(Psalm 113:3) How do we reconcile the language of “from the rising of the sun” with modern astronomy’s heliocentric understanding of our solar system? Overview of the Passage Psalm 113:3 states: “From the rising of the sun to its setting, the name of the LORD is to be praised.” This expression has led some to wonder whether the Bible teaches an outdated, geocentric model of the cosmos. The following entry explores how to reconcile the language in this passage with a heliocentric understanding of our solar system, addressing interpretive methods, ancient cultural context, scriptural consistency, and the role of phenomenological language in communicating spiritual truths. “From the Rising of the Sun”: Common Observational Language In daily speech, it remains normal to say “sunrise” and “sunset” even in modern societies that accept the heliocentric model. Scripture’s phrase “from the rising of the sun” reflects the same kind of phenomenological (observational) language. The words describe what people regularly see: the sun appears on the horizon in the morning and disappears from view in the evening. This did not necessarily imply a fixed belief that the sun orbits the Earth any more than we believe that because we say “sunrise” today. It is rather a figure of speech describing the passage of time and the constancy of God’s praise throughout the entire day. Biblical Poetic Styles Psalm 113, like many of the Psalms, is poetical in form, using language designed to evoke praise and awe. Hebrew poetry frequently includes imagery and metaphors, describing the world from an observer’s standpoint. Examples of similar poetic expressions can be found in other Old Testament writings, such as describing the seas with “floodgates of the heavens” (Genesis 7:11) or referring to the “ends of the earth” (Job 28:24). In each case, rather than offering scientific treatises, the inspired authors employ everyday human language to emphasize spiritual and theological truths. By comparison, modern meteorologists continue to say “sunrise” and “sunset.” This usage does not refute scientific truths but communicates effectively from a viewer’s perspective. Thus, we see that biblical poetic styles incorporate this same observational approach, focusing on the relational and worshipful response of humankind toward God. Cultural Context and Ancient Near Eastern Language Ancient Near Eastern cultures, including Israel, often used movements of the sun, moon, and stars to structure calendars, agricultural cycles, and worship times. Consequently, referencing “from the rising of the sun to its setting” was a common way to designate the whole day. This cultural frame of reference guided linguistic expressions that have carried over into modern speech patterns. Furthermore, archaeological discoveries—such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (ca. 3rd century BC to 1st century AD)—show that scriptural texts, including the Psalms, retained consistent poetic forms over centuries. Despite the poetic style, these manuscripts do not support a rigid geocentric worldview that must remain literal; instead, they convey the same practical and figurative language still used in worship contexts. Scriptural Precedence for Figurative and Phenomenological Language 1. Joshua 10:12–13: In describing how the sun “stood still,” the language highlights a miraculous event demonstrated from the viewpoint of observers on Earth. 2. Ecclesiastes 1:5: “The sun rises and the sun sets.” Again, Solomon uses observational language to describe the routine cycle as perceived by human observers. 3. Job 38: God speaks poetically of creation, describing He “laid the foundations of the earth.” Although these statements are majestic and authoritative, they are not intended to be read as a complete scientific explanation of plate tectonics or orbital mechanics. Each example reinforces that Scripture often communicates through relatable language, reflecting human perception rather than offering exhaustive scientific descriptions. Historical Perspectives and Scientific Understanding Throughout history, many devout Christians have investigated the natural world scientifically, ultimately affirming a heliocentric solar system. For instance, Nicolaus Copernicus (16th century) and Johannes Kepler (17th century) both held to Christian convictions. Their works contributed to acceptance of the Earth’s orbit around the sun, illustrating that careful study of astronomy can coexist with reverence for Scripture. Additionally, geological and astronomical explorations, such as tracking solar movement across the sky, have confirmed that our vantage point from Earth shapes our language. These findings support the idea that the Bible’s references to the “rising of the sun” were never meant as contradictory assertions of an Earth-centered universe. Rather, they use the same everyday language that remains understandable to any culture or generation. Purpose and Theological Significance 1. Call to Constant Praise: Psalm 113:3 points to a continuous act of worship—God’s name is worthy of praise at all times. The emphasis is not on cosmic positions but on wholehearted devotion. 2. Universality of Worship: “From the rising of the sun to its setting” symbolizes the entire span of human experience each day, urging believers to praise God wherever they are, as time passes from dawn to dusk. 3. Harmony of Truth: The truth of God’s creation (Romans 1:20) complements the truth of Scripture. Properly interpreted, they affirm rather than contradict one another. In essence, the verse highlights the magnitude of God’s sovereignty. Earthly observers see the sun crossing the sky, and in response to that daily sign, they are reminded to praise Him throughout each moment of life. Reconciling Language and Belief When taken in context, Psalm 113:3 does not clash with modern astronomy. By understanding the poetic and observational nature of biblical language: • We uphold the integrity of Scripture. • We respect the reality of the created world that God designed. • We recognize that the Bible’s purpose is primarily theological and relational, while still containing truths consistent with God as Creator. Far from being contradictory, these truths unite to direct readers to worship the LORD who spun the cosmos into being (Genesis 1:1). Observational expressions and exalted praise harmonize without undermining the discoveries of astronomy. Conclusion Psalm 113:3 paints a vivid picture of unceasing praise using the universal, everyday experience of seeing the sun appear in the morning and fade from sight at night. This language, though non-scientific in form, aligns readily with a heliocentric perspective once we understand its poetic and phenomenological intent. God’s creation itself testifies to His glory, and Scripture’s use of human vantage points and figurative phrases does not diminish its reliability. Rather, it underscores the relevance and practicality of language intended to guide believers in continual worship. From daybreak to nightfall, or “from the rising of the sun to its setting,” the name of the LORD is proclaimed in awe by those who recognize Him as both Creator and King. |
    |