What is the significance of reburial in 2 Samuel 21:13? Canonical Text and Immediate Setting 2 Samuel 21:13 records: “So David went and took the bones of Saul and his son Jonathan from the citizens of Jabesh-gilead (who had stolen them from the public square at Beth-shan, where the Philistines had hung them after they struck down Saul at Gilboa).” This verse lies in a pericope (21:1-14) that recounts a three-year famine during David’s reign. Yahweh reveals the famine’s cause: Saul’s attempted genocide of the Gibeonites, a breach of Israel’s covenant oath (Joshua 9). After reparations are made, David retrieves the bones of Saul and Jonathan—along with those of the seven executed descendants—and reburies them in the ancestral tomb of Kish at Zela in Benjamin. Verse 14 concludes, “After that God answered the prayer for the land,” linking the reburial to the lifting of covenantal curse. Historical-Cultural Background Ancient Near-Eastern honor culture regarded proper burial as essential for personal dignity, family reputation, and the hope of bodily resurrection at the last day (cf. Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12:2). Desecration or neglect of a corpse signified divine judgment (1 Kings 13:22; Jeremiah 22:19). Saul and Jonathan’s bodies had earlier been rescued by Jabesh-gileadites (1 Samuel 31:11-13) and temporarily entombed under a tamarisk tree. Yet the Philistine display at Beth-shan left their remains publicly dishonored, a lingering national shame. By relocating the bones to the family tomb, David restores royal honor, fulfills filial duty to his predecessor, and models covenantal piety. Covenant Justice and Bloodguilt Atonement Deuteronomy 21:1-9 prescribes removal of bloodguilt through ritual atonement when a slain person’s fate pollutes the land. Saul’s massacre of the Gibeonites violated Israel’s sworn oath; therefore the famine signified covenantal curse (Leviticus 26:3-4, 19-20). Executing Saul’s seven male descendants satisfied lex talionis within ancient Near-Eastern suzerain-vassal expectations of corporate solidarity. Yet full reconciliation required that the dishonored royal bones also be treated in righteousness. The reburial therefore completes the cycle of covenant justice and releases Yahweh’s blessing. Honor-Shame Reversal and Royal Legitimacy Ancient Mediterranean societies tied a king’s legitimacy to his treatment of the previous dynasty. By honoring Saul’s remains, David publicly rejects a policy of damnatio memoriae. This action demonstrates magnanimity, underscores Yahweh’s sovereign choice of Davidic kingship (1 Samuel 24:6; 26:9), and foreshadows the Messiah, the true “Son of David,” who restores the fallen house of Israel (Amos 9:11). Typological and Christological Significance 1. Exchange of death for life: The executed descendants of Saul (vv. 8-9) die to lift the curse, pointing toward the ultimate substitutionary death of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21). 2. Vindication through burial and resurrection hope: Just as David gathers bones into a family tomb awaiting final resurrection, God gathered Christ’s body into Joseph’s tomb, anticipating bodily resurrection (Luke 23:53-24:6). 3. Covenant oath integrity: David’s meticulous obedience mirrors Christ’s fulfillment of the Law (Matthew 5:17). Parallels to Other Biblical Reburials • Joseph’s bones transported from Egypt to Shechem (Genesis 50:25; Exodus 13:19; Joshua 24:32) affirm covenant continuity. • Reinterment of the prophet (1 Kings 13:31-32) protected the man of God’s remains and foretold Josiah’s reforms. • Asa’s burial with “aromatic spices” (2 Chronicles 16:14) highlights royal honor similar to Saul’s restored dignity. These parallels reinforce a theology wherein God remembers His servants beyond death, guaranteeing eschatological hope (Hebrews 11:22). Archaeological and Textual Insights • Family tombs cut into limestone hillsides of Benjamin (e.g., the rock-hewn tombs at Tell el-Ful, likely Gibeah of Saul) match the description of the “tomb of Kish.” • Iron Age I/IIa secondary burials—collection of bones into ossuaries or side niches—validate the plausibility of moving remains decades later. • Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th c. BC) containing the Aaronic blessing demonstrate transmission fidelity of Torah texts alluded to in the narrative. • Dead Sea Scroll 4QSam a (4Q51) preserves 2 Samuel 21 with only minor orthographic variants, corroborating the Masoretic text used by modern translations, underscoring the passage’s integrity. Conclusion The reburial in 2 Samuel 21:13 is far more than an act of piety toward dead kings. It embodies covenant restoration, national healing, vindication of rightful kingship, foreshadows Christ’s redemptive burial and resurrection, and testifies to the meticulous consistency of Scriptural revelation. |
    |