Why were offerings given to priests?
Why were specific portions of offerings designated for priests in Leviticus 7:35?

Covenantal Setting

From Sinai forward, Israel lived under an explicit covenant in which Yahweh dwelled in their midst (Exodus 29:45–46). Priestly portions were embedded in that covenant to preserve the holiness of worship, provide perpetual witness to divine grace, and keep the priestly line functioning as mediators (Leviticus 6–10; Numbers 18:8–24).


Divinely Appointed Provision

1. No Land Inheritance: “You will have no inheritance in their land… I am your share” (Numbers 18:20). Priests were landless, so Yahweh Himself supplied their livelihood through portions of offerings (Deuteronomy 18:1–2).

2. Perpetual Statute: “All the consecrated gifts… I have given to you… as a perpetual statute” (Numbers 18:8). The allotment was permanent, transcending generational, economic, or political shifts.

3. Sanctified Food: Only holy specialists could safely consume that which had touched the altar (Leviticus 6:16–18). The designated pieces protected laity from inadvertent profanation.


Sacramental Participation

Sharing God’s table visibly demonstrated reconciliation. Priests ate what symbolically satisfied divine justice, portraying peace between God and man (Leviticus 7:11–15). In Near-Eastern treaty form, covenant meals ratified agreements; here the priests’ meal embodied Israel’s covenant.


Holiness Transfer and Contagion

Objects that touched the altar became “most holy” (Exodus 29:37). By eating these, priests internalized holiness, enabling them to re-mediate it to the people (Leviticus 10:10–11). Anthropological parallels show that cultures intuitively reserve sacred portions for cultic specialists; Israel’s law gives that impulse divine sanction.


Typological Foreshadowing of Christ

Hebrews points out that the Levitical system foreshadowed “a better hope” (Hebrews 7:19).

• Christ is both the perfected high priest and the once-for-all offering (Hebrews 7:27).

• Priestly portions preview believers’ present fellowship at the Lord’s Supper (1 Corinthians 10:16-18) and future Messianic banquet (Isaiah 25:6-9).

• The restriction of portions to priests anticipates the believer-priesthood in Christ (1 Peter 2:5-9), where access is granted by new birth rather than genealogy.


Economic Justice and Community Stability

Ancient agrarian societies lacked central banking; sustenance came directly from fields. By routing portions to those serving the tabernacle, the law institutionalized care for religious servants, widows, orphans, and resident aliens (Deuteronomy 14:27-29), modeling equitable economics rooted in divine generosity.


Priestly Inheritance as Theological Symbol

Possessing no farmland forced priests to depend daily on God’s faithfulness—an enacted parable of grace. Yahweh Himself is “their inheritance” (Ezekiel 44:28), prefiguring believers’ inheritance in Christ (Ephesians 1:11).


Consistency of Torah and Prophets

Samuel rebuked Eli’s sons for seizing more than allotted (1 Samuel 2:12-17), proving portions were limited, not exploitative. Post-exilic reforms under Hezekiah and Nehemiah revived priestly support (2 Chronicles 31:4-10; Nehemiah 13:10-13), showcasing continuity.


New Testament Affirmation

Paul appeals to the same principle: “Those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the altar. In the same way, the Lord has prescribed that those who preach the gospel should earn their living from the gospel” (1 Corinthians 9:13-14). The apostolic church viewed Levitical portions as an abiding ethical paradigm, now fulfilled through gospel support.


Practical Implications for the Contemporary Church

1. Financially support those laboring in Word and sacrament.

2. Recognize that stewardship is worship, not mere philanthropy.

3. Approach the Lord’s Table with awe, remembering the cost of holiness transferred to us through Christ’s body and blood.


Conclusion

Specific portions were designated for priests to:

• Sustain a landless mediatorial tribe,

• Exhibit God’s holiness and generosity,

• Foreshadow the sufficiency of Christ,

• Embed justice and gratitude in Israel’s economy, and

• Demonstrate the unified, inspired tapestry of Scripture that culminates in the gospel.

How does Leviticus 7:35 reflect the relationship between God and the priests?
Top of Page
Top of Page