What does "strange flesh" mean in the Bible? I. Introduction to the Phrase “Strange Flesh” The term “strange flesh” arises most notably in Jude 1:7: “In like manner, Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, who indulged in sexual immorality and pursued strange flesh, are on display as an example of those who sustain the punishment of eternal fire.” The words “strange flesh” translate a Greek phrase often understood as “other flesh” (Greek: σαρκὸς ἑτέρας / sarkos heteras). The concepts behind this phrase form a crucial point of biblical interpretation regarding moral conduct, divine judgment, and the historical understanding of Sodom and Gomorrah. Below is an examination of this phrase and its context, drawing in relevant scriptural references, cultural background, and doctrinal insights. II. Biblical Context and Usage 1. Primary Reference in Jude: In Jude 1:6–7, the author warns believers by comparing certain immoral individuals to both fallen angels and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah. Verse 6 mentions angels who “abandoned their own domain”, and verse 7 compares the sins of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah to those angels’ rebellion. The phrase “pursued strange flesh” thus underscores a departure from or violation of God’s ordained order. 2. Connection to Genesis 19: The context of Sodom and Gomorrah’s sin is recorded in Genesis 19. These cities became notorious for their rampant ungodliness and particularly for sexual sins. Genesis 19:5 recounts how the men of the city sought to commit acts of immorality, even trying to assault angelic visitors who had come in human form. For this reason, later biblical authors, like Jude and Peter, hold Sodom and Gomorrah as exemplars of divine judgment against egregious sin. 3. Parallel in 2 Peter 2: A parallel text to Jude 1:7 appears in 2 Peter 2:6–10, which likewise declares that God condemned Sodom and Gomorrah as an example. Though Peter does not use the exact term “strange flesh,” he reinforces similar themes of immoral behavior and the subsequent judgment that befell the cities. III. Historical and Cultural Background 1. First-Century Understanding: In the broader Greco-Roman world, moral and sexual norms varied significantly. Yet Jude’s Jewish-Christian audience would be steeped in Old Testament teaching, recognizing Sodom and Gomorrah’s destruction as foundational to understanding divine wrath on sexual immorality (Genesis 18–19). 2. Meaning of “Strange Flesh” in Jude’s Day: The term “strange flesh” could imply sexual relations with angels (an echo of Genesis 6:1–4) or generally with those outside the natural boundary God designed (Romans 1:26–27). Many scholars connect this to both homosexual behavior and a desire for intercourse with angelic beings in Genesis 19. While exact nuances may vary, the phrase highlights behaviors contravening God’s established natural order. 3. Archaeological Support for Sodom and Gomorrah: Excavations at sites such as Tall el-Hammam and other locations near the Dead Sea have yielded evidence of ancient cities destroyed by sudden catastrophe consistent with biblical descriptions (Genesis 19). While scholarly debates continue regarding the precise identity of these sites, the archaeological record of a cataclysmic event aligns with the scriptural account, supporting the historicity of the events described around Sodom and Gomorrah. IV. Interpretations and Theological Perspectives 1. Violation of God’s Design for Marriage and Sexuality: Many see Jude 1:7 as denouncing any sexual union beyond what God has sanctioned. Leviticus 18:22–23 sets forth prohibitions that reflect God’s standard for sexuality. The reference to “strange flesh” underscores crossing moral boundaries given in Scripture. 2. Possibility of Angelic-Human Relations: Some interpret the comparison between the fallen angels of Jude 1:6 and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah as hinting that “strange flesh” involves a desire for angelic partners. This interpretation finds resonance in Genesis 6:2, where “the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful,” suggesting an illicit crossing of heavenly and earthly beings—though the details are debated. 3. Moral and Ethical Implications: Regardless of the precise interpretation, the message is consistent: misusing or perverting God’s design invites serious judgment. Scripture often ties sexual immorality to expressions of rebellion, warning that such sin both dishonors God and endangers communities. V. Scriptural Cross-References 1. Romans 1:26–27: This passage addresses turning away from God and being given over to “shameful lusts” and contrary desires, paralleling Jude’s warning about unnatural behavior. Paul lists various sins, including sexual immorality, cautioning that those who practice such behaviors without repentance will not inherit the kingdom of God. 3. 2 Peter 2:4–10: Peter demonstrates that just as angels who sinned faced God’s wrath, so did Sodom and Gomorrah. Both biblical authors highlight the severity of deviating from God’s way. VI. Doctrinal and Practical Implications 1. God’s Moral Standard: The phrase “strange flesh” urges readers to recognize that God has a clear and consistent standard for human sexuality. This standard is reflected from Genesis onward, affirming marriage as defined between a man and a woman (Genesis 2:24). 2. Seriousness of Unrepentant Sin: Jude 1:7 presents Sodom and Gomorrah as a warning against unrepentant sin. It underscores the biblical principle that willful disregard for God’s design invites His corrective judgment, both temporally and eternally. 3. Opportunity for Redemption: Scripture also emphasizes God’s desire for repentance and redemption (2 Peter 3:9). While the example of Sodom and Gomorrah highlights dire consequences, the Bible consistently points to grace through repentance and faith in Christ (John 3:16–17). VII. Modern Reflection and Application 1. Historical Reliability of the Account: Archaeological research around the Dead Sea lends weight to the historicity of the biblical record. These findings, when combined with manuscript evidence (such as the Dead Sea Scrolls demonstrating the reliability of the Old Testament text), bolster trust in the biblical account. 2. Relevance to Contemporary Ethical Questions: The consistent scriptural stance on sexual ethics and God’s design remains a touchstone for discerning right and wrong. While societal views may fluctuate, believers continue to look to passages such as Jude 1:7 to maintain a biblical moral framework. 3. Call to Purity and Love: Believers are encouraged to pursue holiness and show compassion. While condemning sin, Scripture also calls for love toward those struggling in various ways, offering the hope of transformation and new life through Christ. VIII. Conclusion “Strange flesh” as referenced in Jude 1:7 points to a significant biblical principle: there exists a God-ordained order for human relationships and a clear warning against crossing those boundaries. Within Genesis, Jude, 2 Peter, and Leviticus, Scripture unmistakably reiterates that sexual immorality—especially behavior contrary to God’s design—warrants divine judgment. Yet the overall message of Scripture remains one of both holiness and hope. The example of Sodom and Gomorrah stands as a stark warning, but the wider biblical narrative continually extends redemption through faith in Christ. Understanding “strange flesh” in its biblical context highlights God’s consistent standard of moral purity and underscores His desire to draw humanity into the joy of living within His gracious design. |
    |