate Narrative Setting Saul, Israel’s first king, has just hurled his spear at Jonathan during a royal banquet (20:30,33). Jonathan had defended David’s absence, exposing the king’s simmering rage. Verse 31 records Saul’s explicit rationale: David’s continued life threatens Jonathan’s succession and Saul’s dynasty. Political Motivation: Preservation of the Throne 1. Dynastic Anxiety. In a tribal monarchy the heir’s legitimacy depended on the reigning king’s uncontested rule. Saul sees David—already celebrated as “Israel’s champion” (18:7)—as the popular alternative. 2. Statutory Precedent. Near-Eastern kings routinely eliminated rivals (cf. 2 Kings 10:6-7; Assyrian annals of Ashurbanipal). Saul’s words mirror that milieu: remove the rival, secure the line. 3. Jonathan’s Implied Rivalry. Because Jonathan had earlier relinquished his royal robe and armor to David (18:3-4), Saul interprets even filial loyalty as treason, deepening the urgency to kill David. Jealousy and Envy: Psychological Drivers From the moment women sang “Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands” (18:7), Saul’s esteem plummeted. Modern behavioral research on status threat shows elevated cortisol and aggression when a dominant individual loses public acclaim; Saul exhibits classic maladaptive envy—recurrent spear-throwing (18:11; 19:10) and assassination plots (19:1,11,15). Divine Rejection and the Knowledge of David’s Anointing 1. Prophetic Disclosure. Samuel had privately anointed David (16:13). Though not publicly proclaimed, Saul likely learned of it; Samuel had already told him, “The LORD has torn the kingdom … and given it to one better than you” (15:28). 2. Spiritual Abandonment. “The Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD tormented him” (16:14). Separation from divine favor compounded paranoia, making homicidal reasoning appear political prudence. Demonic Influence and Moral Degeneration The Hebrew “rûaḥ ra‘â” (evil spirit) denotes a real malevolent agency permitted for judgment. Repeated episodes of violent mania (18:10; 19:9) show progressive reprobation. Saul’s order to kill the priests of Nob (22:17-19) confirms a conscience seared beyond normal court intrigue. Covenant Theme: King Versus God’s Chosen Saul sets himself against YHWH’s elective purpose. Theologically, 20:31 crystallizes Deuteronomy’s warning that resisting God’s chosen mediator invites judgment (Deuteronomy 18:19). David—type of the Messiah—must suffer royal hostility before enthronement, foreshadowing Christ’s rejection (Luke 24:26-27). Archaeological and Textual Corroboration • Tel Dan Stele (9th c. B.C.) names the “House of David,” affirming a real Davidic dynasty Saul feared. • Khirbet Qeiyafa ostracon (late 11th / early 10th c. B.C.) reflects a centralized Hebrew polity compatible with the united monarchy setting. • 4Q51 (Dead Sea Scrolls Samuel a) preserves 1 Samuel with only minor orthographic variation; the hostile dialogue in 20:30-31 is ancient, not later editorial invention. Practical and Pastoral Implications 1. Guard the heart against envy—“envy rots the bones” (Proverbs 14:30). 2. Power sought apart from divine sanction breeds tyranny. 3. God’s sovereign plan cannot be thwarted; attempts to kill the anointed only advance His redemptive history. Summary Answer Saul sought to kill David because he perceived David’s continued life as a direct, existential threat to the establishment of his own dynasty and Jonathan’s kingship, a fear intensified by jealousy over David’s acclaim, awareness of David’s divine anointing, and Saul’s own spiritual rebellion and demonic torment. |
    |