Why did sacrifices persist post-reforms?
How did the people continue sacrificing despite Manasseh's reforms in 2 Chronicles 33:17?

Setting the Scene (2 Chronicles 33)

• Manasseh began reigning at twelve, “did evil in the sight of the LORD” (v. 2), filling Judah with idols and altars to false gods (vv. 3–7).

• After being taken captive to Babylon, he “humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers” (v. 12) and was restored to Jerusalem.

• Reformed king: “He removed the foreign gods … rebuilt the altar of the LORD and offered sacrifices of peace offerings and thank offerings on it” (vv. 15–16).

• Yet v. 17 records, “Nevertheless, the people still sacrificed at the high places, but only to the LORD their God.”


Why High Places Lingered

• Deep-rooted habit

– Generations had worshiped on local hills; the practice felt normal (cf. 1 Kings 3:2).

• Convenience over covenant obedience

– Temple worship required travel to Jerusalem; local sites were easier (Deuteronomy 12:13-14 forbade this).

• Mixed signals from leadership

– Manasseh destroyed idols but apparently left the physical high-place structures standing; people interpreted that as tacit permission.

• Incomplete teaching

– After decades of apostasy, Levites and priests scattered; sound instruction had to be rebuilt (2 Chronicles 15:3).


How Sacrifices Continued Despite the Reforms

• Physical structures still present

– Altars, platforms, and shrines remained usable even after idols were removed.

• Popular initiative, not royal directive

– The text singles out “the people,” indicating grass-roots persistence rather than royal endorsement.

• Shift in object, not in location

– They now “sacrificed … only to the LORD” (v. 17), showing spiritual improvement while clinging to old geography.

• Lack of immediate judgment

– God had just shown mercy to Manasseh; absence of swift discipline may have reinforced the practice for a season.


Scriptural Parallels

• Asa’s partial reform: “The high places were not removed, but Asa’s heart was fully devoted to the LORD” (1 Kings 15:14).

• Jehoshaphat: similar pattern (2 Chronicles 20:33).

• Josiah, Manasseh’s grandson, finally demolished every high place (2 Kings 23:8-20), completing what earlier kings left undone.


Lessons Drawn from 2 Chronicles 33:17

• External change can outpace internal transformation; structures of past sin often remain unless intentionally uprooted.

• Convenience can masquerade as devotion, tempting believers to obey “most” of God’s Word while neglecting specifics.

• Leadership must pair repentance with thorough teaching and decisive action to guide a nation—or a household—into full obedience.

• God’s patience, seen in allowing partial reforms, points to His desire for eventual, wholehearted conformity to His revealed will (Romans 2:4).

What is the meaning of 2 Chronicles 33:17?
Top of Page
Top of Page