Why were the stones set up in Gilgal according to Joshua 4:20? Historical and Geographical Context The crossing occurred in early spring (Joshua 3:15) when the Jordan over-flows its banks, making the drying up of the river unmistakably supernatural. Gilgal lay just east of Jericho, the first campsite in Canaan (modern tell al-Mefjer vicinity). The Hebrew gilgal (“circle of stones,” from galal, “to roll”) already suggested a stone-ring landmark; Joshua’s action formalized it. Purpose as Covenant Memorial The stones functioned as covenant witnesses, paralleling the stone pillar Jacob raised at Bethel (Genesis 28:18) and Moses’ twelve-pillar altar at Sinai (Exodus 24:4). Each stone, taken “from the middle of the Jordan, from the place where the priests’ feet stood firm” (4:3), embodied the tribes’ collective participation in God’s redemptive act. Educational Function for Future Generations Twice the narrative highlights children’s questions (4:6; 4:21). Tangible objects lodge events in cultural memory—a principle confirmed by contemporary cognitive-behavioral studies showing increased retention when abstract claims are paired with concrete symbols. God designed the memorial to embed doctrine by triggering inter-generational storytelling. Theological Significance: Power and Presence of Yahweh The event answers the promise of Joshua 3:7—God exalting Joshua as He had Moses—and reiterates His mastery over chaotic waters (cf. Exodus 14; Psalm 114:3). The stones preach divine sovereignty, covenant faithfulness, and the exclusivity of Yahweh as living God amid Canaanite polytheism. Tribal Identity and Unity Twelve stones = twelve tribes, underscoring unity. The memorial discouraged later schism (contrast Judges 8; 1 Kings 12). Archaeologically, Early Iron I “foot-shaped” stone enclosures in the Jordan Valley (e.g., Bedhat esh-Sha‘ab, identified by Adam Zertal, 1980s) fit a tribal federation marking sacred encampments, lending plausibility to a stone-circle cultic site at Gilgal. Connection to Passover and Exodus Typology Israel kept Passover at Gilgal (Joshua 5:10-12). The memorial therefore bridges two water miracles—Red Sea and Jordan—and frames the conquest between Passover remembrances. The Hebrew wordplay “Gilgal… I have rolled away (galal) the reproach of Egypt” (5:9) links the stones to the spiritual emancipation inaugurated at the exodus. Archaeological Corroboration and Textual Reliability 1. LXX, MT, and the Dead Sea fragment 4QJosh—all preserve the twelve-stone notice verbatim, attesting textual stability. 2. Nearby Middle Bronze II city-wall collapse at Jericho (Kathleen Kenyon’s Phase IV destruction, radiocarbon ~1406 BC when the pottery is read without later-date assumptions) synchronizes with the conservative biblical chronology and places Gilgal’s stones within an archaeological horizon of rapid Israelite entry. 3. Egyptian topographical lists (Amenhotep III’s Soleb inscription, ca. 1400 BC) already mention “Yhw” in association with a nomadic people in the Sinai, supporting early Israel’s presence. Chronological Placement in a Young-Earth Framework Using Ussher’s chronology, Creation occurred 4004 BC; the Exodus ~1446 BC; the Jordan crossing 1406 BC. The stones thus stand roughly 2,600 years after Creation, well within a historical rather than mythical timeframe. Practical Applications for Today Believers erect “living stones” (1 Peter 2:5) by recounting Christ’s resurrection—the ultimate water-crossing from death to life. Regular testimony, corporate worship, baptism, and the Lord’s Supper serve the same memorial logic Joshua instituted at Gilgal. Summary The stones at Gilgal were raised as a perpetual, multi-layered witness: a historical marker of a real miracle; a covenant sign uniting all twelve tribes; an educational tool for future generations; a theological proclamation of Yahweh’s unrivaled power; and an apologetic anchor rebutting skeptical narratives. They stand as enduring evidence that the God who rolled back Jordan’s waters still “rolls away” reproach and brings His people safely into their inheritance. |
    |