How do Christians view Muhammad versus biblical prophets? 1. Introduction to the Comparison Christians regard the biblical prophets as individuals called and inspired by God to speak His message, culminating in the coming of Jesus Christ. Discussions about Muhammad often arise in comparison to Old Testament prophets like Moses or Isaiah, and to the New Testament apostles who bore witness to Christ. In this entry, we will explore how Christians view Muhammad in contrast to the prophets of the Bible, drawing from Scriptural teachings and the historical bedrock of Christianity. 2. Foundational Criteria for Biblical Prophets A consistent element of Christian understanding lies in how biblical prophets are tested and affirmed: 1. Alignment with Previous Revelation Biblical prophets never contradict earlier truths of Scripture. Deuteronomy 13:1–4 and 18:20–22 provide the lens of discernment: if a prophet’s message is not consistent with what God had already revealed, or if their predictions fail, that figure is deemed false. 2. Anticipation of the Messiah The Hebrew Scriptures foretell a Messiah (e.g., Isaiah 9:6–7; Micah 5:2). These prophecies build toward the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which Christians identify as the fulfillment of those ancient promises (cf. Luke 24:25–27). 3. Focus on God’s Redemptive Plan Biblical prophets repeatedly highlighted God’s holiness, called people to repentance, and foreshadowed divine salvation. From Moses onward, the prophets directed hope to a future Redeemer who would bring eternal deliverance (Acts 3:22–24). 3. Core Christian Convictions About Jesus Because Jesus is seen as both the culmination and pinnacle of God’s revelation, all further claims to prophetic authority are measured against (1) Christ’s identity, (2) the Gospel message, and (3) the consistent teaching of the New Testament: 1. Jesus as the Final Revelation Hebrews 1:1–2 states, “On many past occasions and in many different ways, God spoke to our fathers through the prophets. But in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son...” This indicates the Christian conviction that full revelation came in the person of Jesus. 2. Centrality of the Resurrection The resurrection of Christ forms the heart of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3–8). In Christian belief, no message that denies or revises this central fact can stand in harmony with biblical truth (Galatians 1:8–9). 3. Christ as the Unique Savior John 14:6 maintains that Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life,” underscoring that He alone is the avenue to reconciliation with God. This exclusivity profoundly shapes how Christians evaluate claims of later prophets or alternate “paths” to God. 4. The Question of Muhammad’s Prophethood Islam reveres Muhammad as the final prophet, proclaiming that his teachings in the Qur’an supersede previous revelations. By contrast, Christians evaluate Muhammad’s claims in light of the foundational requirements for biblical prophets: 1. Divergence From the Gospel The Qur’an presents a different view of Jesus, denying His crucifixion and resurrection. Through the Christian lens, the crucifixion and resurrection are non-negotiable historical events supported by New Testament manuscripts, early Christian testimony, and the consistent witness of the church. These central claims about Jesus are in direct conflict with Islamic teaching. 2. Nature of God and Christ’s Deity Christianity maintains the triune nature of God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—while Islam rejects the Trinitarian view. Because biblical prophets and apostles repeatedly affirm God’s triune nature (Matthew 28:19; John 1:1, 14), any supposed new revelation contradicting this is not accepted within Christian theology. 3. Assertion of “Final Prophet” Status Christians see no warrant in Scripture for a figure who would supersede Christ. The apostles, such as Paul and Peter, taught that Jesus is the definitive revelation, not an intermediary prophet (Acts 4:12). Hence, a prophet declaring a new, ultimate message after Christ is outside the bounds of biblical teaching. 5. Historical and Theological Perspectives 1. Early Christian Evaluations From the earliest centuries, Christian communities measured any so-called prophecy against apostolic doctrine (Acts 17:11). As the content of the Qur’an came into broader exposure, theologians noted many irreconcilable contrasts with the biblical gospel. 2. Consistency of Biblical Manuscripts Scholars such as Dr. James White and Dr. Dan Wallace emphasize that extant manuscript evidence for the Bible exhibits remarkable consistency over centuries, reinforcing that the message of Christ crucified and risen is not a later invention. This continuity stands against claims that the scriptural portrayal of Jesus was misunderstood or altered. 3. Focus on Christ’s Supremacy The earliest confessions (Philippians 2:6–11) and creeds insisted on Christ’s full deity, atoning sacrifice, and bodily resurrection. In Christian thought, no subsequent prophet can bring a fundamentally different message without contradicting God’s established Word (2 Timothy 3:16–17). 6. Comparisons in Religious Practice and Belief 1. Canonical vs. Extra-Canonical Revelation Christians affirm the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments as the God-breathed and complete revelation for faith and practice. Whereas the Qur’an is outside the biblical canon, Christians maintain that God’s Word as recorded in Scripture remains unaltered and final. 2. Focus on Jesus’ Ministry Biblical prophets point consistently to the promised Messiah, directing worship toward the God revealed in the Scriptures. Prophets like Isaiah described the Messiah as “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” (Isaiah 9:6). This stands at odds with Muhammad’s message that denies Jesus as divine. 3. Salvation Through Christ Alone Christians profess that salvation is possible only through the atoning work of Jesus (Romans 10:9–10), rendering the path prescribed by Muhammad incongruent with the biblical path to eternal life. 7. Common Questions and Responses 1. What About Shared Moral Teachings? Christians acknowledge that certain moral injunctions (such as caring for the poor) may overlap across religious traditions. Yet the essence of biblical prophets transcends moral instruction, focusing on God’s redemptive intervention through Christ. 2. Why Not Accept Both Prophets? Because Christians hold that Jesus’ life, death, resurrection, and teachings are definitive and final, any opposing prophetic claim causes theological conflict. Biblical prophets and Jesus Himself pointed to no further revelation that would overturn or supersede what had already been delivered. 3. How Do Christians View Muhammad Personally? While not recognizing him as a prophet, Christians are called to treat all people with respect and charity (Romans 12:17–18). Critiquing Muhammad’s prophetic status does not diminish the Christian mandate to love one’s neighbor, including those of different beliefs. 8. Conclusion From a Christian standpoint, biblical prophets are uniquely verified by their alignment with God’s unchanging revelation and their consistent witness to Christ’s deity, atonement, and resurrection. As the central figure of salvation history and fulfillment of all prophecies, Jesus stands as God’s final Word, leaving no grounds for a later prophet to alter or supersede the gospel message. It is within this theological framework that Christians do not accept Muhammad as a prophet on par with those in Scripture. Instead, they uphold the Bible’s revelation and the supremacy of Christ, who is deemed the ultimate fulfillment of the prophetic word and the only means of reconciliation with God. |
    |