Why emphasize fearing God's name?
Why is the fear of God's name emphasized in Deuteronomy 28:58?

Deuteronomy 28:58

“If you are not careful to observe every word of this law, which is written in this book, and to fear this glorious and awesome name—the LORD your God—”


Theological Rationale

1. Holiness: God’s name represents His absolute otherness (Leviticus 19:2). To trivialize it invites judgment (Leviticus 24:15-16).

2. Exclusivity: Israel must fear no other “name” (Deuteronomy 6:13; 10:20). Fear of Yahweh displaces idolatry.

3. Covenant Enforcement: Ancient Near Eastern vassal treaties ended with invocations of the suzerain’s deity (e.g., Sefire Stele, 8th c. BC). Deuteronomy mirrors that form but centers the covenant on Yahweh’s personal name, making treachery not merely political but theological.


Ancient Treaty Parallels

Hittite and Neo-Assyrian treaty tablets (Boğazköy, Tel Tayinat) list blessings for loyalty and escalating curses, sometimes even detailing siege-cannibalism—precisely what Deuteronomy 28:52-57 predicts. The structural match corroborates Mosaic authorship in the Late Bronze Age setting (ca. 1406 BC) and shows why the fear of the suzerain-God’s name is the climax of covenant stipulations.


Historical Fulfilment Validates the Warning

• Assyrian exile of the northern kingdom (2 Kings 17:6) and Babylonian exile of Judah (2 Kings 25) reproduce Deuteronomy 28 curses.

• A.D. 70 Roman destruction and diaspora mirror 28:64-68. First-century historian Josephus (Wars 6.201-213) records siege cannibalism, echoing 28:53-57. Historic realization underscores why Moses singled out fear of God’s name: the stakes are real, the penalty certain.


Psychological and Ethical Dimension

Reverential fear functions as an internal governor. Studies in moral psychology demonstrate that transcendent accountability strongly predicts ethical restraint. Scripture anticipates this: “Fear of the LORD lengthens life” (Proverbs 10:27). Deuteronomy 28:58 makes covenant obedience a heart posture, not mere external compliance (cf. Deuteronomy 10:16).


Scribal Tradition Safeguarding the Name

Masoretic scribes substituted ʼᾱdōnāy for YHWH when reading aloud, inserting qere markings to protect against misuse (cf. Exodus 20:7). The meticulous transmission of Deuteronomy—including hundreds of complete medieval codices and fragments predating Christ by a millennium—underscores the gravity ascribed to the Name.


Continuity into the New Covenant

Jesus teaches, “Do not fear those who kill the body… rather fear Him who can destroy both soul and body in hell” (Matthew 10:28). Acts 9:31 describes early believers “walking in the fear of the Lord.” Revelation closes with the universal call, “Fear God and give Him glory” (Revelation 14:7). The emphasis remains because the holiness of God’s name has not diminished; the cross and resurrection, instead, magnify it (Philippians 2:9-11).


Practical Implications

1. Worship: God’s name demands reverent speech and conduct (Psalm 111:9).

2. Obedience: Fear and love jointly motivate covenant faithfulness (Deuteronomy 6:5; 10:12).

3. Evangelism: A right view of God’s majesty exposes human sinfulness and the necessity of Christ’s atonement (Romans 3:23-26).

4. Community Ethics: Societal flourishing is tethered to honoring God (Proverbs 14:34). Israel’s decline illustrates the alternative.


Conclusion

Deuteronomy 28:58 highlights fear of God’s name because the covenant’s success hinges on Israel’s recognition of Yahweh’s unmatched holiness, authority, and grace. By enshrining His “glorious and awesome name” at the very threshold of the covenant’s most severe judgments, Moses teaches that reverential fear is both the fountainhead of obedience and the safeguard against the catastrophic consequences of apostasy. The verse thus serves as a perpetual summons—for Israel and for all nations—to honor, adore, and obey the Creator whose Name is above every name.

How does Deuteronomy 28:58 relate to the concept of covenant obedience in the Bible?
Top of Page
Top of Page