Why did the chief priests and elders persuade the crowd against Jesus in Matthew 27:20? Text of Matthew 27:20 “But the chief priests and elders persuaded the crowds to ask for Barabbas and to have Jesus put to death.” Immediate Narrative Setting Pilate has already declared Jesus innocent of any crime deserving death (v. 23). Following the Passover custom, he proposes releasing either Jesus or the notorious rebel Barabbas (vv. 15–17). The religious authorities fear Pilate may free Jesus, so they intervene, canvassing the people gathered in the outer court to sway the vote. Historical–Political Pressures in First-Century Jerusalem Passover season regularly drew two to three hundred thousand pilgrims (Josephus, War 6.9.3). Rome posted extra troops to suppress nationalistic riots. The chief priests, an aristocratic Sadducean minority, depended on Rome to retain their positions and the lucrative Temple franchise (John 11:48). Jesus’ acclaim threatened to ignite messianic hopes and destabilize their negotiated status. Religious Motivation: Protection of Doctrinal Authority Jesus exposed Temple corruption (Matthew 21:12–13) and publicly refuted Pharisaic oral traditions (23:1-36). Accepting His messianic claim would obligate the leadership to submit to His authority, forsake power, and acknowledge their own sin. Rather than repent, they chose to silence Him (John 5:43). Fulfillment of Prophecy Isaiah 53:3 foretold, “He was despised and rejected by men.” Psalm 118:22 prophesied, “The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.” The leaders’ persuasion of the crowd fulfilled these Scriptures; God’s redemptive plan required the Messiah’s rejection (Acts 2:23). Spiritual Blindness and Judicial Hardening Repeated rejection of Christ’s signs—healings, exorcisms, resurrection of Lazarus—cultivated hardness of heart (John 12:37-40; cf. Isaiah 6:9-10). Romans 11:7-10 explains that Israel’s leaders stumbled because they pursued righteousness by works rather than faith. Behavioral science labels such entrenchment “motivated reasoning”; Scripture identifies it as the noetic effects of sin (Ephesians 4:18). Crowd Dynamics: Contagion, Deindividuation, and Authority Cues Large festival crowds were susceptible to influential elites (Luke 23:23). The priests likely deployed Temple officers (John 7:32, 45-46) to prime the crowd. Social-psychological research on conformity (Asch, Milgram) illustrates that perceived authority plus group momentum can override personal conviction—parallel to the mob’s sudden shift from “Hosanna” to “Crucify!” Legal Maneuvering Before Pilate Roman jurisprudence allowed accusers to present public testimony. By orchestrating a demonstration, the Sanhedrin could pressure Pilate with the threat of riot (Matthew 27:24; John 19:12). If unrest erupted, Pilate’s career was at risk; thus he capitulated. Strategy of Misinformation and Framing The leaders had earlier circulated that Jesus was a Sabbath-breaker (John 9:16), demon-possessed (Matthew 12:24), and a political rival to Caesar (Luke 23:2). In the plaza they likely repeated these slanders, portraying Barabbas as a freedom fighter while branding Jesus a blasphemer deserving death (Leviticus 24:16). Scriptural Pattern of Prophetic Rejection Moses (Exodus 2:14), Samuel (1 Samuel 8:7), Elijah (1 Kings 19:10), and Jeremiah (Jeremiah 26:8-11) faced similar hostility. Acts 7:52 summarizes: “Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute?” The pattern culminates in Christ, the ultimate Prophet (Deuteronomy 18:15). Typological Significance: The Scapegoat On the Day of Atonement two goats were presented (Leviticus 16). One was released; the other bore the people’s sin and was killed. Barabbas and Jesus reenact this picture: the guilty rebel goes free; the innocent Lamb dies (John 1:29). The priests, unaware, enact God’s typology. Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility God predetermined the crucifixion (Acts 4:27-28), yet the priests acted volitionally and remain culpable (Matthew 23:35-36). Their persuasion demonstrates concurrence, where divine foreknowledge coexists with genuine human choice. Corroborative Evidence for Historicity a. Tacitus (Annals 15.44) and Josephus (Antiquities 18.3.3) record Jesus’ execution under Pilate, confirming Gospel reports. b. The Pilate Stone (discovered 1961, Caesarea Maritima) authenticates Pilate’s historical role. c. First-century ossuaries bearing names “Joseph Caiaphas” (1990 find) and “Yehohanan” (a crucified victim) verify priestly involvement and Roman crucifixion practice. d. Manuscript evidence: over 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts affirm textual stability; the earliest papyri (P52, c. AD 125) place John’s Passion narrative within a generation of events. Theological Implications for the Reader The priests’ persuasion warns of religious pride blinding one to truth. It urges self-examination: Will I follow the crowd or the Christ? Peter later offered forgiveness even to these leaders (Acts 3:17-19). Likewise, today’s hearer may repent, receive the risen Savior, and glorify God—the very purpose for which humanity was created. |
    |