Why were people in John 11:56 questioning whether Jesus would attend the Passover? Immediate Context The raising of Lazarus (John 11:1-44) had just occurred in Bethany, less than two miles from Jerusalem (John 11:18). This public miracle triggered an official Sanhedrin meeting that resolved: “If we let Him go on like this, everyone will believe in Him… So from that day on they plotted to kill Him” (John 11:48, 53). Jesus therefore withdrew to Ephraim (John 11:54), a safe rural village about fifteen miles north-east of the city. Against that background pilgrims arriving for Passover wondered aloud whether Jesus, now under an open arrest order, would dare to appear. Chronological Setting According to the Synoptics, this Passover falls in the spring of A.D. 33 (cf. Luke 3:1; John 2:20; Usshurian-style chronology places Creation at 4004 B.C., the Exodus c. 1446 B.C., and this festival exactly typologically timed). John records three previous feasts attended by Jesus (John 2:13; 5:1; 6:4; 7:2-10). None bore such explicit death threats. Hence the suspense. Political-Religious Tensions 1. Sanhedrin jurisdiction: Rome allowed the council to police religious crimes (Josephus, Ant. 20.200). Blasphemy carried capital weight (Leviticus 24:16). 2. Passover crowds: Josephus records upward of two million pilgrims in later decades (War 6.425-427). Large crowds heightened Rome’s fear of revolt, so soldiers were posted on the Antonia Fortress overlooking the Temple (cf. Acts 21:31-35 archaeological stairway still visible). The leaders worried that Jesus’ presence among such a crowd could ignite messianic fervor (John 12:12-19). Sanhedrin Edict and Public Awareness John 11:57 clarifies the rulers’ strategy: public surveillance. First-century Judea lacked mass media, so temple-mount announcements and synagogue readings disseminated the warrant. Purification baths (mikva’ot excavated along the southern Temple steps) became gathering points where the rumor spread: “Will He come?” Pilgrimage Customs and Ritual Purification Pilgrims arrived a week early to complete ritual cleansing (Numbers 9:6-13). Archaeology uncovers over one hundred mikva’ot surrounding Herodian Jerusalem, matching John’s note that “many went up… to purify themselves.” While waiting, they naturally discussed the most controversial rabbi of their generation. Messianic Expectations and Prophetic Backdrop Daniel 9:24-27’s seventy-“sevens” placed messianic anticipation at that very era (cf. Dead Sea Scroll 4Q174). Zechariah 9:9 foretold a king entering Jerusalem on a colt—fulfilled days later (John 12:14-16). Pilgrims sensed prophetic convergence, intensifying their curiosity about Jesus’ appearance. Jesus’ Prior Passover Attendance Pattern • First Passover of ministry: temple cleansing (John 2:13-22) made Him notorious among priestly circles. • Galilean Passover (John 6:4): He fed five thousand, provoking a forced-king movement (John 6:15). • Feast of Booths (John 7): He arrived secretly “because the Jews were trying to kill Him” (John 7:1). That precedent of delayed attendance fed speculation: might He repeat the tactic? Geographical Movements Leading to the Feast After Ephraim, Synoptic parallels (Luke 17:11–18:35) show Jesus moving south through Perea, avoiding Judean strongholds until His “hour” (John 13:1). The crowd, unaware of this itinerary, only knew He was not yet in Jerusalem, hence the Temple-mount discussions. Implications for Christological Understanding Their question unwittingly spotlighted Jesus’ sovereign timing: “My time has not yet come” (John 7:6). He alone would lay down His life at the precise prophetic moment (John 10:18; Exodus 12:6; 1 Corinthians 5:7). Their uncertainty contrasted with His certainty. Typological Significance of Passover Passover commemorated liberation through a spotless lamb’s blood (Exodus 12). John introduces Jesus as “the Lamb of God” (John 1:29). Whether He would attend was not merely social curiosity—it was soteriological necessity. His forthcoming crucifixion during Passover would fulfill the typology in exacting detail, down to the unbroken bones (Exodus 12:46; John 19:36). Archaeological and Historical Corroboration • Bethany’s first-century tombs match the Lazarus narrative contextually. • Caiaphas’ ossuary, discovered 1990 and inscribed “Yehosef bar Qayafa,” authenticates the high priest named in John 11:49. • The Pilate Stone (1961) confirms the prefect who would sanction the arrest the leaders sought, tying John’s narrative to hard epigraphy. Application and Theological Reflection The crowd’s question exposes every heart’s dilemma: Will we meet Jesus on His terms or shrink back in fear of authorities, opinion, or cost? The leaders feared losing “place and nation” (John 11:48); the pilgrims feared missing the Messiah. Today the same forked road remains—neutral curiosity is impossible once presented with the risen Lord (Acts 17:31). Summary People wondered about Jesus’ attendance because: 1. An open warrant for His arrest existed. 2. He had temporarily withdrawn from public view. 3. Passover crowds magnified both danger and opportunity. 4. Prophetic expectations made His presence decisive. 5. His past pattern of unpredictable festival appearances left the outcome uncertain. Their questioning set the stage for the triumphal entry, the crucifixion at Passover, and the resurrection history confirms. Scripture, manuscript evidence, archaeology, and fulfilled prophecy converge to show that the Lamb did, indeed, arrive right on time. |
    |