Why does Paul admit to failing to do good in Romans 7:19? I. Scriptural Text “For I do not do the good I want to do. Instead, I keep on doing the evil I do not want to do.” (Romans 7:19) II. Placement in Romans and Authorial Purpose Paul writes Romans c. A.D. 56–57 from Corinth. Chapters 1–8 form a single theological argument: universal sin (1–3), justification by faith (3–5), union with Christ that breaks sin’s dominion (6), the war with indwelling sin (7), and life in the Spirit (8). Romans 7:19 sits in the “already/not-yet” tension between definitive deliverance (6:6–7) and progressive sanctification (8:13). III. The Identity of the Speaker in Romans 7:14-25 1. Converted Paul: most church fathers (Origen, Chrysostom), Reformers (Luther, Calvin), and modern exegetes note the present-tense verbs, Paul’s delight in God’s law (7:22), and his cry for deliverance answered immediately in Christ (7:25). 2. Unconverted Paul: some argue vv. 14-25 describe the pre-Christian Jew under Law. While the grammar can be read that way, the unregenerate elsewhere are said to be “hostile to God” and do not “submit to His law” (8:7). The weight of lexical, grammatical, and theological evidence favors Paul speaking as a regenerate man describing the ongoing battle with sin’s residual power. IV. Lexical and Syntactical Insights • θέλω (“I want”) points to renewed volition aligned with God’s will. • ποιεῖν/πράσσω (“do”/“practice”) signal habitual action; Paul says sin still finds expression in behavior. • κακόν (“evil”) vs. καλόν (“good”) reveals an objective moral standard, not relativism. V. Doctrine of Indwelling Sin Genesis 3 records the Fall; Psalm 51:5 and Jeremiah 17:9 describe a corrupt nature inherited by all. Regeneration gives a new heart (Ezekiel 36:26), yet “the flesh” (sarx) remains (Galatians 5:17). Paul’s confession illustrates: 1. Total inability apart from grace (Romans 7:18). 2. Ongoing impotence of the Law to conquer sin (7:5, 13). 3. Necessity of the Spirit’s power (8:2-4). VI. Theological Parallels • Galatians 5:16-18 – “the Spirit desires what is contrary to the flesh.” • 1 John 1:8 – believers still sin, yet possess an Advocate (2:1). • Psalm 32 – David’s struggle, then relief in confession. VII. Historical Commentary Augustine (Confessions VIII) cited Romans 7 in his own moral conflict. Martin Luther called it the “Magna Carta of Christian realism,” grounding simul iustus et peccator—“simultaneously righteous and sinful.” VIII. Manuscript Reliability Romans survives in P⁴⁶ (c. A.D. 200), Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus (4th c.). All witnesses read identically in 7:19, reinforcing textual certainty. IX. Archaeological and External Corroboration 1. Erastus inscription (Corinth) confirms a city treasurer named in Romans 16:23. 2. Delphi decree (A.D. 52) synchronizes Gallio’s proconsulship (Acts 18:12-17), dating the Corinthian stay during which Romans was penned. These finds anchor Paul as a real historical figure writing to real churches. X. Philosophical and Behavioral Science Observations Conscience, a universal human feature (Romans 2:15), evidences design: moral law implies a Moral Lawgiver. Modern cognitive dissonance theory mirrors Paul’s “double mind,” yet offers no ultimate remedy; Scripture does—in Christ and the indwelling Spirit. XI. Pastoral Application 1. Expect conflict: struggle is evidence of new life, not its negation. 2. Utilize means of grace: Scripture meditation (Psalm 119:11), prayer (Hebrews 4:16), fellowship (Hebrews 10:24-25). 3. Rest in positional righteousness while pursuing progressive holiness (Philippians 2:12-13). XII. Christ the Deliverer Paul’s lament crescendos: “What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me…? Thanks be to God, through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Romans 7:24-25). Chapter 8 answers with the Spirit’s liberating power and the certainty of final glorification. The resurrection secures both justification (4:25) and sanctification (6:4). XIII. Conclusion Paul admits failure in Romans 7:19 to expose the impotence of self-effort, highlight the ongoing reality of indwelling sin even for the regenerate, and drive believers to depend wholly on Christ and the Spirit. The verse is not a defeatist concession but a candid acknowledgment that magnifies grace, leading directly into the triumphant “no condemnation” of Romans 8:1. |
    |