Why mock Jesus in Luke 23:37?
Why did the soldiers mock Jesus in Luke 23:37?

The Passage Under Consideration

“The soldiers also mocked Him and came up to offer Him sour wine. They said, ‘If You are the King of the Jews, save Yourself!’ ” (Luke 23:36-37). The sarcasm climaxes in verse 38: “Above Him was posted an inscription: THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.” Luke deliberately places the soldiers’ derision at the center of his crucifixion narrative to expose the world’s rejection of its rightful King and to highlight messianic prophecy fulfilled at the very moment of apparent defeat.


Immediate Literary Context

Luke frames the soldiers’ mockery between two parallel scoffings: first by the Jewish leaders (23:35) and finally by the criminal crucified beside Jesus (23:39). The structure shows universal contempt—religious, military-political, and criminal—revealing humanity at every stratum united in sin (cf. Romans 3:23). Luke contrasts this with the solitary recognition of Jesus’ innocence by Pilate (23:4, 14) and, later, the centurion (23:47). The juxtaposition magnifies Christ’s patient endurance “for the joy set before Him” (Hebrews 12:2).


Historical-Cultural Background: Roman Military Mockery

a. Ritualized Humiliation. Roman execution squads routinely ridiculed condemned rebels. Contemporary historians (e.g., Josephus, Wars 5.11.1) describe soldiers hailing prisoners as mock kings, a practice meant to reinforce imperial dominance and deter treason.

b. The Cohors Praetoria. Gospel parallels (Matthew 27:27; Mark 15:16) specify a whole cohort (≈600 men) gathering for sport. Luke abbreviates but assumes the same milieu. Archaeology confirms the presence of auxiliary troops in Jerusalem; Latin inscriptions from the “Pilate Stone” at Caesarea attest to prefect Pontius Pilate’s administration (discovered 1961, Israel Antiquities).

c. Sour Wine (ὄξος). Soldiers’ common rations of diluted vinegar (Pliny, Nat. Hist. 14.57) doubled as cheap refreshment and taunting gesture—offering relief while daring the victim to “save” Himself.


Political Motivation: A Pretender to Caesar’s Throne

“King of the Jews” carried treasonous overtones (John 19:12). Soldiers, agents of Rome, lampooned any rival claimant. By dressing Jesus in a mock cloak and crown (Matthew 27:28-29) and hailing Him “Hail, King of the Jews!” they stage a parody coronation that inverts the true cosmic enthronement taking place (Philippians 2:9-11).


Prophetic Fulfillment

a. Psalm 22:7-8—“All who see me mock me… ‘He trusts in the LORD; let the LORD rescue Him.’ ”

b. Psalm 69:21—“They gave me vinegar to drink.”

c. Isaiah 50:6; 53:3—The Servant is “despised and rejected.”

Luke, steeped in Septuagint vocabulary, signals that every sneer aligns with Scripture’s forecast, underscoring God’s sovereignty.


Theological Motifs: Substitution and Shame

Crucifixion was designed not only to kill but to shame (Hebrews 12:2). Christ bears the curse of the law (Deuteronomy 21:23; Galatians 3:13). The soldiers’ mockery externalizes the curse; Jesus absorbs it silently (Isaiah 53:7), fulfilling the role of sin-bearing substitute. Their cry, “Save Yourself,” tempts Him to abandon the cross; His refusal secures our salvation (Mark 10:45).


Psychological and Behavioral Dynamics

Groupthink and deindividuation intensify cruelty. Modern behavioral science notes that anonymity in uniform disinhibits aggression. Yet Luke personalizes the soldiers later: one centurion confesses, “Surely this was a righteous Man” (23:47), illustrating individual accountability and the potential for repentance even among oppressors.


Legal Considerations

Roman procedure allowed soldiers latitude once the sentence was passed. Philo (Flaccus 6 §36) records flogged prisoners ridiculed as kings. Legally, the inscription (titulus) stated the charge; mocking that charge dramatized Rome’s victory over sedition.


Comparative Gospel Data

Matthew and Mark mention the soldiers kneeling in feigned homage; John adds the purple robe and crown of thorns. By collating accounts, we see a composite tableau: strip, cloak, reed scepter, crown, spitting, beating, vinegar—each element heightening the satire of royalty. Luke, writing for a Gentile readership, emphasizes the military’s role and Pilate’s repeated declarations of innocence.


Linguistic and Textual Notes

The verb ἐμυκτήριζον (23:35) for the rulers and ἐνέπαιζον (23:36) for soldiers both derive from παιζω, “to play,” connoting sport. All extant Greek manuscripts—from P75 (early 3rd c.) to codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus—agree on the wording, underscoring textual stability. No variant alters the sense: the soldiers mocked.


Archaeological Corroboration

a. Gabbatha Pavement. Lithostratos stones under today’s Ecce Homo Convent exhibit Roman game boards carved by soldiers. One such “Basileus Game” depicts a mock-coronation path, paralleling Gospel descriptions.

b. Crucifixion Nails. The 1968 find at Giv‘at ha-Mivtar of Yehohanan’s anklebone pierced by an 11 cm nail confirms crucifixion methodology as portrayed.

c. Ossuary of Caiaphas and Caiaphas’ family tomb (1990) anchor the narrative’s historical actors.


Christological Irony: Real vs. Pretend Kingship

The soldiers unknowingly proclaim truth. Luke relishes irony: while they deride, heaven enthrones. Paul later echoes, “None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory” (1 Corinthians 2:8).


Pastoral and Devotional Application

Believers facing ridicule find solidarity in the Savior who endured mockery yet “committed Himself to Him who judges justly” (1 Peter 2:23). We answer taunts not with retaliation but gospel grace, knowing that Christ’s seeming weakness conquered death.


Summary

The soldiers mocked Jesus because:

• Roman custom relished humiliating condemned rebels.

• Politically, “King of the Jews” challenged Caesar.

• Prophecy required Messiah to be scorned.

• Theologically, shame was integral to atonement.

• Psychologically, mob dynamics bred cruelty.

Their derision, while intended for degradation, became divine proclamation: Jesus is indeed King—and by refusing to “save Himself,” He saved all who trust in Him.

How can we defend our faith when others question Jesus' authority like in Luke 23:37?
Top of Page
Top of Page