Do Christians and Mormons perceive Jesus identically? Definition of the Central Question The inquiry centers on whether both groups view and describe Jesus in a manner that is identical in nature, role, and essence. This entry will explore the foundational beliefs, scriptural sources, historical background, and doctrinal nuances that lead to significantly different portraits of Jesus. Historical and Scriptural Backdrop In early Christian history, councils such as Nicea (AD 325) and Chalcedon (AD 451) affirmed that Jesus is fully God and fully man, co-eternal and co-equal with the Father. These councils were grounded in scriptural teachings such as: • “‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.’” (John 1:1) • “‘Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.’” (Matthew 28:19) The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (often referred to as LDS or Mormon) was founded in the early 19th century. While they utilize the Bible, their doctrine also relies on the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price. These additional texts shape LDS teachings about Jesus in ways that differ from traditional historical creeds. Foundational Christian Perspective From a traditional standpoint, Jesus is the second Person of the Trinity. He has eternally existed without beginning or end. John 1:2–3 states, “He was with God in the beginning. Through Him all things were made, and without Him nothing was made that has been made.” This encompasses complete oneness with the Father and the Holy Spirit. Christ’s passion, death, and resurrection are the bedrock of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3–4). Salvation is available solely by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9). Christ’s redemptive work is understood as once-for-all (Hebrews 10:10), and believers are reconciled to God through this atoning sacrifice (2 Corinthians 5:21). Foundational Mormon Perspective Mormon texts affirm Jesus as Savior and Redeemer, but there are unique viewpoints: • God the Father is often described as an exalted being of flesh and bone. • Jesus is regarded as His literal “spirit Son,” distinct from the Father, and as the elder spirit brother of all humanity. • Teachings from Joseph Smith and subsequent church leaders describe the Godhead as three distinct personages in purpose rather than three co-equal Persons in one essence. Doctrine and Covenants 130:22 speaks of the Father and Son having “bodies of flesh and bones,” and Jesus is seen as a separate being from the Father, unified in will but not in essential being. This contrasts with the historical Christian creedal view of one fully shared divine essence. Comparison of Core Doctrines 1. Eternal Nature of Jesus • Traditional Christian View: Jesus is eternally God, without origin, equal to the Father in deity. • Mormon View: Jesus is the firstborn spirit child of Heavenly Father, chosen to be the Savior, yet not identical “Being” with the Father. 2. Role in Creation • Traditional Christian View: As stated in Colossians 1:16, “For in Him all things were created... all things have been created through Him and for Him.” Jesus’ creative work is that of the eternal God. • Mormon View: Jesus, under the Father’s direction, organized the world as Jehovah. While recognized as Creator, He remains a separate divine individual from the Father. 3. Godhead vs. Trinity • Traditional Christian View: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit share one divine nature. “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30) is taken to underscore unity of essence. • Mormon View: The Godhead is three distinct personages, each divine, united in purpose but not one in substance. Joseph Smith’s First Vision and subsequent teachings portray Father and Son as physically distinct beings. Names and Titles of Jesus The biblical record attributes many divine titles to Jesus, including “Immanuel” (God with us), “Alpha and Omega,” “Lord of Lords,” and “King of Kings.” LDS teachings share similar recognitions but interpret them through their doctrinal framework that includes Jesus’ pre-mortal existence as the literal Son of Elohim. Salvific Implications Within traditional Christian teaching, Jesus’ sacrifice is wholly sufficient to redeem humanity. This grace is received by faith: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your household” (Acts 16:31). In Mormonism, Jesus’ atonement is also central, but salvation is commonly described in two tiers: • General or universal resurrection for all. • Exaltation to the highest degree of heaven, which involves personal righteousness, temple ordinances, and covenants in addition to Christ’s atonement. Behavioral and Philosophical Perspectives When examining the differences from a behavioral scientist’s standpoint, the perception of Christ influences religious practices, motivations, and understanding of identity. In traditional circles, worship is directed to Jesus as God incarnate. In LDS gatherings, worship also acknowledges Jesus as divine but within a larger cosmological framework of spiritual progression. Philosophically, the question of Jesus’ identity touches ultimate meaning: is He the uncreated, eternal God, or an exalted being under the Father’s direction? The difference has profound existential and devotional implications regarding worship, prayer, and the nature of salvation. Archaeological, Early Writings, and Historical Support • Early Christian documents (e.g., writings of Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome) reflect an unwavering stance that Jesus is divine and of the same essence as the Father. • By contrast, Mormonism is tied to 19th-century developments. Documents such as the Book of Mormon (published 1830) and accounts from the Doctrine and Covenants shape Latter-day Saint doctrines of the Godhead. No archaeological or early manuscript evidence exists that aligns with a 19th-century revision of Jesus’ nature in the earliest centuries of Christian history. Rather, the consistent witness of early Christian writings upholds an unaltered divine identity of Christ. Conclusion of the Comparison While the names and scriptural references overlap, the theological framework differs. In historical, biblical Christianity, Jesus is viewed as the eternally begotten Son, consubstantial with the Father and the Holy Spirit. In Mormon teachings, Jesus’ divine identity is acknowledged but understood in a framework where He and the Father are separate, embodied beings, with Jesus being God’s spirit offspring who rose to deity. Given these distinctions, the two groups do not perceive Jesus identically in His eternal nature, relationship to the Father, and role in salvation. The shared use of biblical language and devotion to Jesus as Savior is present in both, but the underlying doctrines, historical developments, and additional scriptures in Mormonism create substantially different Christological portraits. |
    |