Why reference Moses' law in Matt 22:24?
Why did the Sadducees reference Moses' law in Matthew 22:24?

Context of the Question

“Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies without children, his brother is to marry the widow and raise up offspring for him.’” (Matthew 22:24). The Sadducees quote Deuteronomy 25:5 – 6 to pose a hypothetical involving seven brothers and one wife, hoping to undermine belief in the resurrection.


Who Were the Sadducees?

They were the Temple-controlling priestly elite, many of whom traced lineage to Zadok. Josephus (Ant. 18.1.4) records that they recognized only the written Torah (Genesis–Deuteronomy) as binding Scripture, rejecting later prophets, writings, and the oral traditions cherished by the Pharisees. Acts 23:8 confirms their doctrinal distinctives: “For the Sadducees say there is no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit.”


Why Appeal Specifically to Moses?

1. Canonical Boundary: By citing Moses, the Sadducees stay within the sole portion of Scripture they considered authoritative.

2. Argument from Accepted Premises: If they can show that Moses’ own law creates a logical absurdity when combined with resurrection, they believe they can dismiss resurrection without ever acknowledging prophetic or wisdom texts that clearly teach it (Job 19:25–27; Daniel 12:2).

3. Public Credibility: Quoting Moses in the Temple courts gave their challenge weight in full view of pilgrims who revered the Law (cf. Deuteronomy 6:4–9).


Levirate Marriage in Mosaic Law

Deuteronomy 25:5–6: “If brothers dwell together and one of them dies without having a son, the widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother is to take her as his wife… The first son she bears will carry on the name of the dead brother.”

Purpose:

• Preserve the deceased man’s name and property within Israel (Numbers 27:8–11).

• Protect the widow economically and socially.

• Maintain tribal allotments (Joshua 13–21).

Historical Instances: Judah/Tamar (Genesis 38); Boaz/Ruth (Ruth 4:10). Nuzi tablets (15th cent. BC) document analogous customs, corroborating the antiquity of the practice.


The Sadducean Logical Trap

Their scenario of seven sequential marriages intends a reductio ad absurdum: in the resurrection “whose wife will she be?” If Jesus names one brother, He seems to violate Moses; if He rejects them all, He appears to deny marriage’s sanctity. Either outcome, they suppose, discredits resurrection.


Jesus’ Counter-Argument from Exodus

Jesus answers with the very Torah they revere: “Have you not read what God said to you: ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’?” (Matthew 22:31–32 quoting Exodus 3:6). Present-tense “I am” presupposes the patriarchs’ continued conscious existence. Jesus thereby:

• Affirms resurrection from within the Pentateuch.

• Exposes their ignorance of “the Scriptures and the power of God” (22:29).

• Demonstrates that resurrection doctrine is consistent with Moses, not opposed to him.


Canonical Consistency

The Pentateuch silently implies resurrection (Genesis 5:24; 22:5; 49:10; Numbers 23:10). Prophets and writings develop it openly. Scripture is a unified whole; apparent tensions dissolve when each passage is read within the redemptive-historical arc culminating in Christ’s bodily resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3–8).


Archaeological and Manuscript Witness

1. Dead Sea Scroll 4QDeut n contains Deuteronomy 25 intact, showing the law’s antiquity.

2. First-century ossuaries bearing names like “Yehosef bar Qayafa” (Caiaphas) illustrate priestly families’ preoccupation with physical death, ironically underscoring their need for the very resurrection they denied.

3. Early papyri (𝔓¹⁰¹, ≈AD 200) preserve Matthew 22, evidencing textual stability.


Theological Implications

• Resurrection is not a late innovation; it is embedded in the covenant narrative.

• Misusing Scripture—restricting it to suit pre-chosen conclusions—breeds error.

• Jesus, the authoritative interpreter of Moses, confirms bodily life beyond the grave, later sealing the point by rising Himself (Matthew 28:5–7).


Practical Application

Believers can confidently uphold both Mosaic law and resurrection hope. Like Christ, answer honest questions from the Scriptures opponents accept, always pointing to the living Lord who proclaimed, “Because I live, you also will live” (John 14:19).


Summary

The Sadducees cited Moses because Deuteronomy 25 was the highest authority they recognized. They attempted to expose an alleged contradiction between that law and the doctrine of resurrection. Jesus refuted them from the very Torah they revered, proving that Moses and resurrection stand together, foreshadowing the empty tomb that secures eternal life for all who trust Him.

How does Matthew 22:24 challenge the concept of marriage in the afterlife?
Top of Page
Top of Page