Why does Jesus mention fasting in Matt 9:15?
Why does Jesus use the metaphor of fasting in Matthew 9:15 to describe His disciples' behavior?

Canonical Text and Immediate Context

“Jesus answered, ‘Can the wedding guests mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them? The days will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them, and then they will fast.’ ” (Matthew 9:15). The statement is delivered after John’s disciples ask why they and the Pharisees fast, but Jesus’ disciples do not (v. 14).


First-Century Practice of Fasting

In Second-Temple Judaism voluntary fasts expressed mourning, repentance, and petition (cf. Ezra 8:21; Zechariah 7:3-5). Pharisaic tradition elevated the practice to twice weekly (Luke 18:12). Rabbinic sources (m. Taʿanit 1.4-7) confirm that festive seasons such as weddings were exceptions because joy was mandated (Deuteronomy 16:14-15).


The Bridegroom Motif in the Hebrew Scriptures

Yahweh portrays Himself as Israel’s bridegroom (Isaiah 62:5; Hosea 2:19-20). By adopting the title “bridegroom,” Jesus tacitly equates Himself with the covenant Lord, underscoring both His divinity and covenant-renewal mission (Jeremiah 31:31-34). The metaphor therefore roots itself in a consistent canonical trajectory rather than later theological interpolation.


Why Fasting Is Inappropriate During the Bridegroom’s Presence

1. Disposition of Joy: Weddings were marked by feasting, music, and dancing; mourning practices were suspended (m. Moed Qatan 1.7).

2. Messianic Fulfillment: Jesus’ miracles (Matthew 8-9) demonstrate “kingdom come” realities. To fast in that moment would deny the eschatological in-breaking.

3. Christological Self-Disclosure: The metaphor signals that Jesus is more than a rabbi; He is the long-awaited divine groom, validating His authority to redefine religious practice (Matthew 12:6-8).


Why Fasting Will Become Appropriate Again

“The bridegroom will be taken from them.” The Greek aparthē is used of violent removal (cf. Acts 8:33, LXX of Isaiah 53:8). Jesus anticipates the crucifixion, burial, and ascension. After His departure, fasting returns as a fitting expression of longing and petition (Acts 13:2-3; 14:23), yet now oriented toward His promised return (Revelation 22:20).


Already-Not-Yet Eschatology

Fasting after the ascension marks the tension between inaugurated and consummated kingdom. The early church fasted for guidance (Acts 13) and solidarity with the persecuted (Hebrews 13:3). Modern believers fast to align desire with Christ’s lordship while anticipating bodily resurrection (Romans 8:23).


Archaeological and Cultural Corroboration

First-century Galilean winepresses (Migdal excavations, 2009-2013) and stone vessels at Cana (Khirbet Qana, 2015 report) reflect large-scale wedding feasts matching John 2. Ossuaries bearing phrases like “Yahweh help” reveal expectant Messianic piety consistent with Jesus’ arrival as groom.


Practical Discipleship Implications

• Fast with Christ-centered expectancy, not legalistic display (Matthew 6:16-18).

• Celebrate the sacraments as foretastes of the marriage supper of the Lamb (1 Corinthians 11:26; Revelation 19:9).

• Let rhythms of feasting and fasting testify to the historical resurrection, the ongoing intercession of Christ, and the certainty of His return.


Unified Biblical Theology

From Edenic marriage imagery (Genesis 2:24) to eschatological banquet, Scripture coherently presents God’s covenant relationship as a marriage. Jesus’ fasting metaphor situates His ministry within this framework, affirming the trustworthiness of both Old and New Testaments and inviting every hearer to covenantal union with the risen Lord.

How does the imagery of the bridegroom in Matthew 9:15 relate to Old Testament prophecies?
Top of Page
Top of Page