Does lying for God negate free will?
(Romans 3:7) If a lie can enhance God’s truth, why are we still held responsible for sin, and doesn’t this contradict free will?

I. Scriptural Context and Key Question

Romans 3:7 reads, “However, if my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases His glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?” This inquiry emerges in a broader discussion on human sin and divine righteousness (Romans 3:5–8). The question posed is whether one’s wrongdoing, such as lying, can paradoxically magnify God’s truth—and, if so, whether humans are truly culpable for sin.

II. Paul’s Argument in Romans 3

Paul’s teaching in Romans 1–3 progressively addresses the universal need for salvation. He begins (Romans 1:18–32) by detailing humanity’s fall into sin and idolatry. In Romans 2, he exposes that even those with moral or religious backgrounds (e.g., Jewish readers of the law) still stand guilty before God, for they fail to keep God’s commandments perfectly. By Romans 3, he anticipates an objection in which someone argues that human unrighteousness could serve to highlight the righteousness and truth of God.

Rather than invalidating human responsibility, Paul underscores that God remains completely just to judge sin, even when it is used to bring about a sharper contrast with His righteousness. The apostle dismantles any notion that sin is excusable simply because it might indirectly reflect God’s glory more brightly.

III. Defining Sin and Responsibility

1. Nature of Sin

From a biblical perspective, sin is any thought, word, or deed that violates the will and holiness of God (1 John 3:4). In other words, sin is more than social error; it is rebellion against the Creator’s moral law.

2. Source of Responsibility

The Scriptures identify humans as moral agents created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). Possessing the capacity for reason and choice, individuals bear genuine responsibility for their actions, whether righteous or sinful. This responsibility does not evaporate simply because God can sovereignly use even evil acts to accomplish His purposes (cf. Genesis 50:20).

3. Sin in the Light of God’s Holiness

God is entirely good, without any darkness (1 John 1:5). Sin cannot be excused or dismissed on the grounds that it might result in some benefit to God’s overall plan. God’s holiness insists on just judgment for every wrongdoing, regardless of how that wrongdoing might be used subsequently to showcase His truth.

IV. God’s Righteous Judgment

1. God’s Character as Just

Scripture repeatedly affirms that God exercises righteous judgment (Psalm 19:9; Romans 2:2). He is altogether holy, impartial, and infinitely wise. Because His nature is the standard of moral perfection, He will not condone evil, nor does He “overlook” sin.

2. The Good Purpose of Judgment

God’s judgment leads to vindicating His holiness and bringing human beings into accountability. Romans 3:8 addresses those who might slanderously claim, “Let us do evil that good may result.” Paul emphatically rejects this twisted reasoning. Judgment serves to correct, bring justice, and display His perfect righteousness.

3. No “Ends Justify the Means”

The idea that sin could be tolerated on the basis of enhancing God’s truth reflects a faulty notion that the results justify wrongdoing. But Scripture teaches that God’s moral law is absolute. Even if a lie seems to highlight God’s truth, the act of lying itself remains culpable before God.

V. Human Free Will and Sinful Choices

1. Nature of Free Will

Biblical teaching affirms that God created humanity with the ability to choose (Deuteronomy 30:19). This capacity involves moral and spiritual decisions, culminating in the responsibility to believe in God’s revealed truth and obey His commands.

2. Free Will Does Not Contradict God’s Sovereignty

Even though God sovereignly uses all events for His purposes (Ephesians 1:11), human decisions remain genuine exercises of will. Acts that transgress His command originate from human volition, not from divine coercion. Hence, God does not forcibly induce an individual to lie; the lie is the free act of that person’s will.

3. Accountability and the Consequences of Sin

Because God granted genuine freedom, each person is held responsible for their actions (2 Corinthians 5:10). Claiming that one’s lie ultimately showcased God’s truth fails to negate guilt. The action is still a violation of the moral law, with real ethical ramifications. Indeed, freedom entails accountability: without the capacity to sin, punishment and judgment would be meaningless. Yet with this capacity, there is just judgment on those who sin.

VI. Harmony with Broader Scriptural Witness

1. Old Testament Affirmation of Moral Responsibility

From the earliest texts, people are depicted as personally responsible for sin (e.g., Cain in Genesis 4). Archaeological discoveries, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, corroborate the ancient integrity of Old Testament passages that uphold God’s moral demands and universal justice—for instance, passages like Deuteronomy 24:16, which insists, “Each shall die for his own sin.”

2. New Testament Consistency in Teaching

The manuscript evidence for the Pauline epistles—among the best-attested works of antiquity—does not support any alteration in Paul’s teaching on human responsibility. Early manuscripts, such as the Chester Beatty Papyri (P^46) dating from around the late second to early third century, align with the point that God’s truth stands, yet sin remains condemnable.

3. Example of Judas Iscariot

Judas’s betrayal of Christ, though it ultimately led to the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus (foretold as God’s plan of salvation, Acts 2:23), does not exonerate Judas from moral guilt. Even though God used this treachery to fulfill prophecy, the betrayer’s sin still carried judgment upon his soul (Matthew 26:24–25).

VII. Clarifying the Purpose of the Law and the Cross

1. The Law as Revealer of Sin

Romans 3:20 states, “No one will be justified in His sight by works of the Law, for the Law merely brings awareness of sin.” By highlighting transgressions, the Law reminds us of our inability to earn righteousness through human effort. We see our guilt more clearly through the command, and thus “every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God” (Romans 3:19).

2. Christ’s Atonement for Sin

The free will question finds its resolution in the atoning work of Christ, who offers salvation to those who place faith in Him. Although sin remains worthy of condemnation, the grace of God in Christ provides a full pardon for those who confess their guilt and turn to Him in repentance. Romans 3:24–25 presents this remedy: “And are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. God presented Him as the atoning sacrifice, through faith in His blood…”.

3. Free Will Fulfilled in Christ

True freedom is thus found in Christ, liberating us from bondage to sin (John 8:36). This redemption does not negate accountability but instead transforms the believer’s will to desire righteousness. While human free will made sin possible, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit empowers a life that honors the truth of God.

VIII. Conclusion

Romans 3:7 and its surrounding context affirm that human sin does not escape judgment even if it somehow underscores God’s truth. This verdict rests on the principles that:

• God, being perfectly holy and just, must judge all wrongdoing.

• Humans, endowed with free will, bear moral responsibility for sin.

• Sin never becomes acceptable merely because it serves, in any incidental way, to highlight God’s righteousness.

• The consistent scriptural witness—preserved through a wealth of manuscript evidence—teaches that freedom and responsibility coexist under the sovereignty of a righteous God.

• Salvation from guilt does not come by evading responsibility, but through Christ’s redemptive sacrifice.

Thus, this passage in Romans does not contradict free will; instead, it underscores both the reality of our moral agency and the unwavering justice of God, who rightfully holds all sin to account while offering salvation and transformation through Jesus Christ.

If sin shows God's glory, why condemn us?
Top of Page
Top of Page