Why does the vineyard owner decide to send his son in Luke 20:13? Text Of Luke 20:13 “Then the owner of the vineyard said, ‘What shall I do? I will send my beloved son. Perhaps they will respect him.’” Immediate Literary Context Jesus is responding to the religious leaders who challenge His authority (Luke 20:1-8). By framing their history in parabolic form, He exposes their long-standing rejection of God’s messengers (vv. 9-12) and anticipates their ultimate rejection of the Son (vv. 14-19). The question “What shall I do?” underscores the gravity and finality of the next step in God’s redemptive plan. Historical And Cultural Background Of Vineyard Parables A vineyard was a classic Old Testament symbol for Israel (Isaiah 5:1-7; Psalm 80:8-16). Landowners typically leased vineyards to tenant farmers who owed the owner a share of the harvest. The tenants’ refusal to pay and their violence toward the owner’s servants would have shocked Jesus’ hearers; Roman law permitted the owner to bring swift judgment. That the owner still chooses a conciliatory option illustrates extraordinary patience. The Identity Of The Vineyard Owner In the parable, the owner represents God the Father. His repeated appeals mirror centuries of prophetic overtures (2 Chronicles 36:15-16). Each rejected servant (Luke 20:10-12) embodies prophets such as Elijah, Jeremiah, and Zechariah, many of whom faced persecution (Hebrews 11:32-38). The Significance Of “My Beloved Son” “Beloved” (Greek: ἀγαπητός) echoes the Father’s declarations at Jesus’ baptism and transfiguration (Luke 3:22; 9:35). It signals unique filial status, contrasting prophets who were “servants” (δοῦλοι). The audience recognizes an heir whose presence carries the owner’s full authority (John 5:23). Exegetical Reasons For Sending The Son 1. Culmination of Revelatory Patience: The servants’ rejection did not exhaust the owner’s mercy; sending the son is the climax of relational overtures (Hebrews 1:1-2). 2. Offer of Final Respect Opportunity: “Perhaps they will respect him.” The Greek ἴσως indicates contingency, highlighting human responsibility (Romans 2:4). 3. Legal Assertion of Ownership: In Near-Eastern practice, appearance of the heir reaffirmed the owner’s legal claim, countering the tenants’ implicit attempt at adverse possession. Theological Motifs—God’S Longsuffering And Final Revelation God’s covenant love is displayed through escalating grace (Exodus 34:6-7). Yet grace has a limit; the rejection of the Son leads inevitably to judgment (Luke 20:16). Thus the sending both manifests mercy and sets the stage for righteous reckoning. Christological Fulfillment And Messianic Claims Jesus is self-identifying as the predicted Messianic Son (Psalm 2:7-12). Psalm 118:22-23—quoted moments later in Luke 20:17—predicts the stone rejected by builders becoming the cornerstone. The parable frames His impending crucifixion and vindicating resurrection (Acts 2:23-24). Prophetic Parallels In Scripture • Isaiah 5 presents an almost identical vineyard motif, forecasting exile for unfruitful Israel. • Jeremiah 7:25-26 laments continual rejection of messengers. • Zechariah 12:10 anticipates mourning “over Him whom they have pierced,” linking rejection to eventual repentance. Historical Validation Of Sonship And Resurrection Interlocking, early, and multiple attestation for the resurrection—Creedal formula of 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (dated A.D. 30-35), empty-tomb reports in all four Gospels, and post-resurrection appearances to friend and foe alike (e.g., James the Lord’s brother)—confirm the divine authentication of the Son. Archaeological finds such as the first-century Nazareth Inscription (prohibiting removal of bodies from tombs) align with a governmental concern arising from early resurrection preaching. Implications For Salvation History Sending the Son is God’s decisive act within a young-earth historical timeline that places creation, fall, covenants, incarnation, cross, and coming consummation in a coherent framework (Genesis 1-11; Romans 5:12-19). Just as geologic strata can be interpreted within catastrophic Flood models affirming Scripture’s chronology, redemptive events unfold within an ordered, purposeful history culminating in Christ. Application To Church And Individual The parable warns against institutional complacency. Stewardship belongs to those who honor the Son (John 15:5-6). On a personal level, one must decide whether to “respect” the Son; indifference equals rejection (Hebrews 2:3). Faith, repentance, and obedience bear the fruit the Owner seeks (Galatians 5:22-25). Conclusion The vineyard owner sends his son to extend final grace, assert rightful authority, and reveal the tenants’ hearts. The act typifies God’s climactic disclosure in Jesus Christ—mercy offered, authority declared, destiny determined. Respecting the Son brings life; rejecting Him invites judgment. |
    |