Why did God spare the wheat and spelt in Exodus 9:32 during the plague? Text of the Passage “Now the flax and the barley were destroyed, because the barley was ripe and the flax was budding. But the wheat and spelt were not destroyed, because they ripen later.” (Exodus 9:31-32) Immediate Historical Context The seventh plague—hail mixed with fire—fell after six prior judgments that had already exposed the impotence of Egypt’s deities. Yahweh targeted specific economic pillars at the height of their vulnerability. Flax (for linen) and barley (for food and beer) stood in the fields at the close of winter; wheat and spelt, sown later, were still green and low to the ground. By sparing these later crops, God timed the judgment precisely, demonstrating omniscient control over nature rather than indiscriminate catastrophe. Agricultural Timing in Ancient Egypt • Winter (≈ mid-December – January): Barley heads and flax blossoms appear. • Early Spring (≈ February – March): Hailstorms are climatically possible in Lower Egypt when Mediterranean lows sweep south—confirmed by modern meteorological records. • Late Spring (≈ April – May): Wheat and spelt (“emmer,” Triticum dicoccum) mature. Herodotus (Histories 2.14) and the Wilbour Papyrus (13th-cent. BC land-tax records) list the same crop cycle, corroborating the biblical sequence. Divine Precision and Partial Mercy 1. Demonstration of measured judgment: God differentiates damage to prove the plague is not random (cf. Exodus 8:22). 2. Opportunity for repentance: Pharaoh receives continued sustenance and a temporal window to relent. Romans 2:4 notes that God’s kindness is meant to lead to repentance; sparing staple grain fits this pattern. 3. Preservation of Israel: Goshen’s safety (Exodus 9:26) and Egypt’s remaining food supply safeguard the Hebrews who still lived off the land (cf. Exodus 12:38). Polemic Against Egyptian Deities • Nut (sky) and Set (storms) are powerless to protect crops. • Osiris, associated with grain fertility, fails precisely where his devotees expect strength. The selective destruction intensifies the polemic: false gods can neither target nor spare. Typological Foreshadowing of Redemption Barley—firstfruits of spring—perishes; wheat—main Passover bread ingredient—survives. Christ, “the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20), would die and rise, securing a future harvest of believers. The spared wheat anticipates the preservation of the covenant line through which Messiah comes. Theological Summary God spared the wheat and spelt to: • prove His sovereignty by discriminating between crops, • extend mercy and an avenue for repentance, • expose Egypt’s gods, • foreshadow Christ’s redemptive firstfruits motif, and • preserve a food base for His covenant people. Practical Application Believers today can trust divine sovereignty amid selective trials, recognizing that every spared “wheat” is an invitation to repentance and gratitude. Unbelievers, like Pharaoh, stand warned that partial reprieves are not acquittals but calls to acknowledge the risen Lord “who gives life to everything” (1 Timothy 6:13). Key Cross-References • Measure in judgment: Isaiah 28:17 • Mercy in wrath: Habakkuk 3:2 • Firstfruits imagery: Leviticus 23:10-11; James 1:18 • Call to repentance: 2 Peter 3:9 Concluding Note The spared wheat and spelt exemplify deliberate, redemptive precision rather than agricultural happenstance, harmonizing agronomy, archaeology, theology, and the unified testimony of Scripture. |
    |