Why is divine revelation needed?
Why is divine revelation necessary according to Matthew 11:27?

Text and Immediate Context

Matthew 11:27 : “All things have been entrusted to Me by My Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son—and to those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him.”

The verse sits in a unit (vv. 20-30) where Jesus contrasts unrepentant cities with those who receive His “easy yoke.” The statement is bracketed by references to judgment (vv. 20-24) and rest (vv. 28-30), underscoring that revelation is the decisive pivot between condemnation and salvation.


Theological Necessity of Revelation

1. Transcendence and Inaccessibility

God is infinite (Isaiah 55:8-9). Human reason and observation reach only “the invisible attributes” (Romans 1:20) but cannot penetrate His inner life. Hence Jesus states, “No one knows the Father except the Son.”

2. Human Fallenness

Sin darkens understanding (Ephesians 4:18). Even if finite reason could, in principle, apprehend God, moral rebellion suppresses truth (Romans 1:21). Therefore revelation must be graciously given, not merely discovered.

3. Mediated Exclusively Through the Son

Authority—“All things have been entrusted to Me”—grounds the Son’s unique ability to disclose the Father. Divine self-disclosure is Christological; the Son is both Revealer and Content of revelation (John 1:18).

4. Salvific Purpose

The surrounding invitation (“Come to Me… and I will give you rest,” v. 28) ties revelation directly to redemption. Knowing God is eternal life (John 17:3); therefore revelation is not optional information but the very means of salvation.


Progressive Biblical Pattern

• Old Testament glimpses: Theophanies (Exodus 3), prophetic words (Amos 3:7).

• Culmination in Christ: “In these last days He has spoken to us by His Son” (Hebrews 1:2).

• Ongoing ministry of the Spirit: “He will take from what is Mine and disclose it to you” (John 16:14).


General Revelation vs. Special Revelation

Natural theology and intelligent design arguments—fine-tuned constants, coded information in DNA (Meyer, Signature in the Cell)—establish rational warrant for a Designer but stop short of identifying the Father or providing atonement. Matthew 11:27 affirms that only special revelation through Christ bridges the epistemic and moral chasm.


Historical Confirmation by Resurrection

Divine revelation is validated by the historical resurrection. Minimal-facts data—empty tomb (Jerusalem factor), early 1 Corinthians 15 creed (within 5 years), eyewitness appearances—are attested by multiple independent sources (e.g., Josephus, Antiquities 18.3; Tacitus, Annals 15.44). The event stamps Jesus’ authority to reveal God (Romans 1:4).


Miraculous Corroboration

Documented healings in Acts (3:1-10) and modern medically verified cases (e.g., Lourdes Medical Bureau files, peer-reviewed study in Southern Medical Journal, Sept 2000) continue to attest God’s ongoing revelatory activity, consistent with Mark 16:20 that the Lord confirmed the word “by the signs that accompanied it.”


Philosophical and Behavioral Considerations

Epistemology: Finite minds require an infinite Knower’s self-disclosure to attain ultimate truth (Plantinga’s “external rationality”).

Psychology of Religion: Cross-cultural studies (Yale Human Cooperation Lab, 2016) show humans intuitively seek purpose beyond themselves, yet differ wildly on specifics—pointing to the need for an external, clarifying revelation.


Practical Implications

1. Humility—“to whom the Son chooses” confronts intellectual pride.

2. Urgency—without revelation, humanity remains under judgment (vv. 20-24).

3. Assurance—revelation guarantees that salvation rests on God’s initiative, not human speculation.

4. Mission—believers become secondary revealers, tasked to proclaim Christ so others may know the Father (2 Corinthians 5:20).


Conclusion

Divine revelation is necessary because only God can unveil Himself; sin and finitude render us incapable of discovering Him unaided; and Christ, authenticated by resurrection and ongoing works, is the exclusive, sufficient, and gracious Mediator of that revelation, as Matthew 11:27 decisively declares.

How does Matthew 11:27 support the concept of the Trinity?
Top of Page
Top of Page