Why is self-judgment emphasized in 1 Corinthians 11:31? Text and Translation 1 Corinthians 11:31 : “But if we judged ourselves properly, we would not come under judgment.” The Greek verbs are krinō (“judge, evaluate, discern”) and diakrinō (“discern thoroughly, distinguish”). Paul employs a reflexive construction—“if we were judging ourselves”—to underscore personal responsibility before God. Immediate Literary Context: The Lord’s Supper in Corinth Verses 17-34 address abuses at the Lord’s Table—factionalism, drunkenness, and disregard for the poor (vv. 18-22). Because the Supper proclaims “the Lord’s death until He comes” (v. 26), irreverence invites divine discipline—weakness, sickness, and even death (v. 30). Self-judgment is therefore presented as the preventive remedy. Old Testament Foundations • Psalm 139:23-24—David invites divine searching before discipline. • Lamentations 3:40—“Let us examine and test our ways.” • Numbers 9:6-13—unworthy participants excluded from Passover, the prototype of the Lord’s Supper. Self-examination thus has covenantal precedent: holiness precedes approach to a holy God. Theological Significance: Sanctification and Communion Self-judgment is part of progressive sanctification. By confessing sin (1 John 1:9) believers appropriate the once-for-all atonement (Hebrews 10:14) and restore fellowship without incurring condemnation (Romans 8:1). Because the Supper visibly unites believers to Christ’s body, unchecked sin violates that union and obscures the gospel (John 13:35). Ecclesiological Rationale: Unity and Purity of the Church Corinth’s schisms (1 Corinthians 1:10-12) re-emerge at the table. Self-judgment guards unity by forcing each member to consider the rest of the body (Philippians 2:3-4). Church discipline (Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 5) is God’s corporate safety net, but Paul prefers the less drastic, individual step of self-assessment. Christological Basis The Supper reenacts the New Covenant in Christ’s blood (Luke 22:20). To partake “unworthily” (v. 27) is to dishonor the incarnate, crucified, and risen Lord. Proper self-judgment aligns the believer with the cruciform pattern of repentance and faith (Galatians 2:20). Historical Witness and Patristic Commentary • Didache 9-10 (1st cent.): believers instructed to confess sins before the Eucharist. • Justin Martyr, Apology I.66: only those “living according to Christ’s precepts” may partake. • Tertullian, De Corona 3: self-examination distinguishes Christians from pagans. Such unanimity shows the early church understood 1 Corinthians 11:31 as a perpetual command. Archaeological Corroboration The Gallio Inscription at Delphi (AD 51-52) precisely dates Paul’s Corinthian ministry (Acts 18:12-17), anchoring 1 Corinthians within living memory of eyewitnesses. Such proximity increases the letter’s evidentiary weight. Practical Application • Pre-Communion silence for confession (Psalm 32:5). • Reconciliation with offended brethren before partaking (Matthew 5:23-24). • Personal inventory: motives, relationships, stewardship, purity (2 Corinthians 13:5). • Prayer pattern: Adoration, Confession, Thanksgiving, Supplication (ACTS), concretely embodying krinō. Personal Examination Questions 1. Am I harboring known sin unconfessed? 2. Have I wronged anyone without seeking restitution? 3. Do I cherish Christ above all this week? 4. Is there evidence of Spirit-produced fruit (Galatians 5:22-23)? These questions operationalize self-judgment and prevent divine chastening. Summary Self-judgment in 1 Corinthians 11:31 is emphasized because: • It preserves the sanctity of the Lord’s Supper. • It fosters unity and love within the body. • It aligns believers with Christ’s atoning work. • It averts God’s disciplinary intervention. • It produces transformative holiness that authenticates the gospel. By regularly examining ourselves under God’s authoritative Word, we honor the risen Christ, protect our witness, and fulfill our chief end—to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. |
    |